Opinion

Protest of First Nat. Bank

  • 143 Okla. 115
  • 287 P. 1043
  • 1930 OK 228
  • 1930 Okla. LEXIS 571
Court
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Filed
May 6, 1930
Status
Published
On the bench
ANDREWS, J.
Cited by
2 cases
Authority
More cited than 62.9%

The opinion

This is an appeal from the judgment of the Court of Tax Review dismissing the protest of the First National Bank of Enid, Okla., against the application of a legal rate of ad valorem tax levy fixed by the excise board of Garfield county, Okla., to the property of the protestant. The Court of Tax Review dismissed the protest on the ground that that court was without jurisdiction to determine the issue presented.

The protestant contends that the rate of levy fixed by the excise board of Garfield county for ad valorem tax purposes could not be lawfully applied to its property because the rate so fixed was excessive and in violation of section 5219, Rev. Stat. of the United States, as amended by the Act of March 4, 1923, and section 9607, C. O. S. 1921.

The issue presented was determined by this court in Protest of First Nat. Bank of Guthrie, 136 Okla. 141 , 276 P. 766 , wherein this court held that the Court of Tax Review has no jurisdiction to review the application of a legal rate of ad valorem tax levy to specific property or to determine whether or not specific property is subject thereto. That decision is controlling.

The judgment of the Court of Tax Review is affirmed.

LESTER, V. C. J., and CLARK, RILEY, HEFNER, CULLISON, and SWINDALL, JJ., concur. MASON, C. J., and HUNT, J., absent.

Note. See "Taxation," 37 Cyc. p. 1087, n. 46. *Page 116

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.