applying Reguero factors; concluding that police officer’s hearsay testimony recounting accusations of public indecency did not constitute substantial evidence that the petitioner had, in fact, engaged in such conduct
How later courts described this case
- applying Reguero factors; concluding that police officer’s hearsay testimony recounting accusations of public indecency did not constitute substantial evidence that the petitioner had, in fact, engaged in such conduct
- reviewing circuit court judgment in writ of review action, which affirmed decision of city civil service board sustaining city employee’s demotion
Written by the judges who cited it.
The opinion
HASELTON, J.
Appellant has moved to “clarify” our disposition because “[i]t seems the parties are unable to agree on what the Court of Appeals intended to happen next.” We allow the motion. Our disposition “Reversed and remanded,” Johnson v. Civil Service Board, 161 Or App 489, 506 , 985 P2d 854 (1999), is clarified and modified to read: “Reversed and remanded with instructions to issue writ reversing decision of Civil Service Board and determining petitioner’s entitlement to ancillary relief, including reinstatement and restitution, pursuant to ORS 34.100.”
Motion granted; disposition modified to read: “Reversed and remanded with instructions to issue writ reversing decision of Civil Service Board and determining petitioner’s entitlement to ancillary relief, including reinstatement and restitution, pursuant to ORS 34.100.”; otherwise adhered to.