Case law

Woodland v. Dept. of Rev.

371 Or. 334 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 19, 2023

See, e.g., Dept. of Human Services v. P. … Penn v. Board of Parole, 365 Or 607, 613 n 2, 451 P3d 589 (2019).

Tustin v. Gaunt

4 Or. 305 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1873

(Thompson v. Multnomah County, 2 Ogn. 37; State of Oregon v. Officer, ante, p. 180; Johns v. Marion County, ante, p. 46.) … (Hahn v. Kelly, 34 Cal. 407 .)

Consor v. Andrew

61 Or. 483 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 23, 1912

Bates v. Pricket, 5 Ind. 22 ( 61 Am. Dec. 73 ) ; Adams, Assignee v. Slate, 87 Ind. 573 ; Louisville, etc., Ry. Co. v. Thompson, Adm’r, 107 Ind. 442 ( 8 N. E. 18 : 9 N. E. 357 : 57 Am Rep. 120) ; Myers v. … In Erhart v. Dietrich, 118 Mo. 418, 427 ( 24 S.

Higinbotham v. Frock

48 Or. 129 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 9, 1906

The bond for a deed transferred to the purchaser an equitable title: Burkhart v. Howard, 14 Or. 39 ( 12 Pac. 79 ); Sayre v. Mohney, 30 Or. 238 ( 47 Pac. 197 ); Security Sav. Co. v. … Mackenzie, 33 Or. 209 ( 52 Pac. 1046 ); Sievers v. Brown, 34 Or. 454 ( 56 Pac. 171 , 45 L. R. A. 642).

Milarkey v. Foster

6 Or. 378 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1877

(Brown v. Watson, 47 Me., 161.)

Honeyman v. Thomas

25 Or. 539 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 3, 1894

The courts of Pennsylvania adopted this rule in eighteen hundred and thirteen (The Olympic Theatre, 2 Browne, 275), and it has since been followed in that state, and the courts of California have approved the doctrine: Merritt … v.

Shaw v. Proffitt

57 Or. 192 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 14, 1910

To the same effect are Lavery v. Arnold, 36 Or. 84 ( 57 Pac. 906 : 58 Pac. 524 ) ; Hallock v. Suitor, 37 Or. 9, 13 ( 60 Pac. 384 ) ; Brown v. Gold Coin Mining Co., 48 Or. 277, 284 ( 86 Pac. 361 ) ; Sumpter Ry. Co. v. … A permanent way appears to have been the intention of the parties, and *217 such intention must control: Brown v. Honeyfield, 139 Iowa 414 ( 116 N. W. 731 ) ; Pifer v. Brown, 43 W. Va. 412 ( 27 S. E. 399 : 49 L. R.

Greene v. Kulongoski

322 Or. 169 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 12, 1995

See Feeney v. … See SER Acocella v.

Carson v. Gentner

33 Or. 512 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 14, 1898

In Vansickle v. … In Jones v.

Andreason v. Guard Publishing Co.

260 Or. 308 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 20, 1971

See for example, Gariepy v. Pearson, 207 F2d 15 (D.C. Cir 1953); Thackrey v. Patterson, 157 F2d 614 (D.C. Cir 1946); Hinsdale v. … Orange County Publications, Inc., 17 NY2d 284 , 270 NYS2d 592 , 217 NE2d *312 650 (1966); Brown v. DuFrey, 1 NY2d 190 , 134 NE2d 469 (1956); Sydney v.

State v. Gilbert

138 Or. 291 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1931

For former cases in support of this section, see State v. Reyner, 50 Or. 224 ( 91 P. 301 ); State v. Deal, 52 Or. 568 ( 98 P. 165 ); State v. Isley, 62 Or. 241 ( 124 P. 636 ); State v. … Rathie, 101 Or. 339 ( 199 P. 169 , 200 P. 790 ); and State v. Brennan, 111 Or. 479 ( 227 P. 275 ). In State v.

Oregon Occupational Safety & Health Division v. CBI Services, Inc.

356 Or. 577 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 26, 2014

The case is remanded to the Workers’ Compensation Board for further proceedings. ______________ *  Judicial review from Workers’ Compensation Board. 254 Or App 466, 295 P3d 660 (2013). 578 … The case is remanded to the Workers’ Compensation Board for further proceedings.

Oregon Lumber Co. v. Dwyer Overseas Timber Products Co.

280 Or. 437 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 22, 1977

Jay v. Zimmerman Co. v. General Mills, Inc., 327 F Supp 1198 (ED Mo 1973). … See Lanners v. Whitney, 247 Or 223, 234-35 , 428 P2d 398 (1967).

In Re Corcoran

215 Or. 660 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 25, 1959

The recommendation of the Board of Governors of the Oregon State Bar that Maurice C. … It is said in State v.

Holladay v. Patterson

5 Or. 177 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 15, 1874

Marsh v. … Co. v.

Durkheimer v. Copperopolis Copper Co.

55 Or. 37 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 15, 1909

V. Ry. Co. v. Berry, 31 Tex. Civ. App. 408 ( 72 S. W. 1049 ) ; Pennsylvania & Delaware Railroad Co. v. Leuffer, 84 Pac. 168 ( 24 Am. Rep. 189 ) ; State ex rel. Grocery Co. v. Judge, 108 La. 512 ( 32 South. 433 : 58 L. … Rep. 392 ) ; Meands v. Park, 95 Me. 527 ( 50 Atl. 706 ) ; Boyle v. Mountain Key Min. Co., 9 N. M. 237 ( 50 Pac. 347 ) ; M., K. & T. Ry. Co. v. Baker, 14 Kan. 563 ; Malcomson v. Wappoo Mills (C. C.) 86 Fed. 192 .

State v. Hart

299 Or. 128 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 7, 1985

United States v. … Brown, 744 F2d 905 (2nd Cir), cert den_US_ ( 105 S Ct 599 ) (1984); United States v. Florence, 741 F2d 1066 (8th Cir 1984).

McFarlane v. Cornelius

43 Or. 513 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 27, 1903

Todd, 5 Or. 36 ; Hass v. … The words “resident” and “inhabitant” not being synonymous, the latter implying a more fixed and permanent abode than the former (Board of Supervisors v.

Johnston v. Circuit Court, Mult. Co.

140 Or. 100 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 9, 1932

The record indicates that the criminal action proceeded in an orderly manner in accordance with the usual practice in that court: State v. Bateham, 94 Or. 524 ( 186 P. 5 ); State v. … Brown, J.,' concurs. Band, Bossman, Kelly and Campbell, JJ., concur in result, with separate opinions by Kelly and Band, JJ.

State v. Counts

311 Or. 616 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 1, 1991

In Carson , quoting People v. … In State v.