Opinion

Nichols v. Oregon State Board of Pharmacy

  • 49 Or. App. 73
  • 618 P.2d 1003
  • 1980 Ore. App. LEXIS 4051
Court
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Filed
Nov 10, 1980
Status
Published
On the bench
Joseph, Warren
Cited by
1 cases
Authority
More cited than 67.1%

The opinion

PER CURIAM

In this judicial review proceeding the briefs demonstrated considerable confusion about just who did what and to whom. The record is not much help, and counsel for the agency, try as he might, was not successful in relieving the gloom. Petitioner requests that we appoint a master under ORS 183.482(7), but we are doubtful that that would help. Instead, we find that "the correctness of the action may have been impaired by a material error in procedure or a failure to follow prescribed procedure” and remand for further agency action. ORS 183.482(7).

Remanded.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.