Case law

Sinor's Long Bay Marina, LLC v. Wagoner County Rural Water District No. 2

335 P.3d 262 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 27, 2014

REIF, V.0.J.; 1 This case concerns the rate charged by Wagoner County Rural Water District No. 2 for water service provided to recreational vehicle parks within the District. … (Emphasis added). 15 Under section 1824.11(C), the district's board of directors can review and adjust rates "as deemed necessary."

Regan v. Gurich

905 P.2d 796 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 17, 1995

II, § 6; Brown v. Burkett, 750 P.2d 481, 483 (Okla.1988); McMullin v.

Brocker, Adm'r v. Stallard

34 Okla. 612 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 17, 1912

In Brown v. … In Gutziet v.

Comanche County v. American Nat. Bank of Lawton

122 Okla. 34 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 21, 1926

Board of Commissioners of Oklahoma County v. Ryan, 107 Okla. 278 . 232 Pac. 834 . … Bank v. Britton, 105 U. S. 322, 324 , 20 L.

In Re Assessment of First Nat. Bank of Chickasha

58 Okla. 508 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 10, 1916

Laws 1915, the bank prosecuted its appeal to the district court of Grady county, where the action of the county board was reversed, and said board was directed to deduct from the valuation of the bank the amount invested … From the order and judgment of the district court, the county board of equalization, and the board of county commissioners of Grady county, and the State of Oklahoma, have appealed to this court.

STEVENS v. FOX

383 P.3d 269 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 11, 2016

In Board of Trustees of Judicial Form Retirement System v. … Board of Trustees of Judicial Form Retirement System v. Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Kentucky, 132 S.W.3d 770, 778 (Ky. 2003). (Emphasis added).

Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. Richardson

273 P.3d 50 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 28, 2012

Fent v. Contingency Review Board, 2007 OK 27, ¶ 7 , 163 P.3d 512, 519-520 . In essence, a plaintiff who has not suffered an injury attributable to the defendant lacks standing to bring a suit. … Lujan v.

KINGFISHER WIND v. WEHMULLER

2022 OK 83 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 18, 2022

P ., v. Tennessee State Board of Equalization , 2003 WL 23099679 (Tenn. Ct. … In Rainbow Apartments v. Illinois Property Tax Appeal Board , 326 Ill. App.3d 1105 , 260 Ill.

BOLER v. SECURITY HEALTH CARE, L.L.C.

2014 OK 80 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 30, 2014

Brown and Root, Inc., 1992 OK 114 , ¶ 13, 836 P.2d 1298, 1301 . See also Haws v. Luethje, 1972 OK 146, ¶ 13 , 503 P.2d 871 . … See Marmet Health Care Ctr., Inc. v. Brown, __ U.S. __, 132 S.Ct. 1201 , 182 L.Ed.2d 42 (2012)(per curiam).

Perry v. City of Oklahoma City

470 P.2d 974 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 7, 1970

in the Board of Unexplained Deaths Laboratory and Information Center. … V, § 57.

Application of Devilliers

527 P.2d 1139 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 5, 1974

This required the Board of Governors to strike him from the membership roll. … This resulted in another opinion being issued by the Tenth Circuit Federal Court of Appeals, Atlas Corporation v. DeVilliers, 447 F.2d 799 (1971).

Liberty Central Trust Co. v. Methodist Episcopal Church

201 Okla. 29 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 26, 1948

of Trustees is the testimony of the writer that he thought the Board authorized him to write it. … Agency, 252, §315; Incorporated Town of Locust Grove v. Faull, 174 Okla. 466 , 50 P. 2d 1122 .

In Re Humphrey's Estate

193 Okla. 151 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 5, 1943

Among ' the cases so cited are Whitaker’s Estate, 175 Pa. 139 , 34 Atl. 572 ; Moore v. Ranken, 172 N. C. 599 , 90 S. E. 759 ; Witherspoon v. Jernigan, 97 Tex. 98 , 76 S. W. 445 , and Broward v. … J. p. 836, § 62; In re Way’s Estate, Love v. Brown, 29 Cal. A. 2d 669, 85 P. 2d 563 ; In re Way’s Estate, Love v. Jackson, 29 Cal. A. 2d 677, 85 P. 2d 567 ; Draper v. Draper, 174 Tenn. 394 , 126 S. W. 2d 307 .

Price v. Christian

373 P.2d 1017 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 16, 1962

instead of the Secretary of the Election Board. … Coe v. State Election Board, 203 Okl. 356 , 221 P.2d 774 ; Cornell v. McAlister, 121 Okl. 285 , 249 P. 959 .

In Re Williams

174 Okla. 386 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 29, 1935

It has been said (Hunter v. Troup, 315 Ill. 293 , 146 N. … OSBORN, V. C. .T., and RILEY, PHELPS. CORN, and GIBSON. ,T.T„ concur. BUSBY and WELCH, JJ., absent.

Adams Royalty Co. v. Faulkner

176 Okla. 423 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 3, 1936

In Brown v. … Brown v. Rhodes, 1 Kan. 359 ; Gallaher v. Southwood, Id. 143; Lownsberry v. Rakestraw, 14 Kan. 151 -154; State v. Bohan, 19 Kan. 48 . “The rule prescribed by the statute is a reasonable one.

Morton v. Gilbert

201 Okla. 599 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 7, 1949

The case of Midland Savings & Loan Co. v. … The facts in this case bring it squarely within the rule of Wall v. Snider, 93 Okla. 97 , 219 P. 671 . The same rule was applied in the earlier case of Brown et al. v.

Skien v. Junction Oil & Gas Co.

80 Okla. 41 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 7, 1920

It was admitted that the plaintiffs had brought their suit originally upon the theory that the lease was an optional contract, and under the holding of this court in the ease of Brown v. … Wilson, 58 Okla. 392 , 160 Pac. 94 , the same might have been canceled, but since the case of Brown v. Wilson has been overruled, this proposition has been eliminated from the ease.

Whayne v. Seamans

95 Okla. 168 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 26, 1923

Brown, guardian of Walton Carney, filed his petition in the county court of Pittsburg county praying for authority to sell a lease on said land’. … Parker, Superintendent of the Five Civilized Tribes, informing him he claimed an interest in the lease made by Brown, as guardian, to Seamans.

Independent School Dist. No. 1 of Custer County v. Williamson

262 P.2d 701 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 27, 1953

Co. v. Excise Board of Bryan County, 181 Okl. *703 229 , 73 P.2d 173, 175 . The cited case was decided prior to the passage of the above quoted statute. … Dowell v. Board of Education, supra [ 185 Okl. 342 , 91 P.2d 771 ]; Musick v. *704 State, 185 Okl. 140 , 90 P.2d 631 ; School District No. 17 v. Zediker, 4 Okl. 599 , 47 P. 482 ; Southern Pac. Co. v.