Case law

Employment Division v. Archdiocese of Portland

42 Or. App. 421 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 1, 1979

Dickman et al v. … Division v. N. W. Christian College, 31 Or App 201 , 570 P2d 100 (1977), rev den (1978).

Fox v. Ross Bros.

175 Or. App. 265 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 5, 2001

SAIF appealed to the Board. … Accord SAIF v.

Bergun v. Employment Division

81 Or. App. 580 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 15, 1986

Babcock v. Employment Division, 72 Or App 486, 488 , 696 P2d 19 (1985). 2 Employer argues that the *584 vacation shutdown in June, 1983, is evidence of its “policy established by prior experience.” … The standard articulated in Babcock v. Employment Division, supra, and predecessor cases is known as the “any evidence” standard.

Maben v. Klamath County

57 Or. App. 730 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 9, 1982

PER CURIAM In its petition for rehearing petitioners correctly point out that the former opinion, Maben v. … She also stated in her affidavit that she participated in the dismissal of an employe and was told by the administrative assistant to the Board to use the rules set out in the handbook in discharging the employes.

State v. Marmon

143 Or. App. 315 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 28, 1996

State v. Allison, 143 Or App 241 , 923 P2d 1224 (1996); State v. Brown, 143 Or App 263 , 923 P2d 1236 (1996). Leeson, J., concurring.

Burns Bros. v. Employment Division

133 Or. App. 56 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 15, 1995

Co. v. Emp. Div. (Smith), 86 Or App 669 , 741 P2d 907 (1987), and Sun Veneer v. … We specifically noted in Sun Veneer v.

Miller v. City of Portland

255 Or. App. 771 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 27, 2013

Ayres v. Board of Parole, 194 Or App 429, 436 , 97 P3d 1 (2004) (quoting Marbet v. Portland Gen. Elect., 277 Or 447, 456 , 561 P2d 154 (1977)). … However, we touched on the concept in the context of Oregon administrative law in Taylor v. Board of Parole, 200 Or App 514 , 115 P3d 256 , rev den, 339 Or 475 (2005).

Pacific Northwest Bell Telephone Co. v. Katz

116 Or. App. 302 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 12, 1992

American Can v. Lobdell, 55 Or App 451 , 638 P2d 1152 , rev den 293 Or 190 (1982); Publisher’s Paper Co. v. Davis, 28 Or App 189 , 559 P2d 891 (1977); Pacific N.W. Bell v. … Board of Commissioners v. New York Telephone Co., 271 US 23, 31 , 46 S Ct 363, 366 , 70 L Ed 808 (1926).

Baker v. Lane County

28 Or. App. 53 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 17, 1977

We held that the State Board of Higher Education was immune from liability for plaintiff’s injuries, but that Lane County was not, and remanded the case for trial. Baker v. … Defendant rents stalls to persons who wish to board their horses at the fairgrounds.

Farmers Insurance Group v. State Accident Insurance Fund

76 Or. App. 494 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 20, 1985

Forest Fiber Products Co., 288 Or 337 , 605 P2d 1175 (1980); Robinson v. SAIF, 69 Or App 534 , 686 P2d 1053 (1984); Gronquist v. SAIF, 25 Or App 27 , 547 P2d 1374 (1976). … See Armstrong v. SAIF, 67 Or App 498 , 678 P2d 777 (1984) (Board’s order is not final until it is properly mailed). We agree with the Board that SAIF timely requested Board review of the referee’s decision.

State v. Howard

5 Or. App. 643 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 28, 1971

A portion of the roof which had previously been broken into and thereafter securely boarded up, had been rebroken and the boards torn off. A towel, flashlight and gloves were found on the roof. … State v. Hicks, 213 Or 619, 626-29 , 325 P2d 794 (1958); Hebb v.

Smith v. Brooks-Scanlon, Inc.

54 Or. App. 730 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 16, 1981

In Butcher v. … In Morris v.

State v. Sturgill

116 Or. App. 390 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 12, 1992

State v. Brown, 115 Or App 327 , 838 P2d 624 (1992); State v. Harding, 116 Or App 29 , 840 P2d 113 (1992).

Davis v. NYE DITCH USERS IMP. DIST.

247 Or. App. 266 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 14, 2011

See, e.g., City of Keizer v. … See also Miller v.

Shaw v. Portland Laundry/Dry Cleaning

61 Or. App. 368 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 19, 1983

Shaw v. Portland Laundry/Dry Cleaning, 47 Or App 1041 , 615 P2d 1134 (1980). … Holmes v. State Ind. Acc. Com., 227 Or 562, 574-75 , 362 P2d 371 , 363 P2d 563 (1961). Claimant has not referred us to any authority that would require a contrary conclusion here.

Sieczkowski v. Lane County

264 Or. App. 246 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 9, 2014

Brown v. SAIF, 262 Or App 640 , 325 P3d 834 (2014).

Matter of Domestic Partnership of Bartruff

199 Or. App. 86 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 13, 2005

Stufflebean v. Brown, 147 Or App 347, 349 , 935 P2d 482 (1997). Neither ORCP 68 nor ORCP 70 (2001) provides substantive statutory authority to award attorney fees.

Verment v. Nordstrom-Best

20 Or. App. 261 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 4, 1975

The hearing officer affirmed the denial as did the Workmen’s Compensation Board and the circuit court. Claimant appeals. While it is true that claimant’s treating doctor, Dr. Robert A. … While the 19-20 months’ lapse before mentioning his symptoms is not controlling, see Neathamer v. SAIF, 16 Or App 402 , 518 P2d 1051 (1974), it has some persuasion.

Stewart v. Employment Division

28 Or. App. 779 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 21, 1977

Claimant appeals from a decision of the Employment Appeals Board finding claimant disqualified from benefits under ORS 657.176(2) (a), which provides that an individual shall be disqualified if he has been discharged for … Claimant says that at most he was negligent and argues that Geraths v. Employment Division, 24 Or App 201, 205 , 544 P2d 1066 (1976), and Babcock v.

Lucas v. Clark

91 Or. App. 522 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 15, 1988

Because neither the Board order nor the referee’s opinion and order which it affirmed are adequate for judicial review, see Armstrong v. … Asten-Hill Co., 90 Or App 200 , 752 P2d 312 (1988), we remand to the Board for reconsideration. On remand, the Board also should reconsider this case in the light of Gwynn v.