Case law

SAIF v. Krusenstjerna

346 Or. App. 429 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 7, 2026

Providence Health System v. … On this record then, the board opinion lacks sub- stantial evidence and substantial reason. Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp. v.

Davis v. O'Brien

128 Or. App. 428 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 8, 1994

Plaintiff argued that Mills v. Brown, 303 Or 223 , 735 P2d 603 (1987), precluded the jury’s consideration of such evidence and arguments. … Plaintiff objected to this proposed form of judgment, arguing that Mills v. Brown, supra, precluded a reduction of defendants’ liability based on the proportionate fault of a settling joint tortfeasor.

Andrews v. Sandpiper Villagers, Inc.

215 Or. App. 656 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 31, 2007

Id,.; see also Bachmeier v. … Staffordshire Investments, Inc. v. Cal-Western, 209 Or App 528, 535-36 , 149 P3d 150 (2006) (citing Kabil Developments Corp. v. Mignot, 279 Or 151, 157-58 , 566 P2d 505 (1977)).

SAIF Corp. v. Swartz

247 Or. App. 515 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 29, 2011

After remand, the board allowed the claim for gastric bypass surgery, and SAIF and the employer sought review. We affirmed the board, SAIF v. … .”); Counts v.

Alderson v. State of Oregon

105 Or. App. 574 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 13, 1991

In Adams v. … See Martin v. Glenbrook Farms Corp., 110 Or 87, 89 , 222 P 1102 (1924), overruled on unrelated grounds, Broyles v. Brown, 295 Or 795 , 671 P2d 94 (1983); Bartel v. Mathias, 19 Or 482, 488-89 , 24 P 918 (1890).

State Ex Rel. Engweiler v. Powers

232 Or. App. 214 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 25, 2009

Engweiler v. … Miller v.

Cascadia Wildlands v. Or. Dep't of State Lands

293 Or. App. 127 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 1, 2018

Dist. et al. v. … See also, e.g ., State Land Board v.

Fister v. South Hills Health Care

149 Or. App. 214 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 16, 1997

Planned Parenthood Assn. v. Dept. of Human Res., 297 Or 562 , 687 P2d 785 (1984). In State v. … See also Meltebeke v. Bureau of Labor and Industries, 322 Or 132 , 903 P2d 351 (1995). In Lloyd Corporation v.

Coleman v. SAIF

304 Or. App. 122 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 13, 2020

Standard of Review We review the board’s order pursuant to ORS 656.298(7)1 and ORS 183.482(8).2 Atkins v. … Thus, we review the board’s order for legal error and state the facts in accordance with the board’s factual findings, which are convoluted but not disputed. See King v.

State v. Graves

92 Or. App. 642 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 24, 1988

Robert Brown was arrested in December, 1986, when he attempted to cash a stolen check. … Brown went to a car used by defendant and Preston, and Zahler saw Preston give Brown an envelope which contained nine checks made out to Sherry Johnson.

VAN RIJN v. Employment Dept.

237 Or. App. 39 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 25, 2010

VAN RIJN, Petitioner, v. EMPLOYMENT DEPARTMENT and AGVENTURES NW, LLC, Respondents. 09AB1900; A142989. Court of Appeals of Oregon. Submitted on June 04, 2010. Decided August 25, 2010. … He disputes the board's finding that continuing work was available. We review the board's findings of fact for substantial evidence. ORS 657.282; ORS 183.482(8)(c).

Employment Division v. Scott MacHinery Co.

48 Or. App. 61 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 2, 1980

"McPherson v. … Oliver v. Employment Division, 40 Or App 487 , 595 P2d 1252 (1979).

State v. Farley

78 Or. App. 102 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 26, 1986

State v. … Subsequently the holding of Brown was enacted as legislation and codified as ORS 131.515(2). Or Laws 1973, ch 836, §27. In State v.

State v. Thompson

57 Or. App. 281 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 12, 1982

In Brown v. Multnomah County Dist. … Iannelli v. United States, 420 U.S. 770 , 785 n. 17 [ 95 S.Ct. 1284 , 43 L.Ed.2d 616 ] (1975)." Brown v. Ohio, 432 U.S. 161, 166 , 97 S.Ct. 2221 , 53 L.Ed.2d 187 (1977).

Walker v. State

256 Or. App. 697 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 22, 2013

Brown, 310 Or 347, 355-56 , 800 P2d 259 (1990), and Ailes . The parties’ mutual, threshold assumption in that regard is incorrect. … Until the post-conviction court issued its judgment, petitioner had no reason to know that it would not include findings comporting with ORS 138.640(1). 1 Thus, the issue on appeal, uncomplicated by reference to Brown or

In Re Brown

198 Or. App. 533 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 16, 2005

App. 533 IN RE BROWN STATE v. BROWN Court of Appeals of Oregon March 16, 2005 Affirmed without opinion.

SAIF Corp. v. Owens

247 Or. App. 402 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 29, 2011

In Hicks v. … Libbett v.

Evans v. Schrunk

4 Or. App. 437 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 28, 1971

The circuit court correctly tried the Writ on the record made by and brought from the Board. See Wing v. City of Eugene, 249 Or 367, 371 , 437 P2d 836 (1968). … Schrunk, 242 Or 196 , 409 P2d 177 (1965); Hicks v. Schrunk, 238 Or 181 , 393 P2d 771 (1964); Miller v. Schrunk et al, 232 Or 383 , 375 P2d 823 (1962); City of Portland v.

Godinez v. SAIF Corp.

269 Or. App. 578 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 11, 2015

See Gienger v. … Gafur v. Legacy Good Samaritan Hospital, 344 Or 525, 533 , 185 P3d 446 (2008).

State v. Hauskins

251 Or. App. 34 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 5, 2012

See Rondeau v. Board of Parole, 232 Or App 488, 491 , 222 P3d 753 (2009); see also State v. Gibbens, 25 Or App 185, 187-88 , 548 P2d 523 (1976). … ORS 33.105(2); see also Brown v. Multnomah County Dist. Ct., 280 Or 95, 103 , 570 P2d 52 (1977) (punitive confinement for an act indicates the act is a crime).