Opinion

Meriweather v. Board of Parole

92 Or. App. 705
759 P.2d 1141
1988 Ore. App. LEXIS 1481

Court: Court of Appeals of Oregon
Filed: Aug 24, 1988
Status: Published
On the bench: Graber, Hoomissen
Cited by: 2 cases
Authority: More cited than 81.8%

The opinion

PER CURIAM

Petitioner seeks judicial review of an order of the Board of Parole setting a “parole consideration date.” See ORS 144.228. He asserts that we have jurisdiction pursuant to ORS 144.335. 1 We do not.

ORS 144.335 grants this court jurisdiction only over orders of the Board that fix a parole release date, revoke parole, or discharge a person from parole. Addicks v. Board of Parole, 63 Or App 409, 413 , 663 P2d 1310 (1983). Because the order in this case does none of those things, we lack jurisdiction. 2

Petition for judicial review dismissed.

Petitioner also cites OAR 255-80-010 and ORS 183.482 as bases for jurisdiction. The administrative rule is inapposite, and ORS 183.482 does not apply to persons in custody of the Department of Corrections. ORS 183.315(5).

At oral argument, we asked the Public Defender and the Attorney General to provide additional briefing on the merits. Both submitted excellent briefs, which we appreciate.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.