Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
8,515 results
1.35s
67 Or. 386 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 11, 1913
Bank v. McCullough, 50 Or. 508 ( 93 Pac. 366 , 126 Am. St. Rep. 758 , 17 L. R. A. (N. S.) 1105;, Bates v. Kempton, 73 Mass. (7 Gray) 382 ; Turpin v. Thompson, 2 Met. (Ky.) 420; Westerlo v. De Witt, 36 N. Y. 340 ( 93 Am. … Dec. 517 ); Brown v. Brown, 18 Conn. 410 ( 46 Am. Dec. 328 ). The case of Basket v. Hassell, 107 U. S. 602 ( 27 L. Ed. 500 , 2 Sup. Ct.
Cited 8 timesPublishedIn re Complaint as to the Conduct of DESBRISAY
288 Or. 625 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 26, 1980
Petitioner George V. DesBrisay seeks modification of a recommendation of the Disciplinary Review Board. ORS 9.535(3). … The Trial Board recommended a six months suspension. The Review Board recommended permanent disbarment.
Cited 2 timesPublished29 Or. 116 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 15, 1896
v. … Moore, 26 Ill. 421 ; Kelly v. Kellogg, 79 Ill. 477 ; Central Trust Company v. Chicago K. and T. Railway Company, 54 Fed. 598 .
Cited 6 timesPublishedSchool Dist. No. 9 v. MAXWELL ET UX.
189 Or. 317 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 31, 1950
189 Or. 317 (1950) 219 P.2d 155 220 P.2d 95 SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 9 v. MAXWELL ET UX. Supreme Court of Oregon. Argued March 29, 1950. Affirmed May 31, 1950. Petition for rehearing denied June 27, 1950. *319 H.T. … The board of directors of School District No. 1 were opposed to consolidation.
Cited 1 timesPublishedScandinavian-American Bank v. WentWorth Lumber Co.
101 Or. 158 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 12, 1921
Third persons may become parties to an action by motion or such other way as in the discretion of the trial court may seem proper: High on Beceivers (4 ed.), p. 162, § 139; Davis v. Gray, 16 Wall. 203 ( 21 L. … Ed. 447 ); Emphringam v. Short, 3 Hare (25 Eng. Ch. Rep.), 461, 470; Noe v. Gibson, 7 Paige Ch. (N. Y.) 513, 515, 516. See, also, Ambrose v. Brown, 42 App. Cas. (D. C.) 25, 30; Ratcliff v. Adler, 71 Ark. 269 ( 72 S.
Cited 4 timesPublishedBrandt v. Premier Insurance Co.
260 Or. 392 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 17, 1971
He spent the night of August 22 on board the vessel. The two guests arrived at 5:00 A.M. and put their fishing tackle on board. There was a heavy fog impairing navigation. … Co. v. Mathis, supra, at 225. Accordingly, we held in Murphy v.
Cited 3 timesPublished79 Or. 557 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 28, 1915
Carson & Brown and Mr. John D. Turner, with oral arguments by Mr. John A. Carson and Mr. Thomas Brown. In Banc. Mr. Justice Burnett delivered the opinion of the court. … Co., 49 Or. 477 ( 90 Pac. 903 ); Brown v. Lewis, 50 Or. 358 ( 92 Pac. 1058 ); Burnett v. Marrs, 62 Or. 598 ( 125 Pac. 838 ); Wicks v. Sanborn, 72 Or. 321 ( 143 Pac. 1007 ).
Cited 6 timesPublishedTri-County Metro. Transp. Dist. of Or. (Trimet) v. Amalgamated Transit Union Local 757
362 Or. 484 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 15, 2018
Brown v. SAIF, 361 Or 241, 260 n 6, 391 P3d 773 (2017). However, we have also emphasized that, when “the legislature uses different terms in related statutes, it likely intended them to have different meanings.” … See Brown, 361 Or at 249 (describing essential principle).
Cited 13 timesPublishedLinster v. East Lake Health Resort, Inc.
143 Or. 63 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 31, 1932
that defendants Atkinson, O’Neil, Meisted, Tyson, DeArmond and Bellett, as stockholders in defendant, East Lake Health Resort, Inc., a corporation, conspired to obtain control of said corporation by illegally electing a board … Without such substitution, the circuit court could not grant the relief plaintiff seeks (Parker v. Badger, 26 N. H. 466), and this court is without jurisdiction. Oregon Auto-Dispatch v.
