The opinion
PER CURIAM
Claimant seeks review of a Workers’ Compensation Board order that affirmed the referee and upheld the denial of his aggravation claim for a back condition. We review for substantial evidence. ORS 656.298(6); ORS 183.482(7) and (8). Because neither the Board order nor the referee’s opinion and order which it affirmed are adequate for judicial review, see Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co., 90 Or App 200 , 752 P2d 312 (1988), we remand to the Board for reconsideration. On remand, the Board also should reconsider this case in the light of Gwynn v. SAIF, 304 Or 345 , 745 P2d 775 (1987), on remand 91 Or App 84 , 754 P2d 586 (1988), and International Paper Co. v. Turner, 304 Or 354 , 745 P2d 780 (1987), on remand 91 Or App 91 , 754 P2d 589 (1988).
Remanded for reconsideration.