Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersoknd

884 results

0.46s

  • Byrd v. Independent School District No. 8 of Tulsa County Oklahoma

    District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Sep 30, 2024

    officials and board members; the Booster Club; and officers of the Booster Club. … Juby, vice president of the board of Sperry Public Schools; April Bowman, clerk of the board of Sperry Public Schools; Mechelle Beats, deputy clerk of the board of Sperry Public Schools; and Michelle Brown, a member

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Brackett

    District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Feb 3, 2026

    The superintendent of a school district is “the executive officer of the board of education and the administrative head of the school system,” and he “shall perform duties as the board directs.” Okla. Stat. … V.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • J. E. & L. E. Mabee Foundation, Inc. v. United States

    389 F. Supp. 673 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Jan 31, 1975

    See United States v. Robert A. Welch Foundation, 334 F.2d 774 (C.A. 5, 1964). … See also, Burnet v. Harmel, 287 U.S. 103, 110 , 53 S.Ct. 74 , 77 L.Ed. 199 (1932); Palmer v. Bender, 287 U.S. 551, 555 , 53 S.Ct. 225 , 77 L.Ed. 489 (1933); and Carr Staley, Inc. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Emrit

    District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Jun 23, 2026

    See Brown v. Eppler, 725 F.3d 1221, 1230–31 (10th Cir. 2013) (noting that authorization to proceed in forma pauperis only excuses prepayment of the filing fee). … Commil USA, LLC v. Cisco Sys., Inc., 575 U.S. 632, 647 (2015).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Emrich Aerial Spraying LLC v. The City of Pawhuska, Pawhuska Municipal Airport Authority, and Pawhuska Municipal Airport Advisory Committee

    District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Oct 23, 2025

    Brown, 317 U.S. 341 (1943), or from damages under the Local Government Antitrust Act of 1984, 15 U.S.C. § 34–36. … ‘must 17 The complaint mentions that Emrich originally negotiated with Kevin Brown about partnering with his company, Bluestem Aerial, to expand into Oklahoma, but Brown later sold Bluestem and kept a percentage of profits

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Mahadevan v. Bikkina

    District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Sep 16, 2024

    Brown v. Baeke, 413 F.3d 1121, 1123 (10th Cir. 2005) (quoting Phillips USA, Inc. v. Allflex USA, Inc., 77 F.3d 354, 357 (10th Cir. 1996)). “Dismissal under Rule 41(a)(2) is within the sound discretion of the court.” … Brown, 413 F.3d at 1123 (quoting Ohlander v. Larson, 114 F.3d 1531, 1537 (10th Cir. 1997)). As previously stated, Mr. Mahadevan objects to dismissal of this matter. However, Mr.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Foster v. Midland Valley Railroad

    245 F. Supp. 60 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Sep 9, 1965

    In Scot Typewriter Co. v. … Kelly v. United States Steel Corp., 3 Cir., 284 F.2d 850 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Hillyer v. Pan American Petroleum Corp.

    225 F. Supp. 425 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Dec 20, 1963

    In Russell v. Barnes Foundation, (D.C. … See Carpenter v. Josey Oil Company (8 Cir.), 26 F.2d 442 ; Federal Royalty Company v. Knox and Others (5th Cir.), 114 F.2d 78 .

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Heckelmann v. Piping Companies, Inc.

    904 F. Supp. 1257 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Jul 14, 1995

    Franchise Tax Board v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust, 463 U.S. 1, 9-10 , 103 S.Ct. 2841, 2846 , 77 L.Ed.2d 420 (1983). … Moore v. Chesapeake & Ohio R.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Audacity Church v. Church Mutual Insurance Company

    District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Jan 21, 2022

    Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322-23 (1986); Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 250 (1986); Kendall v. Watkins, 998 F.2d 848, 850 (10th Cir. 1993). … Ball v. Wilshire Ins. Co., 221 P.3d 717, 724 (Okla. 2009).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Tretolite Co. v. Darby Petroleum Corp.

