Case law

Wood v. Sprague

165 Or. 122 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 6, 1940

This is an action against the state: Engle v. State Land Board, 164 Or. 109 , 99 P. (2d) 1018 ; Young v. State, 36 Or. 417, 424 , 59 P. 812 , 60 P. 711 , 47 L. R. A. 548; State Land Board v. … Engle v. State Land Board, supra; Beers v. Arkansas, 20 How. 527 , 15 L. Ed. 991 ; 59 C. J., States, 306, § 462; 25 R. C. L., States, 416, § 52. Hence, we find no merit in the suggestion of unconstitutionality.

Barrow v. School Dist. No. 8

83 Or. 272 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 6, 1917

In Stackpole v. … It was approved there so far as it relates to a claim upon a contract: See, also: Philomath v. Ingle, 41 Or. 289 ( 68 Pac. 803 ); Richardson v. City of Salem, 51 Or. 125 ( 94 Pac. 34 ).

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Chambers

292 Or. 670 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 16, 1982

We agree with the Trial Board, although maybe for a different reason. The Trial Board did not expand upon the reason for its finding. … State of Oregon v.

Portland Lumbering & Manufacturing Co. v. School District No. 1

13 Or. 283 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 22, 1886

In Board etc. v. … And to these may be added the further later authorities: Board of Education v. Neidenberger, 78 Ill. 58 ; Thomas v. Board of Education, 71 Id. 283; Quinn *287 v. Allen, 85 Id. 39; Charnock v.

Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. State Tax Commission

237 Or. 143 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 18, 1964

We are aware that the review of the assessor’s work by the board of equalization ordinarily adds strength to the presumption of validity with which the assessor’s work is clothed. Southern Or. Co. v. … The taxpayer ordinarily *151 must prove that both the assessor and the board of equalization were in error before the commission can overturn the estimates of market value found by the local authorities. Case v.

Wells v. Wood

125 Or. 38 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 17, 1928

L., § 1276; Adams v. Kennard, 122 Or. 84 ( 253 Pac. 1048 ); Gilbert v. Branchflower, 114 Or. 508, 516 ( 231 Pac. 982 ); Acton v. … McBride, Brown and Belt, JJ., concurring.

Weiss v. Jackson County

9 Or. 470 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1881

Co. v. Artcher, 6 Paige, 88 ; Belknap v. Belknap, 2 Johns. Ch. … In Grigsby v.

Wychgel v. States Steamship Co.

135 Or. 475 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 14, 1930

Co. v. … Co. v. Johnson, (C. C. A.) 289 Fed 964.

Miller v. School District No. 1

106 Or. 108 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 19, 1922

Sacramento v. Bird, 15 Cal. 294 ; State v. Conkling, 19 Cal. 501 .” Roche v. Mayor, etc., 40 N. J. L. 257, 262. The decisions of our own court are in accord with the above principles: State v. … For the purposes of construction the title of a statute may be considered: Torreyson v. State Board of Examiners, 7 Nev. 19, 22.

State v. Lee Chue

130 Or. 99 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 8, 1929

The board functions as a state board, and the members of it are state officers; and we take judicial notice, not only of the existence of such board, but of the accession to office and the duration of the term of each of … Patterson: Butts v. Purdy, 63 Or. 150, 164 ( 125 Pac. 313 ). *105 Counsel for defendant cite United States v. Williams, 5 Cranch C. C. 62, 28 Fed. Cas. (No. 16,713) 660, but that case is not in point here.

Rogers v. HOLMES

214 Or. 687 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 3, 1958

Engle v. State Land Board, 164 Or 109, 115 , 99 P2d 1018 ; Wood v. Sprague, 165 Or 122, 125 , 106 P2d 287 ; Haley v. Sprague, 166 Or 320, 325 , 111 P2d 1031 ; Peters v. … Engle v. State Land Board, supra ( 164 Or at 114 ).

Trujillo v. Pacific Safety Supply

336 Or. 349 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 29, 2004

On January 20, 2000, in a brief order on review, the board affirmed. 8 C. Mount v. … For that reason, we affirm the board’s orders in Logsdon v. SAIF and Mount v. DCBS, and we affirm the decisions of the Court of Appeals in those cases. We also affirm the Court of Appeals decision in Trujillo v.

Crocker v. Weil

227 Or. 260 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 17, 1961

In Crawford v. … De Monbrun v. Sheet Metal Workers, International Ass'n., 140 Cal App2d 546, 295 P2d 881 (1956); O'Neill v. United Plumbers, Etc., 348 Pa 531, 36 A2d 325 (1944); Schrank v. Brown, *296 192 Misc 80 , 80 NYS2d 452 (1948).

Friends of Yamhill County v. Yamhill County

373 Or. 790 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 3, 2025

Board of Appeals. 325 Or App 282, 529 P3d 1007 (2023). … See Brown v.

State Ex Rel. Nilsen v. Adams

248 Or. 269 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 7, 1967

State v. Walker, 244 Or 404, 412, 413 , 417 P2d 1004 (1966); NW Ice and, Cold Stor. v. Multnomah Co., 228 Or 507, 512 , 365 P2d 876 (1961); Larson v. Heintz Const. … In McGinnis et al v.

Carlson v. Pryor

262 Or. 131 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 17, 1972

Reeves et ux v. Dickenson et ux, 208 Or 360 , 300 P2d 458 (1956); In re Wakefield’s Estate, 161 Or 330 , 87 P2d 794 , 89 P2d 592 (1939). … By the original estimate, plaintiffs would receive over 62,000 board feet. They received only 7,000 board feet. Mr.

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Langley

217 Or. 45 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1959

See State v. Langley, 214 Or 445 , 323 P2d 301 . … He thought that, since, as disclosed by our opinion in State v.

Guill v. Pendleton Woolen Mills

305 Or. 538 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 26, 1988

The proper forum to review the referee’s fee award was the board. Greenslitt v. City of Lake Oswego, 305 Or 530, 534, 535 , 754 P2d 570 (1988). See also ORS 656.382(2), 656.386(1). … The decisions of the Court of Appeals and the Workers’ Compensation Board are affirmed.

School Dist. No. 4 v. Hartong

89 Or. 155 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 18, 1918

The law is fundamental and is so decided by this court in the case of Stephens v. … This principle has been followed by numerous decisions of this court, including the case of Hughey v. Smith, 65 Or. 323 ( 133 Pac. 68 ), in which they are all collated and approved.

Christensen v. Marvin

273 Or. 97 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 9, 1975

In Lee v. Paulsen, decided this date, we held that the plaintiff teacher could not recover for defamation. … Williams v. School District of Springfield R-12, 447 SW 2d 256 (Mo 1969), quoted illustration 2 and decided for the school district.