Opinion

Ashcroft v. PSRB

Court
Oregon Supreme Court
Filed
May 5, 2005
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 25.8%

The opinion

FILED: May 5, 2005

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON

DOUGLAS ALLEN ASHCROFT,

Respondent on Review,

v.

PSYCHIATRIC SECURITY REVIEW BOARD,

Petitioner on Review.

(PSRB 00-1711; CA A118137; SC S51508)

En Banc

On review from the Court of Appeals.*

Argued and submitted January 5, 2005.

Katherine H. Waldo, Assistant Attorney General, Salem,

argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioner on review.

With her on the brief were Hardy Myers, Attorney General, and

Mary H. Williams, Solicitor General.

Harris S. Matarazzo, Portland, argued the cause and filed

the brief for respondent on review.

BALMER, J.

The decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed. The order

of the Psychiatric Security Review Board is vacated, and the case

is remanded to the board for further proceedings.

* Judicial Review from the Psychiatric Security Review Board.

192 Or App 467 , 86 P3d 102 (2004).

BALMER, J.

The issue in this case is whether, for purposes of ORS

161.295, alcohol dependence is a "mental disease or defect" or,

instead, is a "personality disorder." The Court of Appeals held

that it was a personality disorder.

For reasons that this court

set out at greater length in

Tharp v. PSRB

, 338 Or 413 , 338 P3d

413 (2005), we similarly conclude that alcohol dependence is a

personality disorder as that term is used in ORS 161.295(2) and

that, therefore, it is not a mental disease or defect.

Accordingly, we affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.