Case law

State v. Alexander

44 Or. App. 557 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 19, 1980

That test is set out in State v. Brown, supra, and is used customarily to determine when multiple charges must be joined in a single trial. ORS 131.515(2), supra, note 6; see also State v. … State v. Brown, supra, 262 Or at 446, n 10 . "15.

Davis v. O'Brien

128 Or. App. 428 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 8, 1994

Plaintiff argued that Mills v. Brown, 303 Or 223 , 735 P2d 603 (1987), precluded the jury’s consideration of such evidence and arguments. … Plaintiff objected to this proposed form of judgment, arguing that Mills v. Brown, supra, precluded a reduction of defendants’ liability based on the proportionate fault of a settling joint tortfeasor.

SAIF Corp. v. Owens

247 Or. App. 402 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 29, 2011

In Hicks v. … Libbett v.

Simi v. LTI Inc. - Lynden Inc.

300 Or. App. 258 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 30, 2019

Hunter v. … See Smirnoff v.

Evans v. Schrunk

4 Or. App. 437 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 28, 1971

The circuit court correctly tried the Writ on the record made by and brought from the Board. See Wing v. City of Eugene, 249 Or 367, 371 , 437 P2d 836 (1968). … Schrunk, 242 Or 196 , 409 P2d 177 (1965); Hicks v. Schrunk, 238 Or 181 , 393 P2d 771 (1964); Miller v. Schrunk et al, 232 Or 383 , 375 P2d 823 (1962); City of Portland v.

Lowells v. SAIF Corp.

285 Or. App. 161 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 3, 2017

Bowen v. Fred Meyer Stores, 202 Or App 558, 563-64, 123 P3d 367 (2005), rev den, 341 Or 140 (2006). In Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp. v. … We recently said in Corkum v.

Barackman v. General Telephone Co. of Northwest, Inc.

25 Or. App. 293 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 26, 1976

Finally, as we held in Calder v. … As we noted in Cutright v. Amer.

SAIF Corp. v. Swartz

247 Or. App. 515 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 29, 2011

After remand, the board allowed the claim for gastric bypass surgery, and SAIF and the employer sought review. We affirmed the board, SAIF v. … .”); Counts v.

In Re Brown

198 Or. App. 533 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 16, 2005

App. 533 IN RE BROWN STATE v. BROWN Court of Appeals of Oregon March 16, 2005 Affirmed without opinion.

Broeke v. SAIF

300 Or. App. 91 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 16, 2019

In Spurger v. … See SAIF Corp. v.

State v. Starr

91 Or. App. 267 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 18, 1988

State v. Messer, 71 Or App 506 , 692 P2d 713 (1984). The state relies on State v. … State v. Brown, supra, 47 Or App at 204 . However, Brown is distinguishable, because the defendant there did not argue that his identity should be suppressed. Affirmed.

VAN RIJN v. Employment Dept.

237 Or. App. 39 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 25, 2010

VAN RIJN, Petitioner, v. EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT and AGVENTURES NW, LLC, Respondents. 09AB1900; A142989. Court of Appeals of Oregon. Submitted on June 04, 2010. Decided August 25, 2010. … He disputes the board's finding that continuing work was available. We review the board's findings of fact for substantial evidence. ORS 657.282; ORS 183.482(8)(c).

Beveridge v. Johnson

157 Or. App. 57 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 4, 1998

OAR 255-80-012(3)(c). 4 Applying the reasoning of the dissenting opinion in Murphy v. … Greenholtz v. Nebraska Penal Inmates, 442 US 1 , 99 S Ct 2100 , 60 L Ed 2d 668 (1979). However, once paroled, a parolee has a liberty interest the termination of which is subject to an orderly process. Morrissey v.

Cascade Bargaining Council v. Jefferson County School District No. 509-J

83 Or. App. 418 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 28, 1987

Petitioner seeks judicial review of a decision of the Employment Relations Board (ERB) that found that petitioner had committed an unfair labor practice by failing to sign a collective bargaining agreement incorporating the … Whatever else that provision may mean, see, e.g., Brown v.

Henn v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.

60 Or. App. 587 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 8, 1982

Claimant appeals from an order of the Workers' Compensation Board that held that her work as a magazine salesperson was as an independent contractor, not an employe. … Woody v. Waiber, supra, 276 Or. at 197 , 554 P.2d 492 . Application of the control test convinces us that the Board's decision was correct. Affirmed. THORNTON, Judge, dissenting.

Khimich v. Employment Dept.

329 Or. App. 715 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 20, 2023

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON NATALYA V. KHIMICH, Petitioner, v. … Also on the brief were Whitney Brown and Stoel Rives LLP. Before Tookey, Presiding Judge, and Egan, Judge, and Kamins, Judge. PER CURIAM Reversed and remanded. Lavelle-Hayden v.

Langford v. Langford

262 Or. App. 409 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 23, 2014

Brown v. Roach, 249 Or App 579, 580 , 277 P3d 628 (2012) (citations and internal quotation marks omitted). We state the facts consistently with that standard. … Brown, 249 Or App at 583 ; see ORS 30.866(1) - (2). Finally, the petitioner must show that “the contacts, cumulatively, caused her reasonably to fear for her personal safety.” Bryant v.

State v. Showalter

134 Or. App. 34 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 26, 1995

State v. Cort-man, 251 Or 566, 569 , 466 P2d 681 (1968), cert den 394 US 951 (1969). … See State v. Lee, 120 Or 643 , 253 P 533 (1927); State v. Russo, 68 Or App 760, 763 , 683 P2d 163 (1984).

Employment Division v. Scott MacHinery Co.

48 Or. App. 61 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 2, 1980

"McPherson v. … Oliver v. Employment Division, 40 Or App 487 , 595 P2d 1252 (1979).

Delgado v. Souders

146 Or. App. 580 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 5, 1997

First, he asserts that, although denominated a “civil” proceeding, an action under ORS 30.866 is “criminal in nature” under the rationale of Brown v. Multnomah County Dist. Ct., 280 Or 95 , 570 P2d 52 (1977). … But see Megdal v. Board of Dental Examiners, 288 Or 293 , 605 P2d 273 (1980).