Cited 4 timesPublished5 L.R.A. 115 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 20, 1889
Pegg, 18 Ind. 24 ; Goodsell v. Boynton, 1 Scam. 555 ; State v. Click, 2 Ala. 26 ; Matter of Joseph Richardson, 2 Story, 571; People v. Clark, 1 Cal. 406 ; Baker v. Compton, 52 Tex. 252 ; Logan v. … State, 52 Miss. 665 ; State v. Pritchard, 36 N. J. L. 101; Honey v. Graham, 39 Tex. 1 ; Dallam v.
Cited 59 timesPublished300 Or. 687 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 1, 1986
Sabatini v. Jayhawk Construction Co., Inc., 214 Kan. 408, 411 , 520 P.2d 1230 (1974); see also City of Lenexa v. City of Olathe, 233 Kan. 159, 164 , 660 P.2d 1368 (1983); Houman v. … EBI Companies, 295 Or. 598 , 668 P.2d 1225 (1983); Webb v. Highway Division, 293 Or. 645 , 652 P.2d 783 (1982); Brown v. Portland School Dist. #1, 291 Or. 77 , 628 P.2d 1183 (1981); Dowers Farms v.
Cited 20 timesPublishedShatzer v. Department of Revenue
325 Or. 211 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 10, 1997
In Roseburg School District v. … In Coultas v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedIn Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Smith
348 Or. 535 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 15, 2010
See In re Brown, 326 Or 582, 595 , 956 P2d 188 (1998) (so noting). … See State v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedIn Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Heider
217 Or. 134 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 8, 1959
The Board found the accused guilty of ten of the charges, not guilty of five. The Board disapproved and rejected the recommendation of the Trial Committee and recommended to this court that “the accused Otto W. … Both Trial Committee and Board of Governors found the accused guilty of the eighth cause of complaint.
Cited 14 timesPublished277 Or. 191 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 17, 1977
First, did the trial court have the power to enter its original decree restraining Newland from any further proceedings before the federal patent board? … State ex rel v. Downing, supra. See also Donovan v. City of Dallas, supra; United States v. United Mine Workers, supra; Howat v. Kansas, supra.
Cited 38 timesPublished206 Or. 221 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 11, 1956
West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette, 319 US 624, 639 , 87 L ed 1628, 63 S Ct 1178 , 147 ALR 674 . See, also, Schneider v. New Jersey, supra, 308 US at p 161 ; Thomas v. … See West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette, supra, 319 US at p 631 ; Commonwealth v. Beiler, 168 Pa Super 462, 79 A2d 134 .
Cited 22 timesPublished84 Or. 450 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 15, 1917
In Grant County v. … S.) 1051); Andrews v. Neil, 61 Or. 471 ( 120 Pac. 383 , 123 Pac. 32 ); Bowers v. Niel, 64 Or. 104 ( 128 Pac. 433 ); Wingate v. Clatsop County, 71 Or. 94 ( 142 Pac. 561 ); Stoppenback v.
Cited 15 timesPublished146 Or. 391 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 31, 1933
We quote from Greig v. … This duty is well stated in Sabin v. Wilkins, supra, and in Currie v. Bowman, 25 Or. 364 , 35 P. 848 .
Cited 7 timesPublished249 Or. 18 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 24, 1968
Also, ORS 137.510 expresses the previous holding of this court in State v. … Again, OES 144.400, which follows OES 144.390, provides that “[t]he State Board of Parole and Probation may parole a violator of parole, conditional pardon or probation” without first returning bim to the penitentiary.
Cited 2 timesPublished319 Or. 172 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 16, 1994
In re Parker, 314 Or. 143, 154-55 , 838 P.2d 54 (1992) cert. den. sub nom Parker v. Bd. of Bar Examiners, ___ U.S. ___, 113 S.Ct. 2440 , 124 L.Ed.2d 658 (1993) and Parker v. … In re Parker, 314 Or. 143, 154 , 838 P.2d 54 (1992) cert. den. sub nom Parker v. Oregon State Bd. of Bar Examiners, ___ U.S. ___, 113 S.Ct. 2440 , 124 L.Ed.2d 658 (1993) and Parker v.
Cited 15 timesPublished
Ask Donna