Case law

Hoteling v. McCarty

46 Okla. 541 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 18, 1915

Counsel for defendants cite McKallip v. … In Cobb v.

McCulloch v. Perry

150 Okla. 203 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 7, 1931

Bank of Allen v. … And in the case of Cromwell v.

OKLAHOMA CALL FOR REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE v. DRUMMOND

2023 OK 111 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 14, 2023

OKLAHOMA CALL FOR REPRODUCTIVE JUSTICE v. … Burns v.

Gardner, County Judge v. State Ex Rel.

27 Okla. 1 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 12, 1910

Territory of Oklahoma, 12 Okla. 621 , 73 Pac. 273 , and Rhea v. Board of County Commissioners, 12 Idaho, 455 , 88 Pac. 89 . … of Rhea v.

Application of Balch

506 P.2d 1384 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 6, 1973

We approve the findings of the Board of Governors that applicant has not undergone rehabilitation. … Recommendation of the Board of Governors that Stanley Norris Balch not be reinstated to the practice of law approved. DAVISON, C. J., WILLIAMS, V. C. J., and BERRY, HODGES, LAVENDER, BARNES and DOOLIN, JJ., concur.

Blake v. Abraham

149 Okla. 112 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 26, 1931

Payne, 123 Okla. 137, 252 , Pac. 423, and Eaton v. Frisco Ry. Co., 122 Okla. 143 , 251 Pac. 1032 . … Co. v.

Muskogee Electric Traction Co. v. Mueller

39 Okla. 63 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 22, 1913

That the fact that her small grandson boarded the car exactly at the time she was struck would be, at least, a slight circumstance tending to show that she was also endeavoring to board the car, rather than that she ran in … An instruction very similar was approved in Norton v. Volzke, 158 Ill. 402 , 41 N. E. 1085 , 49 Am. St. Rep. 167 ; North Chicago Street Ry. Co. v. Fitzgibbons, 180 Ill. 466 , 54 N. E. 483 ; Richardson v.

Strong v. Day

61 Okla. 166 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 24, 1916

Y. 113 ; Coleman v. Eaker, 111 Ky. 131 , 63 S. W. 484 ; Lynn v. Adams, 2 Ind. 143 ; McConnell v. Dewey, 5 Neb. 385 ; Dunlap v. Knapp, 14 Ohio St. 64 , 82 Am. Dec. 468 ; Tearney v. Smith, 86 Ill. 391 ; Allen v. … Laws 1910: “All bridges more than 20 feet long shall be under the control and supervision of the board of county commissioners.” By section 1600, Rev.

City of Norman v. Van Camp

87 Okla. 182 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 3, 1922

This court sustained the lower court, same being the ease of City of Norman v. Allen, 47 Okla. 74 , 147 Pac. 1002 . … In City of Norman v. Allen, 47 Okla. 74 , 147 Pac. 1002 , supra, paragraphs 2 and 3 of the syllabus read: “2.

State Ex Rel. Town of El Dorado v. Williamson

177 Okla. 526 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 16, 1936

See Board of Education v. Short, 89 Okla. 2 , 213 P. 857 . … National Surety Co. v. State, 111 Okla. 180 , 239 P. 257 ; State v. McCurdy, 115 Okla. 111 , 241 P. 816 .

Cleveland v. School Dist. No. 79, Grady County

51 Okla. 69 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 10, 1915

W. 822 ; Guthrie v. T. W. Harvey Lumber Co., 9 Okla. 464 , 60 Pac. 247 ; City of Guthrie v. Wylie, 6 Okla. 61 , 55 Pac. 103 ; Abbott v. Omaha Smelting Co., 4 Neb. 416 . In Abbott v. … the name of the village, its metes and bounds, and that then, and not until then, might said board declare the said proposed village incorporated.

Lamont Gas & Oil Co. v. Doop & Frater

39 Okla. 427 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 23, 1913

v. … W. 531 ; Geismann et al. v. Trish, 163 Mo. App. 308 , 143 S. W. 876 ; Haven v. Brown, 7 Me. (7 Greenl.) 421, 22 Am. Dec. 208 ; Dodd v. Witt, 139 Mass. 63 , 29 N. E. 475 , 52 Am. Rep. 700 . The case of Fayter v.

Nance v. State

122 Okla. 36 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 14, 1926

Brown v. Oklahoma City, 107 Okla. 252 , 231 Pac. 855 .

Sweitzer v. Territory of Oklahoma

5 Okla. 297 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 12, 1897

. § 155; Schilling v. Territory, [Wash. T.], 5 Pac. 926 ; State v. Light, [Or.], 21 Pac. 132 .) … (McDonald v. State, 80 Wis. 407 ; In re. Ryan, 80 Wis. 414 ; State v. Brown, 33 S. C. 151; St. Louis R. Co. v. Gill, 54 Ark. 101 ).

Protest of First Nat. Bank

143 Okla. 115 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 6, 1930

This is an appeal from the judgment of the Court of Tax Review dismissing the protest of the First National Bank of Enid, Okla., against the application of a legal rate of ad valorem tax levy fixed by the excise board of … LESTER, V. C. J., and CLARK, RILEY, HEFNER, CULLISON, and SWINDALL, JJ., concur. MASON, C. J., and HUNT, J., absent. Note. See "Taxation," 37 Cyc. p. 1087, n. 46. *Page 116

Shaffer v. Govreau

36 Okla. 267 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 26, 1912

Grimes v. Tait, 21 Okla. 361 , 99 Pac. 810 . … Co. v. Rodenhouse, ante, 128 Pac. 502 ; Hegard v. California Ins. Co. (Cal.) 11 Pac. 594 ; Patterson v. M., K. & T. Ry. Co., 24 Okla. 747 , 104 Pac. 31 ; Grandstaff v. Brown, 23 Kan. 175 .

Oklahoma City v. State Industrial Com.

147 Okla. 261 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 3, 1931

In the case of Board of Commissioners of Pawnee County v. … In the case of Board of Commissioners of Okmulgee Co. v. State ex rel.

Douthit v. Baldwin

114 Okla. 127 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 9, 1926

In the case of Mitchell v. … Graham v. City of Greenville, 67 Tex. 62 , and authorities there cited. * * * In the case of Graham v.

Baylis v. City of Tulsa

780 P.2d 686 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 13, 1989

Smartt v. Board of County Commissioners of Craig County, 67 Okl. 141, 169 P. 1101 (1917); Protest of Kansas City Southern Ry. Co., 157 Okl. 246 , 11 P.2d 500 (1932); Hillcrest Medical Center v. … Graves v. Board of Commissioners of Cimarron County, 170 Okl. 282 , 39 P.2d 532 (1934); Deal v. Excise Board of Pontotoc County, 179 Okl. 73 , 64 P.2d 859 (1937); Board of County Commissioners of Okmulgee County v.

Fabric Fire Hose Co. v. Town of Caddo

59 Okla. 89 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 6, 1916

Johnson v. Board, 7 Okla. 686 , 56 Pac. 701 : Board of Com’rs v. DeLana, 8 Okla. 215 , 57 Pac. 162 ; State Bank of Miami v. City of Miami, 48 Okla. 809 , 144 Pac. 597 .