    5 F. Supp. 445 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Jan 9, 1934

    Powell v. Leicester Mills (C. C.) 92 F. 115 ; Foote v. Parsons, supra (C. C. A. 6) 196 F. 951 ; Allington v. Shevlin-Hixon Co. (D. C.) 2 F.(2d) 747 ; Leaver v. K. & L. Box & Lbr. Co. (D. C.) 6 F.(2d) 666 ; Whittaker v. … A. 8) 43 F.(2d) 485, 489, 490 ; Rheinberger v. Security Life Insurance Co. (D. C.) 4 F. Supp. 824 ; King v. Barr (C. C. A. 9) 262 F. 56 ; Board of Drainage Commissioners v. Lafayette Southside Bank (C. C.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Banks v. Hayes

    District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Oct 22, 2020

    at county jail); Edelen v. … Sawyers v. Norton, 962 F.3d 1270, 1279 n.4 (10th Cir. 2020). Plaintiffs’ claim against the Board is simply another way to sue the county, but plaintiffs do not allege a separate basis for liability against the Board.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Sutton v. Kiefer Public Schools

    District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Dec 2, 2022

    P. 56(a) by Defendants Kiefer Public Schools (KPS), Kiefer Public School Board of Education (KPS Board), and Mary Murrell, in her individual and official capacity as KPS Superintendent (collectively, Defendants … Comm’rs of Bryan Cnty., Okla. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 407 (1997). “Actions and decisions by officials that are merely inept, erroneous, ineffective, or negligent do not amount to deliberate indifference.” Doe v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Bristow First Assembly of God v. BP p.l.c.

    District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Mar 2, 2023

    Albert v. Alex. Brown Mgmt. Servs., Inc., 2005 WL 2130607, at *8-9 (Del. Ch. Aug. 26, 2005). Plaintiffs do not argue Kinder Morgan acted as EPEC Oil’s agent. … He and his board “all knew it was an old refinery.”

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Reiland v. Independent School District No. 11 of Tulsa County, Oklahoma

    District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Nov 14, 2022

    (citing Grattan v. Board of School Com’rs of Baltimore City, 805 F.2d 1160, 1163 (4th Cir. 1986)). … Even if “given broad permission to write the board or send a representative to the board meetings on [his] behalf, these do not constitute adequate alternative channels of communication.” See Wilson v. N.E. Indep.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Rhoades

    District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · May 1, 2026

    the Board of County Commissioners.1 [Doc. 1-4]. … Further, the evidence relied on by defendants was submitted by co-defendant the Board for the first time in reply.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Thomas v. Oklahoma Power & Water Co.

    20 F. Supp. 246 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Aug 9, 1937

    Board of Com’rs of Kiowa County v. Kiowa National Bank, 141 Okl. 271 , 284 P. 634 ; Oklahoma City v. District Court, 168 Okl. 235 , 32 P.(2d) 318, 93 A.L.R. 489 ; Oklahoma City v. Rose, 176 Okl. 607 , 56 P.(2d) 775. … Among these cases may be cited the following: Nashville v. Webb, 114 Tenn. 432 , 85 S.W. 404 , 4 Ann.Cas. 1169; Pack v. Greenbush Tp., 62 Mich. 122 , 28 N.W. 146 ; Simpson v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Chellen v. John Pickle Co., Inc.

    446 F. Supp. 2d 1247 · District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Aug 22, 2006

    Figures v. Board of Public Utilities of Kansas City, Kan., 731 F.Supp. 1479, 1483 (D.Kan.1990). … Eddy v. Brown, 715 P.2d 74, 77 (Okla.1986) (quoting Restatement of Torts (Second), § 46, comment d). Personal Liability of John Pickle 60.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Reiland v. Independent School District No. 11 of Tulsa County, Oklahoma

    District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Nov 1, 2022

    After the Board meeting, Plaintiff waited in the parking lot for OPS Board member, Brent England, to inquire further about the Board’s decision that evening. Id. … Under Defendants’ ban, Plaintiff is no longer able to attend OPS Board meetings or meet with OPS Board members on OPS grounds, thus chilling Plaintiff’s ability to criticize Board decisions and to “petition the [Board]

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Delaney v. City of Tulsa, Oklahoma

    District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Feb 11, 2025

    its lights on—in the street in front of the home at which Brown was located. … TPD's Internal Affairs division—specifically, its Deadly Force Review Board—also reviewed the events of March 21, 2020.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.