Case law

Hitchcock v. McMinnville City Council

291 Or. 404 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 28, 1981

Neuberger v. … When Fasano v. Washington Co.

Klinicki v. Lundgren

298 Or. 662 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 20, 1985

Petters v. St. Cloud Enterprises, Inc., supra, applied the rule of Miller v. Miller, supra. See also Ellzey v. … However, in Rexnord, Inc. v.

State v. 1920 Studebaker Touring Car

120 Or. 254 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 30, 1926

The statute does not require it but simply requires knowledge on the part of the person having charge of the car: State v. Brown , 119 Kan. 874 ( 241 P. 112 ); State v. One 1921 Cadillac Tr. … BROWN, J., concurs in conclusion that the act is constitutional.

Van Natta v. Department of Revenue

323 Or. 62 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 21, 1996

Van Natta v. Dept. of Rev., 13 OTR 215, 219 (1995). Taxpayer then brought the present appeal. … See PGE v. Bureau of Labor and Industries, 317 Or 606, 610-12 , 859 P2d 1143 (1993) (explaining method of analyzing statutes).

Mannix v. the Portland Telegram

136 Or. 474 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 20, 1931

In Brown v. Durham, 42 S. … Belt and Brown, JJ., concur. Bean, C. J., and Campbell, J., dissent. Band and Bossman, JJ., did not participate.

State v. Anderson

239 Or. 200 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 4, 1964

Brown, Deputy District Attorney, Eugene. Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and ROSSMAN, PERRY, SLOAN, O'CONNELL, GOODWIN and DENECKE, Justices. REVERSED AND REMANDED. GOODWIN, J. … Huard v. McTeigh, 113 Or 279, 295 , 232 P 658 , 39 ALR 528 (1925).

Lopp v. First National Bank

151 Or. 634 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 11, 1935

Neither are we concerned with cases wherein the slippery condition of the floor was caused by improper oiling or dressing (McNeil v. Brown & Co., 22 *644 F. (2d) 675; Robinson v. … R. 132); Williams v. Kansas City Terminal Ry. Co., 288 Mo. 11 ( 231 S. W. 954 ); Bodine v. Goerke Co., 102 N. J. Law 642 ( 133 Atl. 295 ).

Cole v. School District No. 30

151 Or. 12 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 31, 1935

Subsequently and on July 13, 1934, the plaintiff filed in the- circuit court for Clatsop county a petition praying that an alternative writ .of mandamus be issued, requiring the defendant district and its board of directors … In Barrow v. School District No. 8, 83 Or. 272 ( 162 P. 789 ), the question was indirectly involved and, in so far as indirectly applicable to this decision, it is entitled perhaps to some weight.

Skelton v. Newberg

76 Or. 126 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 27, 1915

Co. v. Hill, 9 Or. 377, 382 , Mr. … Cable Co. v. Southern Ry. Co. (C.

Hughes v. Heppner Lumber Co.

205 Or. 11 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 29, 1955

Rayburn et ux. v. Crawford et ux., 187 Or 386, 398 , 211 P2d 483 . What is merchantable timber, in the absence of agreement, is a question of fact. We quote from Dahl et al. v. … We do not assume to enumerate all the elements involved in the term. * * *” Again, in Parsons v.

Gen. Ins. Co. v. Sask. Gov. Ins. Office

238 Or. 8 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 22, 1964

Brown, Grants Pass. Before McALLISTER, Chief Justice, and ROSSMAN, PERRY, SLOAN, O'CONNELL, GOODWIN and DENECKE, Justices. AFFIRMED. DENECKE, J. … Butenshon v. Shoesmith, 191 Or 76, 83 , 228 P2d 426 (1951).

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Jans

295 Or. 289 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 6, 1983

. <<* * * * * “(e) The court shall review the plea or stipulation and the recommendation of the Disciplinary Review Board. … 648 , 624 P2d 603 (1981) (lawyer suspended for 30 days for representing buyer and seller in property transaction); In re Bauer, 283 Or 55, 61-62 , 581 P2d 511 (1978) (lawyer acting as escrow agent not disciplined); Beal v.

State v. Phillips

314 Or. 460 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 22, 1992

See also State v. … United States v.

State v. Beauvais

357 Or. 524 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 16, 2015

See State v. Brown, 297 Or 404, 3   Defendant also was charged with two counts of attempted first-degree sex- ual abuse of JC relating to a different incident. … State v.

Miller v. Hirschberg

27 Or. 522 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 3, 1895

Smith, 25 Or. 89 ( 34 Pac. 1093 ); Cardoze v. Swift, 113 Mass. 250 . … Cort, 19 Or. 513 ( 26 Pac. 621 ); Andros v. Childers, 14 Or. 447 ( 13 Pac. 65 ); Aiken v. Coolidge, 12 Or. 244 ( 6 Pac. 712 ).

Fagerlie v. New York Life Insurance

129 Or. 485 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 1, 1929

Co. v. Price, 18 Colo. … Brown J., took no part in the consideration of this case.

Kaylor v. Recla

160 Or. 254 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 31, 1938

Mallett v. Taylor, supra; Jenkins v. Hooper Irr. Co., 13 Utah 100 ( 44 P. 829 ); McCarty v. Boise City Canal Co., 2 Idaho 245 *260 ( 10 P. 623 ). This rule was applied in principle in the case of Board of Regents v. … Turpen v. Turlock Irr. Dist. 141 Cal. 1 , 74 Pac. 295 ; Shields v. Orr Extension Ditch Co. 23 Nev. 349 , 47 Pac. 195 .” In Kall v.

Henry v. Harker

61 Or. 276 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 17, 1911

Hutchinson v. Bowler, 5 M. & W. 535; Goddard v. Foster, 17 Wall. 123 ( 21 L. Ed. 589 ). And this rule is even applied to oral contracts where their terms are not disputed. Globe Works v. … Co. v. Baker-Whitely Coal Co., 111 Md. 504 ( 75 Atl. 341 .

Baker v. Payne

22 Or. 335 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 30, 1892

(Keith v. Quinney, 1 Or. 364 .) In State ex rel. v. … (Walter A Wood Co. v. Caldwell, 54 Inch 270; 23 Am. Rep. 641 ; Stout v. Board of Comrs. 107 Ind. 343 ; 7 Rights, Rem. & Pr. § 3773; New England Car Co. v. B. & O. R. R. Co. 69 Am. Dec. 181 ; S. C. 11 Md. 81 .)

Schwab v. Moving Picture MacHine Operators Local No. 159

165 Or. 602 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 23, 1940

The National Labor Relations Board, however, had not certified the bargaining unit. A different result was reached in Oberman & Co., Inc., v. United Garment Workers, 21 F. … Supp. 20, because the National Labor Relations Board had certified the bargaining unit. After that, it was held, a dispute could no longer exist. See, to the same effect, Bloedel Donovan Lumber Mills v.