Case law

Geer v. SAIF Corp.

121 Or. App. 647 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 14, 1993

SAIF petitioned the Board for review. … However, the order does not become final if, within that period, a party petitions the Board for review, ORS 656.289(3), or the referee abates the order. Lyday v. Liberty Northwest Ins.

St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. Speerstra

63 Or. App. 533 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 22, 1983

Brown v. Babcock, supra, 273 Or at 355-356 . 6 In US Nat’l Bank v. … The rule urged has never been applied in Oregon, although it was broached in Brown v. Babcock, 279 Or 351, 356 , 540 P2d 1402 (1975). It apparently came into being in two New York cases (Wilson v.

State v. McClure

256 Or. App. 200 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 17, 2013

State v. Brandon, 35 Or App 661, 663 , 582 P2d 52 , rev den, 284 Or 235 (1978). … Necanicum Investment Co. v. Employment Dept., 345 Or 138, 142-43 , 190 P3d 368 (2008).

Tidewater Barge Lines, Inc. v. Oregon Environmental Quality Commission

159 Or. App. 296 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 17, 1999

No. 48 v. Fair Dis. App. Bd., 14 Or App 35 , 512 P2d 799 (1973), the plaintiff challenged a decision of the Fair Dismissal Appeals Board by writ of review. … Wiggins v.

CAMPERS COVE RESORT, LLC v. Jackson County

240 Or. App. 782 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 16, 2011

See Flying J, Inc. v. … See Blacknall v.

State v. Roskelley

336 Or. App. 360 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 27, 2024

State v. Kirkland, 268 Or App 420, 425, 342 P3d 163 (2015) (quoting State v. Sigman, 141 Or App 479, 483, 919 P2d 45 (1996)). … The board shall resolve any conflict as to what may be a just and proper distribution.” 368 State v.

Oregon County Fair v. Filings of the National Council on Compensation Insurance

129 Or. App. 73 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 6, 1994

Castle Homes, Inc. v. Whaite, 95 Or App 269, 272 , 769 P2d 215 (1989). If that inquiry is inconclusive, worker status is determined by reference to the “relative nature of the work” test. See Woody v. … S-W Floor Cover Shop v. Natl. Council on Comp.

SAIF Corp. v. Ross

192 Or. App. 200 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 18, 2004

In SAIF v. … We upheld the board’s interpretation, finding it not implausible. Don’t Waste Oregon Com. v. Energy Facility Siting, 320 Or 132, 142 , 881 P2d 119 (1994). Petitioners now ask us to reconsider our opinion.

State v. Kast

120 Or. App. 74 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 12, 1993

ORS 475.035 grants authority to the Board of Pharmacy (Board) to modify the schedule. … State v. Sargent, 252 Or 579, 580 , 449 P2d 845 (1969). The statutory scheme must contain standards that circumscribe the agency’s exercise of the delegated powers. State v.

Dryden v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.

88 Or. App. 542 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 9, 1987

It is also subject to the Public Meetings Law, see Frohnmayer v. … See Urban Renewal Agency v. Lackey, 275 Or 35, 40 , 549 P2d 657 (1976); Georgeson v.

SAIF Corp. v. Ekdahl

170 Or. App. 193 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 4, 2000

Linnton Plywood v. Tax Com., 241 Or 1, 4 , 403 P2d 708 (1965) (citations and internal quotation marks omitted). … Div. v. Surata Soy Foods, Inc., 63 Or App 221 , 662 P2d 810 (1983), and Assoc. Reforestation Contractors, Inc. v. State Workers’ Comp. Board, 59 Or App 348 , 650 P2d 1068 , rev den 294 Or 295 (1982).

Fred Meyer, Inc. v. Benjamin Franklin Savings & Loan

73 Or. App. 795 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 22, 1985

SAIF Corp. v. Brewer, 62 Or App 124 (1983); Boise Cascade Corp. v. Starbuck, 61 Or App 631 (1983); Perdue v. SAIF, 53 Or App 117 (1981).” (Emphasis in original.) … Bracke v.

SAIF Corp. v. Ramirez

213 Or. App. 321 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 13, 2007

Claimant responds that, as the Supreme Court held in SAIF v. … Finally, we conclude that the board’s finding, based on Kane’s report, that claimant suffers from chronic condition impairment is supported by substantial evidence. See Weckesser v.

Champion v. Employment Dept.

Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 29, 2023

Affirmed. 72 Champion v. Employment Dept. HELLMAN, J. … Put another way, the board must provide an explanation for how it reached its conclusion. Castro v. Board of Parole, 232 Or App 75, 83, 220 P3d 772 (2009).

Benson v. Multnomah County School District 1

101 Or. App. 122 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 4, 1990

The Board therefore concluded that she had established a compensable injury with physical and psychological components. 2 The Board then reviewed her alleged chemical sensitivity and psychological stress conditions as they … ORS 656.802(1); SAIF v. McCabe, 74 Or App 195, 199 , 702 P2d 436 (1985); SAIF v. Gygi, 55 Or App 570, 574 , 639 P2d 655 , rev den 292 Or 825 (1982).

JELD-WEN, INC. v. PacifiCORP

240 Or. App. 124 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 29, 2010

suffered or to the findings of said board, and further agree to conform promptly to the findings of said board and to abide thereby * * *." … The Supreme Court's reasoning in Snider v. Production Chemical Manufacturing, Inc., 348 Or. 257 , 230 P.3d 1 (2010), and this court's reasoning in Martin v.

State v. Wise-Welsh

318 Or. App. 146 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 2, 2022

Compare Stock, 209 Or App at 13, with State v. … Id.; see also State v.

Pincetich v. Nolan

252 Or. App. 42 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 29, 2012

That exception provides: “(2) The board, arbitrator or court may not apply the provisions of [ORS 701.131(1)] to a contractor if the board, arbitrator or court determines that: «S|í * * * * “(c) The proceeding: “(A) Is directed … Parsons v. Henry, 65 Or App 627, 629 , 672 P2d 717 (1983), rev den, 297 Or 82 (1984). ORS 701.131(1) is one of the provisions in chapter 701 that the legislature adopted to do that.

Brumage v. ESCO CORP.

248 Or. App. 399 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 29, 2012

Employer denied the claim, and an administrative law judge and the board rejected claimant’s attempt to establish an occupational disease for that discrete period of time. Citing our opinions in Wantowski v. … Crown Cork & Seal, 164 Or App 214 , 991 P2d 574 (1999), and Lecangdam v.

Wood v. State Accident Insurance Fund

30 Or. App. 1103 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 26, 1977

The Board reversed holding the injury was not compensable. … See also, Keefer v. State Ind. Acc. Commission, 171 Or 405 , 135 P2d 806 (1943); Johnson Lbr. Co. v. SAIF, 20 Or App 419 , 532 P2d 38 (1975).