Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.65s
345 Or. App. 415 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 3, 2025
Applying the five-factor test set forth in Brown v. Multnomah County Dist. … Brown, 280 Or at 105-06. Defendant does not address the collateral consequences of a probation violation hearing, which likely vary from case to case, and we decline to develop that argument for him. State v.
Cited 0 timesPublished330 Or. App. 258 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 24, 2024
See State v. … State v.
Cited 10 timesPublished345 Or. App. 415 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 3, 2025
Applying the five-factor test set forth in Brown v. Multnomah County Dist. … Brown, 280 Or at 105-06. Defendant does not address the collateral consequences of a probation violation hearing, which likely vary from case to case, and we decline to develop that argument for him. State v.
Cited 0 timesPublished123 Or. App. 638 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 6, 1993
Jefferson v. Sam’s Cafe, 123 Or App 464 , 861 P2d 359 (1993).
Cited 0 timesPublished177 Or. App. 332 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 31, 2001
Brown, 297 Or at 417 . The court revisited the question of the foundation required for admissibility of scientific evidence in State v. O’Key, 321 Or 285 , 899 P2d 663 (1995). … The provisions of the Oregon Evidence Code, on which the court in Brown based its analysis, do not distinguish among different kinds of expert testimony. OEC 401; OEC 702; OEC 403. See also Daubert v.
Cited 20 timesPublishedState ex rel. Juvenile Department v. Stevens
89 Or. App. 467 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 10, 1988
He found a brown cloth pouch, some baggies and $110. The child gave Berchard permission to look inside the pouch. It contained methamphetamine. … Thompson v. IDS Life Ins. Co., 274 Or 649, 656 , 549 P2d 510 (1976); State v. Simpson, 11 Or App 271, 273, 501 P2d 1311 (1972), rev den (1973).
Cited 2 timesPublished35 Or. App. 809 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 22, 1978
Wong Sun v. United States, 371 US 471 , 83 S Ct 407 , 9 L Ed 2d 441 (1963). Miranda v. … The sentencing judge, the district attorney, the sheriff and the arresting agency shall give the board such information and indicate to the board what, in their judgment, should be the duration of such convicted person’s
Cited 7 timesPublished91 Or. App. 510 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 15, 1988
ORS 659.415; ORS 659.420; ORS 659.425. 1 The trial court found for defendants, and plaintiff appeals. 2 We review de novo, Brown v. City of Portland, 80 Or App 464 , 722 P2d 1282 , rev den 302 Or 460 (1986), and affirm. … Brown v. City of Portland, supra, 80 Or App at 469 . (Emphasis supplied.) See also Quinn v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co., 76 Or App 617, 632 , 711 P2d 139 (1985), rev den 300 Or 546 (1986).
Cited 8 timesPublishedWillamette Oaks, LLC v. City of Eugene
248 Or. App. 212 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 15, 2012
Petitioner Willamette Oaks, LLC (Willamette) seeks review of an opinion and order of the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA or board). … Ailes, 312 Or at 381 -82 (quoting State v. Brown, 310 Or 347, 355 , 800 P2d 259 (1990)).
Cited 9 timesPublished142 Or. App. 207 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 17, 1996
Advance Resorts of America, Inc. v. City of Wheeler, 141 Or App 166, 180 , 917 P2d 61 (1996); Reynolds v. State Board of Naturopathic Exam., 80 Or App 438, 441-42 , 722 P2d 739 (1986). … Brown v. Oregon State Bar, 293 Or 446, 449 , 648 P2d 1289 (1982) (citation omitted).
Cited 11 timesPublishedMiles v. BD. OF COM'RS OF CLACKAMAS COUNTY
48 Or. App. 951 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 27, 1980
Respondents are the Board of Commissioners for Clackamas County (Board). … Still v. Board of County Comm’rs, 42 Or App 115, 119-20 , 600 P2d 433 (1979), rev den 288 Or 493 (1980) (subdivision order failed to address policy issues of ORS 215.243 as required by ORS 215.213(3)(a)).
Cited 3 timesPublished139 Or. App. 156 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 28, 1996
Brown, 59 F3d 102 (9th Cir 1995); U.S. v. Hernandez-Fundora, 49 F3d 848 , amended 58 F3d 802 (2d Cir 1995), cert den _ US _, 115 S Ct 2288 (1995); Garrity v. Fielder, 41 F3d 1150 (7th Cir 1994); U.S. v. … Brown, 59 F3d at 104-05 . Rather, like prison discipline, the sanctions are part of the punishment for the earlier crimes.
Cited 5 timesPublished202 Or. App. 613 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 16, 2005
ORAP 5.45(1); State v. Brown, 310 Or 347, 355 , 800 P2d 259 (1990). … The state counters that State v.
Cited 11 timesPublished556 P.3d 663 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 28, 2024
See Brown v. Zenon, 133 Or App 291, 295, 891 P2d 666 (1995) (“[J]urisdiction attaches when a child is taken into protective custody. ORS 419B.157; ORS 419C.094. … See, e.g., State v. Yother, 310 Or App 563, 484 P3d 1098 (2021) (deciding matter submitted through Balfour process by two-judge panel); Ballinger v.
Cited 23 timesPublishedWaisanen v. Clatskanie School District 6J
229 Or. App. 563 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 15, 2009
In State v. … In Wiggett v.
Cited 0 timesPublished19 Or. App. 265 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 17, 1974
In State v. … In State v.
Cited 7 timesPublished107 Or. App. 325 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 22, 1991
The state argues that the rule would be consistent with the per se exigency rule, recognized in State v. Brown, 301 Or 268 , 721 P2d 1357 (1986), for searches of mobile vehicles. … See State v. Girard, 276 Or 511 , 514 n 2, 555 P2d 445 (1976); State v. Heikkinen, supra, n 3, 94 Or App at 475. *333 In State v.
Cited 11 timesPublishedDept. of Human Services v. T. M. G.
307 Or. App. 117 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 7, 2020
Cite as 307 Or App 117 (2020) 121 DHS similarly advocated for contact between M and her sib- lings, as did the Citizen Review Board. … State v. Clemente-Perez, 357 Or 745, 752, 359 P3d 232 (2015) (citing Peeples v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedEugene Water & Elec. Bd., an Or. Mun. Corp. v. Miller
290 Or. App. 721 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 14, 2018
See Morgan v. … ZRZ Realty v.
Cited 4 timesPublished259 Or. App. 410 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 14, 2013
The legislature also created the State Sentencing Guidelines Board (the board) to serve *413 as the administrative body that would adopt and promulgate the guidelines in the form of administrative rules. Id,.; State v. … Brown v. Oregon State Bar, 293 Or 446, 449 , 648 P2d 1289 (1982); accord Hazell v. Brown, 352 Or 455, 480 , 287 P3d 1079 (2012).
Cited 14 timesPublished
Ask Donna