Opinion

Akers v. Board of Parole

  • 126 Or. App. 265
  • 866 P.2d 527
  • 1994 Ore. App. LEXIS 112
Court
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Filed
Feb 2, 1994
Status
Published
On the bench
Durham, Edmonds, Tempore, Warren
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 17.1%

The opinion

PER CURIAM

Petitioner seeks review of an order of the Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision that imposed as a condition of parole that he not have contact with a particular person. He asserts that there is not substantial evidence to support imposition of the condition. We have reviewed the record, including evidence not disclosed to petitioner, and conclude that there is evidence justifying the imposition of the condition. He also challenges the refusal of the Board to disclose to him a letter it considered in imposing the condition. The withholding of the letter was not error. Flowers v. Board of Parole, 124 Or App 331 , 862 P2d 1312 (1993).

Affirmed.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.