Case law

Shain v. Meier & Frank Co.

140 Or. 518 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1932

*520 BROWN, J. Section 2-801, Oregon Code 1930, defines a new trial as “a re-examination of an issue of fact in the same court after judgment.” … Co. v.

American Surety Co. v. Multnomah County

171 Or. 287 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 6, 1943

W. 797 and Stansbury v. Bank of Amory, 13 Tenn. App. 673 .” Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Hamilton National Bank, supra, 126 S. W. (2d) at p. 364 . Ford v. H. C. Brown & Co., 114 Tenn. 467 , 88 S. W. 1036 , 1 L. … Ford v. H. C. Brown & Co., supra, 88 S. W. at p. 1038.

In re Complaint as to the Conduct of Hill

295 Or. 71 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 24, 1983

On January 28,1983, the Oregon State Bar Board of Governors and the accused, Robert W. Hill, entered into a Stipulation for Discipline pursuant to Rule of Procedure 37.1. … JJj]] * * * » *77 The Disciplinary Review Board reviewed the matter and recommended to this court the acceptance of the Stipulation for Discipline.

In re Clark

374 Or. 683 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 30, 2025

State v. … See, e.g., Ligon v.

Ready v. Schmith

52 Or. 196 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 26, 1908

Brown v. Southern Pac. Ry. Co., 36 Or. 128 ( 58 Pac. 1104 : 47 L. R. A. 409: 78 Am. St. Rep. 761 ). 4. … In Kabat v. Moore, 48 Or. 191 ( 85 Pac. 506 ), referring to Section 77, B. & C. Comp, as amended (Laws 1903, p. 205), Mr.

Santoro v. Brooks

121 Or. 424 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 16, 1927

It was error for the court so to state (Wallace v. Portland Ry., L. & P. Co., 103 Or. 68 ( 204 Pac. 147 ), but such was cured by the instructions given relative to the- defense of contributory negligence. … J., and Bean and Brown, JJ., concur.

Walker v. Hewitt

109 Or. 366 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 20, 1923

To like effect see Gale v. Best, 20 Wis. 48 ; Mayers v. Rogers, 5 Ark. 417 ; Stuyvesant v. Western Mortgage Co., 22 Colo. 28 ( 43 Pac. 144 ); Woods v. Morgan, 1 Morr. (Iowa) 179; Hawley v. Bingham, 6 Or. 76 ; Sayre v. … Bean, Brown and McCourt, JJ., concur. Burnett, J., took no part in the decision of this case.

Howell v. Johnson

38 Or. 571 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1901

If the facts are admitted, or are clear and undisputed, the question is one of law for the court to- declare; but, where the proofs are conflicting, it becomes a mixed question of law and fact: Fleischner v. … Kubli, 20 Or. 328 ( 25 Pac. 1086 ); Brown v. Kimmel, 67 Mo. 430 . In such case the court should instruct the jury as to- the law upon the several hypotheses *576 of the fact insisted upon by the parties: Wiggins v.

State v. Clowes

310 Or. 686 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 26, 1990

In Doe v. … State v. Brown, 297 Or 404, 420, n 7 , 687 P2d 751 (1984). We have recognized the distinctive nature of legislative facts in several cases. See, e.g., Chartrand v.

Glaser v. Haskin

127 Or. 523 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 31, 1928

See 2 Blackstone’s Com. *445, Lewis ed., p. 901; Cornely v. Campbell, 95 Or. 345, 360 ( 186 Pac. 563 , 187 Pac. 1103 ); 40 Cyc. 263. … J., and Brown and Belt, JJ., concur.

Mutzig v. Hope

176 Or. 368 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 14, 1945

In the case of Brown v. … Brown v. Deschuttes Bridge Co., supra.

Fred Meyer, Inc. v. Bundy

Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 3, 1999

FRED MEYER, INC., Respondent on Review, v. KENNETH P. BUNDY Petitioner on Review, and DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AND BUSINESS SERVICES, Respondents. … *Judicial review from the Workers' Compensation Board. 159 Or App 44 , 978 P2d 385 (1999). **Kulongoski, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Evans v. General Trailer Co.

306 Or. 571 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 20, 1988

The claimant sought judicial review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board on April 15,1987. … Fromme v. Fred Meyer, Inc., 306 Or 558 , 761 P2d 515 (1988); Barton v. SAIF, 306 Or 567 , 761 P2d 518 (1988). The decision of the Court of Appeals awarding costs to the employer is reversed.

State v. Logston

374 Or. 101 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 31, 2025

See State v. … Engweiler v. Board of Parole, 343 Or 536, 540, 175 P3d 408 (2007). Under the indeterminate sentencing system that existed when ORS 137.123 was enacted, there was no such thing as a “sentence” of probation.

Barhan v. Bogard

128 Or. 218 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 27, 1928

See Burgett v. Burgett, 1 Ohio, 469 ( 13 Am. … Bean, Belt and Brown, JJ., concur.

State v. Schuman

47 L.R.A. 153 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 23, 1899

Ct. 224); Sayward v. Denny, 158 U. S. 180 (15 Sup. Ct. 777); Brown v. Massachusetts, 144 U. S. 573 (12 Sup. Ct. 757) ; Powell v. Brunswick County, 150 U. S. 433 (14 Sup. Ct. 166) ; Duncan v. Missouri, 152 U. … In State v. Farrell, 23 Mo.

Rust v. Pratt

157 Or. 505 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 6, 1937

State v. Driscoll, 50 Pac. (2d) 584 . “As is stated in the case of State v. … Kruckman v. Rogers, 124 Or. 656 .” In State v.

Ziegler v. Stinson

111 Or. 243 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 8, 1924

Da-vict v. Moore, 46 Or. 148 ( 79 Pac. 415); Wimer v. Smith, 22 Or. 469 (30 Pac. 416); Cawston v. Sturgis, 29 Or. 331 ( 43 Pac. 656 ). … J., and Burnett and Brown, JJ., concur.

Michelin Tire Co. v. Hurlburt

121 Or. 110 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 2, 1927

Kimball Co. v. Shawnee Co., 99 Kan. 302 ( 161 Pac. 644 , L. R. A. 1917B, 1282); Dallinger v. Rapello (C. C.), 14 Fed. 32 ; Bears v. Grand Rapids, 129 Mich. 572 ( 89 N. W. 328 ).” … McBride, Bean and Brown, JJ., concur.

CERTIFIED REALTY COMPANY v. Reddick

253 Or. 617 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 16, 1969

Goldin v. Shankroff, 125 Misc. 822 , 211 N.Y.S. 569 ; Davis v. … In Hunter v.