Opinion

Guill v. Pendleton Woolen Mills

  • 305 Or. 538
  • 754 P.2d 574
  • 1988 Ore. LEXIS 236
Court
Oregon Supreme Court
Filed
Apr 26, 1988
Status
Published
Author
Peterson
On the bench
Peterson
Cited by
2 cases
Authority
More cited than 76.8%

The opinion

PETERSON, C. J.

The claimant prevailed at a hearing before the Workers’ Compensation Board referee in establishing the compensability of her injury claim. Her employer appealed to the board, which affirmed the referee on compensability but reduced the fee that the referee awarded the claimant’s attorney. The claimant seeks review of the Court of Appeals’ decision holding that the board, rather than the circuit court, had jurisdiction to review the referee’s award of attorney fees.

The employer sought review of the referee’s decision. As a result, the claimant did not prevail finally before the referee. The proper forum to review the referee’s fee award was the board. Greenslitt v. City of Lake Oswego, 305 Or 530, 534, 535 , 754 P2d 570 (1988). See also ORS 656.382(2), 656.386(1).

The decisions of the Court of Appeals and the Workers’ Compensation Board are affirmed.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.