Case law

State v. Rook

14 Or. App. 211 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 16, 1973

Although our Supreme Court in State v. Fair, 263 Or 383 , 502 P2d 1150 (1972), held that State v. Brown, supra, was not to be applied retroactively, defendant contends that Fair was in effect overruled by Robinson v. … In State v.

State v. James

159 Or. App. 502 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 14, 1999

See State v. Brown, 262 Or 442, 459 , 497 P2d 1191 (1972) (reserving that question). … The parties would have us look to Brown v.

State v. LLOYD A. FRY ROOFING COMPANY

9 Or. App. 189 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 13, 1972

Section 2-1.1 (v). … State v. Brown, 73 Or 325 , 144 P 444 (1914).” The above statute requires no greater intent than the words of the offense carry. This is what the indictment alleged and that is all that is required. See, State v.

Russell v. Deere & Co.

186 Or. App. 78 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 29, 2003

Brown v. … See Brown at 480 .

State v. Stafford

157 Or. App. 445 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 9, 1998

In State v. … In State v.

State v. Clark

284 Or. App. 197 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 8, 2017

Brown, 297 Or 404 , 687 P2d 751 (1984), and State v. … State v.

Association of Oregon Corrections Employees v. State

266 Or. App. 496 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 22, 2014

E.g., Koller v. Veterinary Medical Examining Board, 243 Or App 639 , 258 P3d 1285 (2011). … E.g., Brundridge v. Board of Parole, 192 Or App 648, 656-57 , 87 P3d 703 , rev den, 337 Or 327 (2004).

Sunny Oaks, Inc. v. Dept. of Human Services

Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 29, 2023

On January 15, LR was again transported to the hospital due to vomiting and brown discharge com- ing from her nose. … See, e.g., Gleason v.

Colonial Insurance v. Allstate Insurance

90 Or. App. 564 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 20, 1988

We also agree that Shore was not driving Brown’s car with her permission and that defendant’s policy, therefore, provided no coverage. Plaintiff relies on Hawes v. … The court did not err when it concluded that Shore was not insured under Brown’s policy. Affirmed. Plaintiff contends that the family purpose doctrine should apply to this case and relies on Truck Ins. Exch. v.

State v. Ogle

46 Or. App. 109 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 12, 1980

He moved for dismissal of all three charges on the basis of State v. Brown, 262 Or 442 , 497 P2d 1191 (1972). The court dismissed the two alcohol related charges. … In State v.

State v. EHRENSING

232 Or. App. 511 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 16, 2009

Board of County Commissioners, 226 Or App 1, 5 , 202 P3d 274 (2009) (citing Oregon Medical Association v. Rawls, 281 Or 293, 296 , 574 P2d 1103 (1978)). … In McIntire v. Forbes, 322 Or 426, 434 , 909 P2d 846 (1996) (quoting Brown v.

Dental v. City of Salem

196 Or. App. 574 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 15, 2004

Brown v. Oregon State Bar, 293 Or 446, 451 , 648 P2d 1289 (1982). … Washington, 182 Or App 112, 120 , 47 P3d 537 (2002) (holding that Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision abuses its discretion only “when [it] exceeds the legal bounds on its authority’); Bi-Mart Corp. v.

Keerins v. Schiedler

132 Or. App. 560 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 1, 1995

Brown v. Baldwin, supra, 131 Or App at 360 . 2 In the light of our decision in Brown v. Baldwin, supra, we conclude that the court here erred in dismissing as untimely petitioner’s claim for post-conviction relief. … Brown v. Baldwin, supra, 131 Or App at 360-61 .

State v. Trujillo

271 Or. App. 785 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 17, 2015

He contended that Bessett “has not met the Brown /O’Key standards.” State v. Brown, 297 Or 404 , 687 P2d 751 (1984); State v. O’Key, 321 Or 285 , 899 P2d 663 (1995). … State v.

Greb v. BD. OF COM'RS FOR CTY. OF KLAMATH

32 Or. App. 39 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 16, 1978

See, Link v. City of Coos Bay, 23 Or App 648 , 543 P2d 1082 (1975). The Board is not bound by the commission’s recommendations even if supported by substantial evidence. Pohrman v. … As we stated *44 in Marracci v.

Coopman v. City of Eugene

327 Or. App. 6 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 12, 2023

Land Use Board of Appeals 2022056; A180682 534 P3d 1105 Petitioners seek review of a final order of the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) that rejected their challenge … See Stop the Dump Coalition v.

Taylor v. SAIF Corp. (In re Taylor)

295 Or. App. 199 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 5, 2018

Orders of the board must be supported by substantial reason. Long v. SAIF , 278 Or. App. 88 , 93, 372 P.3d 610 (2016) ; Hamilton v. Pacific Skyline, Inc. , 266 Or. App. 676 , 680, 338 P.3d 791 (2014). … See *422 Schoch v.

State v. Sampson

167 Or. App. 489 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 24, 2000

In State v. … Accord People v.

Acuna v. SAIF

346 Or. App. 29 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 24, 2025

Again, however, the board did not articulate how those factors weighed in its conclusion. See Taylor v. … The board provided a reasonable basis for its decision. See Weyerhaeuser Co. v.

Beeson v. Warrenton-Hammond School District

189 Or. App. 576 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 1, 2003

The district dismissed her, and she appealed her dismissal to the Fair Dismissal Appeals Board (FDAB). … Relying on its decision in Smith v. Salem-Keizer School District, No.