Case law

Kelly v. Lopeman

680 F. Supp. 1101 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jul 27, 1987

. # 3) shortly after the filing of their Complaint and prior to receiving the Board of Review’s decision awarding Kelly benefits. The Supreme Court in Sosna v. … Decisions of the Board of Review are appealable to the Common Pleas Courts. Ohio Rev.Code § 4141.28(0).

Benjamin v. Schuller

400 F. Supp. 2d 1055 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Dec 1, 2005

Woodbury v. … Bell v.

Kilburn v. Warren County Jail

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jun 28, 2022

A suit against the Warren County Board of Commissioners in their official capacities is treated as a suit against Warren County, the entity of which the Board of Commissioners is an agent. See Hoskins v. … Ohio Aug. 12, 2019), Report and Recommendation (citing Monell, 436 U.S. at 690); Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989); Smith v. Grady, 960 F. Supp. 2d 735, 740 (S.D.

Parents Defending Education v. Olentangy Local School District Board of Education, et al.

District Court, S.D. Ohio · May 15, 2026

United States v. Lexington-Fayette Urban Cnty. Gov’t, 591 F.3d 484, 489 (6th Cir. 2010) (citations omitted); see Bureau of Consumer Fin. Prot. v. Fifth Third Bank, N.A., 2024 WL 3451080, at *1 (S.D. … See Kukla v. Nat’l Distillers Prods.

Turner v. South-Western City School District

82 F. Supp. 2d 757 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Dec 22, 1999

In Goss v. … See Stuble v. Board of Educ. of the Cuyahoga Valley Joint Vocational Sch. Dist., No. 44412, 1982 WL 5953 at *5 (Ohio Ct.App.

Swigart v. Fifth Third Bank

870 F. Supp. 2d 500 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · May 7, 2012

(Doc. 126, Ex. 13 at 28, 44-45; Ex. 1-Mayer Brown Memo). … V. ANALYSIS A.

Buhrman v. Wilkinson

257 F. Supp. 2d 1110 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 31, 2003

See Hafer v. … See Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972); Woodard v.

Cannonball Transp. Co. v. American Stages, Inc.

53 F.2d 1051 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Nov 16, 1931

Likewise; the order of an administrative board or officer, the obedience ,o£ which will infringe upon or burden interstate commerce, is unconstitutional. Magnuson v. Kelly (D. C.) 35 F.(2d) 867 . … Co. v. Public Utilities Commission, 116 Ohio St. 89 , 155 N. E. 694 ; Estabrook, Receiver, v. Public Utilities, 112 Ohio St. 417 , 147 N. E. 761 ; Westhoven et al. v.

Ohio v. United States Department of Energy

689 F. Supp. 760 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 18, 1988

State Water Resources Control Board, 426 U.S. 200 , 96 S.Ct. 2022 , 48 L.Ed.2d 578 (1976). … The court in McClellan Ecological Seepage Situation v.

CentralSquare Technologies, LLC v. The National Board of Boiler and Pressure Vessel Inspectors

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 17, 2026

Marbley v. … : : Magistrate Judge Kimberly Jolson THE NATIONAL BOARD OF BOILER : AND PRESSURE

Burress v. Spring Grove Cemetery & Arboretum

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jun 5, 2020

Brown v. VHS of Mich., Inc., 545 F. App’x 368, 372 (6th Cir. 2013) (collecting cases). … Hopkins County School Board of Education, 484 F.3d 357, 364 (6th Cir. 2007) (abrogated on other grounds by Lewis v.

Hall v. Chambers Smith

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Feb 1, 2023

Member Jim Bedra; and John Does, unknown Parole Members, Board Members, or other officials. … See Browning v. Pendleton, 869 F.2d 989, 992 (6th Cir. 1989) (citing Ohio Rev. Code § 2305.10). A claim under Section 1983 accrues when the plaintiff knows or should know of the injury that gives rise to it. Cooey v.

State v. U.S. Dep't of Educ.

377 F. Supp. 3d 823 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 26, 2019

(Mot. to Enforce at 50) (citing Board of Trustees Sabis Intern School v. Montgomery , 205 F.Supp.2d 835 , 845-846 (S.D. … Mich. 2014) ; Questar Capital Corp. v. Gorter , 909 F.Supp.2d 789 (W.D. Ky. 2012) ; Brown v. Plata , 563 U.S. 493 , 131 S.Ct. 1910 , 179 L.Ed.2d 969 (2011) ). Finally, Mr.

Draper v. Columbus Public Schools

760 F. Supp. 131 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 21, 1991

The Drapers then appealed this decision to the Columbus City School Board of Education. November 12, 1987, an appeal was heard by Appellate Hearing Officer Ellen Wristen on behalf of the Columbus City School Board. … This report was affirmed by a unanimous vote of the Columbus City School Board on December 1, 1987. Notice of the School Board’s final decision was posted to Mr. Brooks on December 3, 1987.

In Re Huntington Bancshares Inc. ERISA Litigation

620 F. Supp. 2d 842 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Feb 9, 2009

Huntington’s Board of Directors (“Board”) is named as a Defendant in this action. … The Pension Committee is responsible for providing recommendations to the Board in connection with actions taken by the Board in fulfillment of the duties and responsibilities delegated to Huntington and/or the Board pursuant

American Broadcasting Co., Inc. v. Blackwell

479 F. Supp. 2d 719 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Sep 26, 2006

Defendant controls the election process via the boards of election through the issuance of rules, directives and advisories, as well as his authority to appoint the board members. … In turn, the board members appoint and exercise control over local election officials. Board members are also empowered to investigate violations of election laws and to refer them to the local prosecuting attorney.

Ohio Ex Rel. Skaggs v. Brunner

588 F. Supp. 2d 819 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Nov 17, 2008

Caterpillar Inc. v. … Long v.

Render v. Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility

889 F. Supp. 2d 1014 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Aug 22, 2012

Jones v. Thomas, 491 U.S. 376, 381 , 109 S.Ct. 2522 , 105 L.Ed.2d 322 (1989); see also Ohio v. Johnson, 467 U.S. 493, 499 , 104 S.Ct. 2536 , 81 L.Ed.2d 425 (1984); Brown v. … See Brown, 895 N.E.2d at 150 .

Benick v. Morrow County Health District

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jun 8, 2020

Twombly, 550 U.S. at 555; see also Brown v. Matauszak, 415 F. App’x 608, 613 (6th Cir. 2011) (noting that a plaintiff must give specific, well-pleaded facts, not just conclusory allegations). … Erickson v. Pardus, 551 U.S. 89, 94 (2007) (per curiam). But even as a pro se litigant, he still must satisfy basic pleading requirements. Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989).

Podlesnick v. Airborne Express, Inc.

550 F. Supp. 906 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Sep 9, 1982

Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c); Board of Education v. Pico, -U.S.-,-, 102 S.Ct. 2799, 2806 , 73 L.Ed.2d 435 (1982); Atlas Concrete Pipe, Inc. v. Au & Son, Inc,, 668 F.2d 905, 908 (6th Cir.1982). … Ruby v.