Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersokwd

1,782 results

0.88s

  • Sahil Sahil v. Markwayne Mullin, et al.

    District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · May 18, 2026

    Dec. 216 (BIA 2025), the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) held that those who entered the country without admission or parole are ineligible for a bond hearing and are detained under 8 U.S.C. § 1225(b)(2)(A). … v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Finstuen v. Edmondson

    497 F. Supp. 2d 1295 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · May 19, 2006

    Clark v. … Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education, 402 U.S. 1, 16 , 91 S.Ct. 1267, 1276 , 28 L.Ed.2d 554 . See Personnel Adm’r of Massachusetts v. Feeney, 442 U.S. 256, 274 , 99 S.Ct. 2282 , 60 L.Ed.2d 870 (1979).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Hernandez

    District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · May 6, 2026

    Respondents have appealed 2 the IJ’s decision and the appeal remains pending before the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA). … Hamdi v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Gatewood v. Hamidiy Inc

    District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Oct 5, 2023

    Co. v. … Brown Harris Stevens of Hamptons, LLC, No. 18-CV-01390-NRM-ST, 2023 WL 3858677, at *32–33 (E.D.N.Y. June 7, 2023); Gray v. Imperial Pac. Int’l (CNMI), LLC, No. 19-CV-00008, 2023 WL 3714156, at *18–20 (D.N. Mar. I.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Roberts

    District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jul 30, 2026

    See Brown v. Montoya, 662 F.3d 1152, 1160 n.4 (10th Cir. 2011); Atl. Richfield Co. v. … TransUnion LLC v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Moore v. Amazon.Com Inc

    District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Dec 27, 2022

    the state); accord Good v. … Int’l v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Singh

    District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Feb 12, 2026

    But on September 5, 2025, the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) determined that an immigration judge does not have authority to hear a request for bond by an alien present in the United States who has not been admitted … In Reno v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • United Food & Commercial Workers Union v. Chesapeake Energy Corp.

    281 F.R.D. 641 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Mar 30, 2012

    Robertson, Lead Plaintiffs Chairman of the Board of Trustees. Defendants appeared by their counsel of record. … See, e.g., Krim v. PcOrder.com, 402 F.3d 489 , 498-99 (5th Cir.2005); Barnes v. Osofsky, 373 F.2d 269, 272 (2d Cir.1967).

    Cited 31 timesPublished
  • Garza v. Fusion Industries, LLC

    District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Mar 31, 2023

    See Scott v. … Welcome Cntr. v. Brown, 466 U.S. 147, 149 n.3 (1984)); see also Hill v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Muniz v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

    District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Aug 11, 2023

    (quoting Brown v. Heckler, 565 F. Supp. 72, 74 (E.D. Wis. 1983)). … V.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Argenis Vizcaya Farfan v. Don Jones, et al.

    District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · May 13, 2026

    Feb. 17, 2026); see e.g., Kong v. … Id (emphasis added).5 Though Petitioner has appealed to the Board of Immigration Appeals which has yet to set a briefing schedule. Id.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Washington v. Oklahoma City City of

    District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Sep 20, 2023

    See United States v. … Eddy v. Brown, 715 P.2d 74, 77 (Okla. 1986). Even if one’s conduct is unreasonable, “[h]urt feelings do not make a cause of action under the tort-of-outrage rubric.” Id. (citing cases).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Ace Oilfield Rentals LLC v. Western Dakota and Fabrication LLC

    District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Oct 5, 2021

    Realtors v. … Fanning v. Brown, 85 P.3d 841, 846 (Okla. 2004). Here, Ace relies on a fraud theory to argue that the corporate veil of Western Dakota and WesDak should be disregarded.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Huang

    District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Mar 12, 2026

    But on September 5, 2025, the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) determined that an immigration judge does not have authority to hear a request for bond by an alien present in the United States who has not been admitted … See Sosa-Valenzuela v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Bell v. United States

    District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Sep 12, 2025

    Brown v. United States, 34 F.3d 990, 991 (10th Cir. 1994); see also United States v. Addonizio, 442 U.S. 178, 184-86 (1979). III. … Roe v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Metropolitan Life Insurance Company v. Bradshaw

    District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Mar 30, 2020

    Nat’l Bank of Shawnee v. Lindsey, 1935 OK 455, 43 P.2d 1036; U.S. Zinc Co. v. Colburn, 1927 OK 76, 255 P. 688; Stack v. Gudgel, 158 P. 1144 (Okla. 1916); White v. … Co. v. Brown, No. 2:97-cv-02002, 1998 WL 1084680, at *4 (W.D. Pa. Dec. 1, 1998) (granting summary judgment under the same circumstances).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Hutchison v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

    District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jun 9, 2023

    V. THE RFC WAS SUPPORTED BY SUSBTANTIAL EVIDENCE As stated, as part of the RFC, the ALJ concluded that Mr. … V.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Bothwell v. United States Department of Justice

    District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jul 23, 2025

    Pringle v. … See Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 285 (1979) (recognizing that “FOIA is purely a disclosure statute”); Thompson v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • CMI Roadbuilding Inc v. Specsys Inc

    District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · May 28, 2021

    v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322 (1986). … See Brown v. Wrightsman, 51 P.2d 761, 763 (Okla. 1935) (explaining that quantum meruit “applies only where there is no express contract”); Shumaker v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Hutton v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

    District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Aug 28, 2019

    Poppa v. Astrue, 569 F.3d 1167, 1169 (10th Cir. 2009). “Substantial evidence is such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.” Doyal v. … Branum v. Barnhart, 385 F.3d 1268, 1270 (10th Cir. 2004) (internal quotation marks omitted).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.