Case law

Territory of Oklahoma Ex Rel. Taylor v. School District No. 83

10 Okla. 556 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 8, 1901

. *561 It was said in Clark v. … It was held in Morrison v. Bachect, 112 Pa.

In Re Williams

172 Okla. 608 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 18, 1935

Respondent further contends that: “The findings and recommendations of the *610 Board of Governors is wholly unjustified and not sustained- by. competent evidence.” .. … J., OSBORN, V. C. J., and RILEY, BAYLESS, BUSBY, CORN, and GIBSON, JJ., concur. WELCH, J., absent.

Crews v. Johnson

46 Okla. 164 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 27, 1915

The question on which the case of School Board Dist. No. 18, Garvin County, Okla., et al v. J. B. Thompson et al., 24 Okla. 1 , 103 Pac. 578 , 24 L. R. A. (N. S.) 221, 138 Am. St. Rep. 861 , 19 Ann. … Gill v. Haynes 28 Okla. 656 , 115 Pac. 790 .

In Re St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co.

141 Okla. 300 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 10, 1929

Louis-San Francisco Railway Company, a corporation, against illegal and excessive tax levies for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 1929, by the county excise board of Tulsa county. Protestee appeals. … We discussed this identical question in cause No. 20142, Coggeshall & Co. v. Smiley, 142 Okla. 8 , 285 Pac. 48 , and there held the levy excessive and illegal.

Myers v. Luttrell

373 P.2d 22 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 17, 1961

Brown, Brown & Brown, McAlester, for defendant in error. *23 PER CURIAM. This is an appeal by C.G. Myers (defendant below) from a judgment on jury verdict in favor of S.B. … In Munroe v.

City of Tulsa v. Langley

196 Okla. 680 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 16, 1946

Board of Commissioners of Tulsa County v. Summers, 181 Okla. 312 , 73 P. 2d 409 ; O’Neil Engineering Co. v. Town of Ryan, 32 Okla. 738 , 124 P. 19 ; Herd Equipment Co. v. … Town of Eagle, 180 Okla. 172 , 68 P. 2d 420 ; Board of Education of Town of Terral v. Challey, 153 Okla. 273 , 5 P. 2d 747 ; Faught v. City of Sapulpa, 145 Okla. 164 , 292 P. 15 ; Town of Red Fork v.

In Re State Funding Bonds of 1935, Series A

173 Okla. 622 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 27, 1935

City of Sulphur v. State, 62 Okla. 312 , 162 P. 744 ; Hamilton Twp. of Okmulgee County v. Underwood, 81 Okla. 256 , 198 P. 300 ; Excise Board of Creek County v. Gulf Pipe Line Co., 156 Okla. 103 , 9 P. (2d) 460 . … Menefee v. Askew, 25 Okla. 623 , 107 P. 159 ; Blakeney v. Lafayette, Chairman Board of Public Affairs, 95 Okla. 282 , 219 P. 292 ; Edwards v. Childers, State Auditor, 102 Okla. 158 , 228 P. 472 ; Bice v. State ex rel.

Akard v. Miller

169 Okla. 584 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 27, 1934

In the case of Hartsog v. … In the absence of the resale deed from the record, and in view of the cases of Treese v. Ferguson, 120 Okla. 235 , 251 P. 91 , and Michie v. Haas, 134 Okla. 57 , 272 P. 883 , we hold the deed is not void on its face.

Adams v. Professional Practices Commission

524 P.2d 932 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 9, 1974

See State v. Freeman, 370 P.2d 307, 312 (Okl.1962). … Boydston v. State, 277 P.2d 138, 139 (Okl.1954). California Employment Commission v. Kovacevich, 27 Cal.2d 546 , 165 P.2d 917, 921 (1946).

City Nat. Bank of Fort Smith v. Incorporated Town of Kiowa

104 Okla. 161 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 14, 1924

Co. v. Board of Education, 83 Okla. 12 , 200 Pac. 171 , the property involved had been abandoned as unsuitable for school purposes long before the action complained of was taken. Nitsche v. … In Mitchell et al. v.

