Case law

Green Mountain Log Co. v. Columbia & Nehalem River Railroad

141 Or. 188 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 30, 1932

Co. v. Sauk River L. Co., 160 Wash. 691 ( 295 P. 926 ). … As stated in Central Radiator Co. v. Niagara Fire Ins. Co., 109 N. J.

Ashcroft v. PSRB

Oregon Supreme Court · May 5, 2005

FILED: May 5, 2005 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON DOUGLAS ALLEN ASHCROFT, Respondent on Review, v. PSYCHIATRIC SECURITY REVIEW BOARD, Petitioner on Review. … For reasons that this court set out at greater length in Tharp v.

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Clostermann

276 Or. 261 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 23, 1976

The Disciplinary Review Board disagreed with the Trial Board and held that the accused acted reasonably in refusing to return the property, and so did not deserve to be reprimanded. We reverse. … Cf., Marnon v. Vaughan Motor Co., Inc., 189 Or 339 , 219 P2d 163 (1950); Sphier v.

Mokler v. Doun

125 Or. 595 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 19, 1928

Co. v. Dominican Sisters, 102 Or. 314 ( 202 Pac. 554 ). … Bean, Belt and Brown, JJ., concur.

Dettore v. Davenport

224 Or. 490 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 9, 1960

Mahoney v. Railroad Retirement Board, 194 F2d 752 (7th Cir 1952); Shelley v. Railroad Retirement Board, 185 F2d 239 (9th Cir 1950); Bruno v. Railroad Retirement Board, 47 F Sup 3, 4 (DC WD Pa 1942). … In the earlier case of Corkum v.

Bauman v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.

295 Or. 788 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 25, 1983

The referee, apparently relying on our decision in Frasure v. Agripac, 290 Or 99 , 619 P2d 274 (1980), found that SAIF’s denial was timely made and correct. … On the merits the Board found that the medical opinion presented at the hearing supported the conclusion that claimant’s condition was not compensable. *791 We said in Frasure v.

Rockwell v. School District No. 1

109 Or. 480 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 20, 1923

The plaintiff was employed by the school board' of the defendant district to teach for ten months at a salary of $180 per month. … Under the rule followed in Crane v. School Dist.

Fox v. Galloway

174 Or. 339 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 21, 1944

Fisher, 143 Or. 615 , 23 P. (2d) 913 ; Semler v. Oregon State Board of Dental Examiners, 148 Or. 50 , 34 P. (2d) 311 . … As was said in Brown-Forman Co. v. Kentucky, supra, [ 217 U. S. 573 , 54 L. E. 887, 30 S.

Hewitt v. Lane County

253 Or. 669 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 16, 1969

See, e.g., Draper v. Mullennex, 225 Or 267 , 357 P2d 519 (1960):. … Multnomah County v. Burbank, 235 Or 616, 618 , 386 P2d 444 (1963).

Crawford's Estate

51 Or. 76 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 11, 1908

Ed. 251 ); United States v. Gomez, 68 U. S. (1 Wall.) 690 ( 17 L. Ed. 677 ); Hewitt v. Filbert, 116 U. S. (9 Davis) 142 (6 Sup. Ct. 319: 29 L. Ed. 581 ); Brown v. McConnell, 124 U. S. (17 Davis) 489 (8 Sun. … v.

Fredericks v. Gladden

211 Or. 312 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 18, 1957

In Anderson v. … In Carpenter v.

Darling v. Christensen

166 Or. 17 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 4, 1940

L., § 72; Davis v. Davis, 20 Or. 78 ( 25 Pac. 140 ); Hawkins v. Donnerberg, 40 Or. 97 ( 66 Pac. 691 ); Ausplund v. Aetna Indemnity Co., 47 Or. 10 ( 81 Pac. 577 , 82 Pac. 12 ); Creason v. … This letter was not delivered to the addressee, but was returned to the State Land Board. We think that the deed from the State Land Board should not be invalidated. That board is not a party hereto.

Popejoy v. Boynton

112 Or. 646 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 7, 1924

Indeed, under the strict rule announced in Wilkes v. Cornelius, 21 Or. 348 ( 28 Pac. 135 ), it is doubtful whether plaintiff could have recovered for the board, laundry work and lodging. … Justice Burnett in Kelley v.

Kemppainen v. Suomi Temperance Society

128 Or. 643 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 14, 1929

A. 1917C, 1005); Harponola Co. v. Wilson, 96 Vt. 427 ( 120 Atl. 895 ); Gleason v. Brown, 129 Wash. 196 ( 224 Pac. 930 ); First State Bank of Hazen v. Radke, 51 N. D. 246 ( 199 N. W. 930 , 35 A. L. … J., and Bean and Brown, JJ., concur.

Swingle v. Medford Irrigation District

121 Or. 221 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 11, 1927

BROWN, J. … In Crow v. Abraham, 86 Or. 99 ( 167 Pac. 590 ), Mr.

State v. Allen

152 Or. 422 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 16, 1936

In State v. … In State v.

Wadhams & Co. v. State Tax Commission

202 Or. 132 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 9, 1954

OCLA § 110-609, as amended by Oregon Laws 1949, ch 98, authorized an appeal by a taxpayer who has petitioned the Board of Equalization “for a reduction and equalization of assessed valuation” from an order of the Board to … Garner v. Garner, 182 Or 549, 555 , 189 P2d 397 , and cases cited. An application of this rule in a case involving the assessment of taxes may be found in In re Blatt, 41 N Mex 269, 67 P2d 293 , 110 ALR 656 .

Skoko v. Clackamas Rural Fire Protection District No. 71

234 Or. 214 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 24, 1963

See an extensive review of the Oregon cases in Witham v. McNutt et al, 1949, 186 Or 668, 686 , 208 P2d 459 . … Witharn v. McNutt et al, supra, 186 Or 698 .

Circuit Court v. AFSCME Local 502-A

295 Or. 542 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 31, 1983

McLain v. Lafferty, 257 Or 553, 558 , 480 P2d 430 (1971). In AFSCME v. … In Norman v.

Northwest Amusement Co. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

165 Or. 284 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1940

The distinction between the case at bar and Brown v. … Case No. 1 of United Security Life Insurance Co. v. Brown, 270 Pa. St. 264, 113 Atl. 443 , which is a companion case to the one cited by plaintiff and bearing the same title, reported in 270 Pa.