Opinion

Khimich v. Employment Dept.

  • 329 Or. App. 715
Court
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Filed
Dec 20, 2023
Status
Unpublished
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 30.8%

The opinion

No. 678 December 20, 2023 715

This is a nonprecedential memorandum opinion

pursuant to ORAP 10.30 and may not be cited

except as provided in ORAP 10.30(1).

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE

STATE OF OREGON

NATALYA V. KHIMICH,

Petitioner,

v.

EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT

and Oregon Health Sciences University,

Respondents.

Employment Appeals Board

2022EAB0402; A178961

Argued and submitted November 6, 2023.

Ray D. Hacke argued the cause for petitioner. Also on the

briefs was Pacific Justice Institute.

Emily N. Snook, Assistant Attorney General, argued

the cause for respondent Employment Department. Also on

the brief were Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, and

Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General.

Misha Isaak argued the cause for respondent Oregon

Health & Science University. Also on the brief were Whitney

Brown and Stoel Rives LLP.

Before Tookey, Presiding Judge, and Egan, Judge, and

Kamins, Judge.

PER CURIAM

Reversed and remanded. Lavelle-Hayden v. Employment

Dept., 326 Or App 490, 533 P3d 75 (2023).

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.