Opinion

Regan v. Gurich

  • 905 P.2d 796
  • 1995 WL 610626
Court
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Filed
Oct 17, 1995
Status
Published
On the bench
Hargrave, Hodges, Kauger, Lavender, Motion, Opala, Publication, Record, Simms, Summers, Watt, Wilson
Cited by
0 cases
Authority
More cited than 23.0%

The opinion

ORDER

The Motion to Supplement Record tendered by respondent/State Insurance Fund is granted.

Original jurisdiction is assumed. Let the writ of mandamus issue. The respondent/judge of the Workers’ Compensation Court is hereby directed to set for hearing the petitioner’s Motion to Reopen for change of condition for the worse in Court Number 92-14325A. The trial judge was in error when she denied the petitioner the status of a pauper solely on the basis of his being represented by counsel. The fact that the petitioner is represented by counsel does not in and of itself foreclose his right to proceed in forma pauperis. Okla. Const, art. II, § 6; Brown v. Burkett, 750 P.2d 481, 483 (Okla.1988); McMullin v. Department of Corrections, 863 P.2d 1187, 1189 (Okla.1993).

*797 ALMA WILSON, C.J., KAUGER, Y.C.J., HODGES, LAVENDER, SIMMS, HARGRAVE, OPALA and WATT, JJ., concur on Motion to Supplement Record and For Publication.

SUMMERS, J., dissents on Motion to Supplement Record and For Publication.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.