Case law

Adams v. White

40 Okla. 535 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 4, 1913

Other cases in point are: Pierce v. Brown, 7 Wall. 205, 19 L. Ed. 134 ; Iron Works v. Cohen, 7 Colo. App. 341, 43 Pac. 667 ; Dalrymple v. Security Loan & Trust Co., 11 N. D. 65 , 88 N. W. 1033 ; Hays et al. v. … E. 386 ; Story v. Black, 5 Mont. 26 , 1 Pac. 1 , 51 Am. Rep. 37 ; Mining Co. v. Bank, 7 Mont. 530, 19 Pac. 210 ; Dimmick v. Rosenfield, 34 Ore. 101 , 55 Pac. 100 ; Kirby v. Tallmadge, 160 U. S. 379 , 16 Sup.

Fenton v. Young Chevrolet Co.

191 Okla. 161 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 30, 1942

Olson v. Thompson, 6 Okla. 576 , 52 P. 388 ; Brook v. Bayless, 6 Okla. 568 , 52 P. 738 ; Chadwell v. Brown, 88 Okla. 44 , 211 P. 410 . In the case of King v. … Poe v. Continental Oil & Cotton Co. (Tex. Com. App.) 231 S. W. 717 ; Ryerson & Son v. Smith, 152 Ill. 645 ; Interstate Contr. & S. Co. v. Belleville Sav. Bk., 197 Ill. App. 30 ; National Oxygen Co. v. Roach, 251 Ill.

Regan v. Gurich

905 P.2d 796 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 17, 1995

II, § 6; Brown v. Burkett, 750 P.2d 481, 483 (Okla.1988); McMullin v.

Bass Harbour Furniture and Carpet Co. v. Harbour

42 Okla. 335 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 17, 1914

McCloskey v. Davis, 8 Ind. App. 190 , 35 N. E. 187 ; Central of Ga. Ry. v. Morgan, 110 Ga. 168 , 35 S. E. 345 ; Railway Co. v. Thomason, 59 Ark. 140 , 26 S. W. 598 ; Douglass v. Hill, 29 Kan. 527. … Allison v. Bryan, 26 Okla. 520 , 109 Pac. 934 .

Boardman v. Oklahoma City Housing Authority

445 P.2d 412 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 24, 1968

McCrady v. Western Farmers Electric Cooperative, Okl., 323 P.2d 356, 359 . In Isaacs v. … In Armstrong v. Sewer Improvement Dist.

In Re Gypsy Oil Co.

141 Okla. 298 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 10, 1929

We had this contention under considera- ‘ tion in cause No. 20142, Coggeshall & Co. v. … This contention is fully covered by our discussion in cause No. 20142, Coggeshall & Co. v.

STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. KUTNER

506 P.3d 370 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 28, 2022

OBA v. … OBA v. Combs , 2007 OK 65 175 P.3d 340 ¶13 In State ex rel. OBA v.

FRANKENBERG v. STRICKLAND

2015 OK 23 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 21, 2015

DON FRANKENBERG and MARY FRANKENBERG, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. BEVERLY STRICKLAND, County Assessor, Defendant-Appellant, GARVIN COUNTY BOARD OF EQUALIZATION, Defendant. … Sheffer v. Carolina Forge Co. , 2013 OK 48, ¶ 10, 306 P.3d 544, 547-48.

Lanham v. McKeel

47 Okla. 348 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 4, 1915

Such was, *350 in effect, our holding in Baker v. Hammett et al., 23 Okla. 480 , 100 Pac. 1114 , following Taylor v. Brown, 147 U. S. 640 , 13 Sup. Ct. 549, 37 L. Ed. 313 .

Combs v. Johnson

92 Okla. 189 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 25, 1923

Marcy v. Board of Commissioners, supra; United States v. Shock, 187 Fed. Rep. 870.” Entertaining a like view of the proviso, we conclude that the land covered by the lease is still restricted land. … It is seen from the above quotation that the case of Marcy v. Board of County Commissioners, supra, and United States v. Shock, 187 Fed.

Rogers v. Meiser

74 O.B.A.J. 967 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 4, 2003

See Tate v. Browning-Ferris, Inc., supra, 833 P.2d at 1225 -1226 and £.n.36. … Brown v.

Development Industries, Inc. v. City of Norman

412 P.2d 953 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 29, 1966

Application of Reynolds, Okl.Cr., 328 P.2d 441 ; Makrauer v. Board of Adjustment of City of Tulsa, et al., 200 Okl. 285 , 193 P.2d 291 . The zoning statutes are 11 O.S.1961, Secs. 401 to 425, inclusive. … In Bauman v. State ex rel.

Appeal of Crescent Precision Products, Inc.

516 P.2d 275 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 13, 1973

Constitutional Law § 48; Latting v. Cordell, 197 Okl. 369 , 172 P.2d 397, 399 ; 16 Am.Jur.2d Constitutional Law, § 94, 51 Am.Jur. Taxation, § 500. … See, for instance, Board of Com’rs of Comanche County v.

McMasters v. English

26 Okla. 818 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 12, 1910

Marvel v. White. 5 Okla. 739 , 50 Pac. 87 ; Board of County Commissioners, etc., v. Oxley, 8 Okla. 502 , 58 Pac. 651 .

Farris v. Smallwood

204 Okla. 123 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 13, 1951

Defendants cite Kelly v. Choate, 192 Okla. 397 , 136 P. 2d 885 , and Arbuckle Realty Trust v. … Defendant also cites Reinhart & Donovan Co. v. Missouri, K. & T. Ry.

Noble Bros. v. Ballew

59 Okla. 90 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 6, 1916

was, by the court, sustained, over the objection of counsel for the plaintiffs, and exceptions duly saved, and the jury, under the instructions of the court, returned a verdict for the defendant for the recovery of the brown … Kan., v. Stephenson et al., 23 Okla. 695 102 Pac. 992 ; Bohannon v. Jennings, 31 Okla. 254 , 121 Pac. 195 ; McKinney v. Purcell, 28 Kan. 446 . In this connection see the case of Hamill et al. v.

IN THE MATTER OF THE INCOME TAX PROTEST OF HARE

398 P.3d 317 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 27, 2017

Fanning v. Brown, 2004 OK 7, ¶ 10 , 85 P.3d 841, 845-46 . Rules of construction are not utilized if the language in a statute is unambiguous. Lang v. … Patterson v.

Brocker, Adm'r v. Stallard

34 Okla. 612 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 17, 1912

In Brown v. … In Gutziet v.

Comanche County v. American Nat. Bank of Lawton

122 Okla. 34 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 21, 1926

Board of Commissioners of Oklahoma County v. Ryan, 107 Okla. 278 . 232 Pac. 834 . … Bank v. Britton, 105 U. S. 322, 324 , 20 L.

Of School District No. 9 v. Jones

193 Okla. 9 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 11, 1943

See Harris et al. v. District Court in and for Nowata County, 68 Okla. 231 , 173 P. 69 ; House et al. v. Musick, County Superintendent of Public Instruction, 185 Okla. 264 , 91 P. 2d 676 . … 'The proceedings on the return are confined solely to the record of the lower court or tribunal. *13 See Southern National Bank v. Wallace, 63 Okla. 206 , 164 P. 461 ; Lennon v.