Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
1,782 results
1.43s
Wright v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Aug 30, 2019
See Poppa v. Astrue, 569 F.3d 1167, 1169 (10th Cir. 2009); see also Bowman v. … See Tarpley v. Colvin, 601 F.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Oct 31, 2025
Kobach, 840 F.3d 710, 723 (10th Cir. 2016). 40 Does 1-11 v. Board of Regents of University of Colorado, 100 F.4th 1251, 1267 (10th Cir. 2024) (quoting Nken v. … Even in Kelo v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Apr 21, 2026
Rumsfeld v. … But on September 5, 2025, the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) determined that an immigration judge does not have authority to hear a request for bond by an alien present in the United States who has
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Mar 21, 2022
Brown v. State of Ohio, 432 U.S. 161 (1977) (citations omitted). … Anderson v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Sep 26, 2022
Martinez v. … Feb. 8, 2016) (citing Bowman v. Presley, 2009 OK 48, ¶ 13, 212 P.3d 1210, 1218). 55 State ex rel. S.W. Bell Tel. Co. v. Brown, 1974 OK 19, ¶ 19, 519 P.2d 491, 495. 56 Pl.’s Mot. (Dkt. 54), Ex.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jan 14, 2022
And in the Order and Judgment two months ago in Jones v. … Warner v. Gross, 776 F.3d at 736. V.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jan 7, 2026
The BIA’s current and historical interpretations of § 1225(b)(2)(A) and § 1226(a) On September 5, 2025, the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) ruled that an immigration judge … V.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Dec 28, 2021
Pimentel, 229 F.R.D. 208, 210 (D.N.M. 2005), Judge Browning directly addressed the question of the admissibility of affi- a. Organization of the Guard. … Doe v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Feb 4, 2025
See Malone v. … See Lay v.
Cited 0 timesUnknowniBall Instruments LLC v. Butler
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Aug 2, 2024
See id. iBall alleges that the ‘501 Patent disclosure includes the entirety of the ‘301 Provisional Patent Application, along with communications boards for connectivity to multiple cellular network carriers. … Tal v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Feb 5, 2026
The BIA’s current and historical interpretations of § 1225(b)(2)(A) and § 1226(a) On September 5, 2025, the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) ruled that an immigration judge … V.
Cited 0 timesUnknownTyler v. United States of America
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Apr 29, 2024
Stone v. … Bizzell, 117 P.2d 763, 765 (Okla. 1941) (explaining that statements made at a session before the Board of Regents to determine whether an employee’s discharge should be upheld are absolutely privileged); Dickerson v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownCMI Roadbuilding Inc v. Specsys Inc
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · May 28, 2021
V. … Brown v. Perez, 835 F.3d 1223, 1230 n.3 (10th Cir. 2016) (citations and internal quotation marks omitted).
Cited 0 timesUnknownStarr Indemnity and Liability Company v. Pacific Air Holdings LLC
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Sep 1, 2023
Co. of Okla. v. Burlington N.R. … Ratliff, 181 P.2d 545, 548 (Okla. 1947) (quoting Drumright et al. v. Brown et al., 184 P. 110, 110 (Okla. 1919)).
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Sep 3, 2025
See Thomas v. … Solomon’s private life, claims regarding testimony occurring before the Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB), and allegations regarding workers’ compensation. Id.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Apr 9, 2024
Cargle v. … United States v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jul 11, 2019
See Doc. 9, at 13–16, 26–29 (citing, among other cases, Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 (1972), and Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co., 339 U.S. 306, 314 (1950). … Koch v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jul 31, 2024
See Shaw v. … LaShonda D. v. Monroe County Board of Education, 526 U.S. 629, 640 (1999).
Cited 0 timesUnknown693 F. Supp. 2d 1280 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Feb 26, 2010
Counsel attempted to do this using a document from the Oklahoma Board of Psychologists which counsel had given Dr. Gelbort the night before, but which had not been provided to opposing counsel. … In Brady v.
Cited 1 timesPublished
Ask Donna