Case law

Schade v. State Board

94 Or. App. 522 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 21, 1988

On the basis of that report, the Board ordered no change in petitioner’s release date. Petitioner seeks review of the Board’s order. We affirm. … Accordingly, the Board did not err in issuing its order. Affirmed.

Nakashima v. Board of Education

204 Or. App. 535 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 15, 2006

In Montgomery v. … Neither OSAA nor the board has opposed the motion. . We have allowed the motion to intervene. In Barendrecht v.

Davis v. Board of Parole

200 Or. App. 366 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 22, 2005

Board of Pardons v. … Hamel v.

Lewis-Taylor v. Board of Parole

329 Or. App. 53 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 8, 2023

Like the petitioners in two other cases decided today, Sohappy v. Board of Parole, 329 Or App 28, ___ P3d ___ (2023), and Watson v. … The petitioner in Watson did not raise the issue to the board, but, relying on Tuckenberry v.

Hettle v. Construction Contractors Board

260 Or. App. 135 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 18, 2013

See Shin v. … See Conway v.

Johnson v. Civil Service Board

162 Or. App. 527 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 15, 1999

Our disposition “Reversed and remanded,” Johnson v. … Civil Service Board, 161 Or App 489, 506 , 985 P2d 854 (1999), is clarified and modified to read: “Reversed and remanded with instructions to issue writ reversing decision of Civil Service Board and determining petitioner

Meriweather v. Board of Parole

92 Or. App. 705 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 24, 1988

ORS 144.335 grants this court jurisdiction only over orders of the Board that fix a parole release date, revoke parole, or discharge a person from parole. Addicks v. … Board of Parole, 63 Or App 409, 413 , 663 P2d 1310 (1983). Because the order in this case does none of those things, we lack jurisdiction. 2 Petition for judicial review dismissed.

Murphy v. Board of Parole

241 Or. App. 177 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 23, 2011

v. … failed to challenge an alternate ground for the board's decision); Maimon v.

Willaby v. Board of Parole

103 Or. App. 83 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 8, 1990

In Harris v. … .’ ” Meriweather v.

Teague v. Board of Parole

105 Or. App. 1 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 26, 1990

In Meriweather v. … The Board’s interpretation and application of ORS 144.228 are correct. Affirmed.

Boyd v. Board of Parole

23 Or. App. 266 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 3, 1975

On June 18, 1975 the State Board of Parole afforded him a hearing, after which it rescinded the parole action it had formerly taken, because of petitioner’s demonstrated inability to properly handle his situation, and recommended … See Morrissey v. Brewer, supra, 408 US at 489 ; ORS 144.343(3) (a). We hold the Morrissey and statutory requirements did not apply to petitioner because he was not in parole status. In Bailleaux v.

Walker v. Board of Parole

341 Or. App. 64 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 4, 2025

Board of Parole judicial imposition of fees and costs in amounts so oner- ous as to unreasonably limit access to the courts.” Allen v. Employment Dept., 184 Or App 681, 688, 57 P3d 903 (2002). … See Bradley v.

Murphy v. Oregon Medical Board

344 Or. App. 319 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 22, 2025

In March 2021, following briefing, we affirmed the board’s order without opinion. Murphy v. Oregon Medical Board, 309 Or App 596, 481 P3d 313, rev den, 368 Or 637 (2021). … Murphy v. Oregon Medical Board, 368 Or 637, 496 P3d 630 (2021). That brings us directly to the new case before us.

Brown v. Bunch Tire Bailer, Inc.

73 Or. App. 250 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 17, 1985

See Fulgham v. SAIF, 63 Or App 731, 734-35 , 666 P2d 850 (1983). We hold that the dismissal of the case in issue was error on this record. … The Board, in promulgating OAR 436-83-310, limited its discretion and must act in accordance therewith. See Wyers v. Dressier, 42 Or App 799, 807-08 , 601 P2d 1268 (1979).

Nakashima v. Board of Education

206 Or. App. 568 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 28, 2006

To begin with, we addressed — and rejected — it in Montgomery v. Board of Education, 188 Or App 63, 71-77 , 71 P3d 94 (2003). … See, e.g., Kinross Copper Corp. v.

Stacey v. Board of Accountancy

26 Or. App. 541 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 23, 1976

Co. v. Hill, 235 Or 352, 356-57 , 384 P2d 219 (1963). … In Gantenbein v.

Meriweather v. Board of Parole

97 Or. App. 212 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 14, 1989

Consequently, the state argues, the Board acted properly under the statute. It is unclear from the present record which rule the Board applied. … Meriweather v. Board of Parole, 92 Or App 705 , 759 P2d 1141 (1988).

Hein v. Board of Parole

56 Or. App. 293 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 8, 1982

It is uncontested that petitioner is a person over whom the Board exercises control and that the Board’s order setting the parole release date is a “final order” within the meaning of ORS 144.335(1). Harris v. … The Board contends that such a holding would “nullify” our decision in Cruz v.

Waltz v. Board of Parole

18 Or. App. 652 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 23, 1974

with Morrissey v. … Brewer, supra, by the granting of a dispositional hearing by the Board or its designated representative in Oregon or in Alaska. The Parole Board acknowledged its lack of compliance with Morrissey v.

Yankee v. Oregon Medical Board

280 Or. App. 1 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 3, 2016

Petitioner seeks judicial review of a default final order of the Oregon Medical Board (the board) that revoked petitioner’s license to practice medicine and assessed a civil penalty. … The board responds that “the rule required the board determine, as a factual matter, whether there was any dispute over petitioner’s reasons for not appearing at the hearing,” and that the board correctly stated and applied