Opinion

In Re St. Louis-S. F. Ry. Co.

  • 141 Okla. 300
  • 285 P. 13
Court
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Filed
Dec 10, 1929
Status
Published
Author
Andrews
On the bench
Andrews, Mason, Lester, Hunt, Riley, Hefner, Cullison, Clark, Swindall
Cited by
8 cases
Authority
More cited than 76.7%

The opinion

ANDREWS, J.

This is an appeal from an order of the Court of Tax Review sustaining the protest of the St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Company, a corporation, against illegal and excessive tax levies for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 1929, by the county excise board of Tulsa county. Protestee appeals.

The ground of the protest was that the levy made for sinking fund purposes for the city of Tulsa included an amount which the city contends is necessary to pay interest accruals for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 1929.

The Court of Tax Review held that this levy was illegal to the extent of the interest accruals for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 1929.

We discussed this identical question in cause No. 20142, Coggeshall & Co. v. Smiley, 142 Okla. 8 , 285 Pac. 48 , and there held the levy excessive and illegal. We there said:

“An excise board is without authority of law to make an appropriation for the payment of interest on outstanding bonded indebtedness which matures subsequent to the fiscal year for which the appropriation is made.”

We announce the same ruling here.

The judgment of the Court of Tax Review is affirmed.

MASON, C. J., LESTER, Y. C. J., and HUNT, RILEY, HEFNER, and CULLISON, JJ., concur. CLARK and SWINDALL, JJ., absent.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.