City of Ada v. Spencer

121 Okla. 217 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 15, 1926

Greening, who was general liqui-r dating agent for said banking board, wherein and whereby it was agreed by and between said banking board and said Greening that said Greening should act for said board in reducing to cash … Freeling et al. v.

In Re School District No. 62

180 Okla. 297 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 15, 1937

Board of Commissioners of Lincoln County, 9 S. D. 291, 68 N. W. 746 ; Appeal of Common School Districts Nos. 16, 45, and 94, Dakota County, 158 Minn. 317 , 197 N. W. 742 ; Consolidated School District No. 2 v. … See Sorknes v. Board of County Commissioners (Minn.) 154 N. W. 669 .

Lawless v. Raddis

36 Okla. 616 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jan 7, 1913

In Prescott v. … Bank v. Moore, 30 Okla. 148 , 120 Pac. 1003 ; Grimes v. Wilson, 30 Okla. 322 , 120 Pac. 294 ; Prescott v. Brown, supra; Allen v. Kenyon, 30 Okla. 536 , 119 Pac. 960 ; Edwards v.

SPENCER v. WYRICK

2017 OK 19 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 7, 2017

effect, subject to the power of the Legislature to change or abolish said Courts, Boards, Agencies, or Commissions. … BOARD OF REGENTS v. McCLOSKEY BROTHERS, INC. Discussed 2011 OK 10, 257 P.3d 984, FENT v. HENRY Discussed 2011 OK 57, 270 P.3d 113, TULSA INDUSTRIAL AUTHORITY v.

Kolp v. Parsons

50 Okla. 372 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 27, 1915

Laws 1910, section 5126; Brown v. Massey, 19 Okla. 482 , 92 Pac. 246 . … Weisbender v. School Dist. No. 6, Caddo County, 24 Okla. 173 , 103 Pac. 639 ; Humphrey v. Hunt, 9 Okla. 196 , 59 Pac. 971 .

Herndon v. Anderson

165 Okla. 104 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 26, 1933

Board of County Commissioners of Greer County v. Watson, 7 Okla. 174 , 54 P. 441 . It cannot impose taxes; that power is derived from the state. See Amos v. Mathews (Fla.) 126 So. 308 . … See, also, Borrowdale v. Board of County Commissioners of Socorro County (N. M.) 163 P. 721 . This provision finds support in the case of Steiner v. Sullivan, supra.

Baldwin v. Mason

3 Okla. 237 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 27, 1895

Upon a similar state of facts this court has passed heretofore, in the case of Twine v. Carey, 2 Okla. Rep. 249 , to which ruling the court now adheres. … The ruling heretofore made, in the case of Twine v.

R. J. Edwards, Inc. v. Hert

504 P.2d 407 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 28, 1972

Dabney v. … Reardon, 231 Mo.App. 666 , 104 S.W.2d 407 (1937); Darby v. Mississippi State Board of Bar Admissions, 185 So.2d 684 (Miss.1966); compare Niklaus v. Abel Constr. Co., 164 Neb. 842 , 83 N.W.2d 904 (1957).

City of Collinsville v. Ward

64 Okla. 30 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 13, 1917

Lackey v. State. 29 Okla. 255 , 116 Pac. 913 ; State v. Linn, 49 Okla. 526 , 153 Pac. 826 . Following the rule announced in Kansas City v. … Cr. 662 , 112 Pac. 951 ; State v. Linn, supra. In Lackey v.

In re the Oklahoma Development Finance Authority for Approval of Oklahoma State System of Higher Education Master Real Property Lease Revenue Refunding Bonds

312 P.3d 926 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 24, 2013

Kerr v. … Supp.2012 § 954 provides: A. - The Board of Medicolegal Investigations is authorized to accept grants, gifts, fees or funds from , persons, associations, corporations, or foundations for any purpose authorized by the Board