Case law

Rice v. The Village of Johnstown

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Oct 25, 2022

Co. v. … Const. amend XIV, § 1; see also Board of Regents v.

Smith-Marker v. Astrue

839 F. Supp. 2d 974 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jan 30, 2012

Richardson v. Perales, 402 U.S. 389, 401 , 91 S.Ct. 1420 , 28 L.Ed.2d 842 (1971)(citing Consolidated Edison Company v. NLRB, 305 U.S. 197, 229 , 59 S.Ct. 206 , 83 L.Ed. 126 (1938)); Landsaw v. … Accord Wilson v. Comm’r of Soc.

Dixon

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 3, 2026

(ECF No. 17 at 11 (quoting Booker v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Co., 879 F.2d 1304, 1312 (6th Cir. 1989) (internal quotation marks omitted)). … Edgar v.

Sarr v. Warden, Southeastern Correctional Institution

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Oct 26, 2020

Ct. 770, 785 (2011); Brown v. Payton, 544 U.S. 133, 140 (2005); Bell v. Cone, 535 U.S. 685, 693- 94 (2002); Williams (Terry) v. Taylor, 529 U.S. 362, 379 (2000). … Brown v. Konteh, 567 F.3d 191, 205 (6th Cir. 2009). In a sufficiency of the evidence habeas corpus case, deference should be given to the trier-of-fact's verdict under Jackson v.

Planned Parenthood of Greater Ohio v. Hodges

201 F. Supp. 3d 898 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Aug 12, 2016

Pa. v. … Plaintiffs also poinj out that Defendant has identified the Cuyahoga County Board of Health and Belmont County General Health as eligible providers under Section 3701.034, yet those two entities also receive Title X funds

Fisher v. City of Chillicothe

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Feb 19, 2025

Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). … Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989) (requiring pro se plaintiffs to satisfy “basic pleading essentials”). But the more lenient standard has limits. Frengler v. Gen. Motors, 482 F.

Scott v. Warden, Chillicothe Correctional Institution

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Nov 18, 2019

673 (6th Cir. 2016), holds a new judgment, at least if it imposes a worse than before sentence by imposing post-release control in lieu of parole, resets the statute of limitations clock. 838 F.3d at 677, followed in Brown … v.

Shine-Johnson v. Gray

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jun 5, 2020

Twombly, 550 U.S. at 555; see also Brown v. Matauszak, 415 F. App’x 608, 613 (6th Cir. 2011) (noting that a plaintiff must give specific, well-pleaded facts, not just conclusory allegations). … See Palmer v. Schuette, 768 F. App’x 422, 426–27 (6th Cir. 2019) (citing Scott v.

Books a Million, Inc. v. H & N ENTERPRISES, INC.

140 F. Supp. 2d 846 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 16, 2001

See also Boretti v. … Co., Inc. v.

Whittington v. National Seating & Mobility, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Feb 14, 2025

Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). … Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989) (requiring pro se plaintiffs to satisfy “basic pleading essentials”). But the more lenient standard has limits. Frengler v. Gen. Motors, 482 F.

Krouskoupf v. Muskingum County Jail

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Sep 12, 2019

See Hill v. … (quoting Brown v. Bargery, 207 F.3d 863, 867 (6th Cir. 2000) (internal quotation marks and citations omitted)).

Moore v. Garner

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Dec 23, 2019

Frengler v. Gen. Motors, 482 F. App’x 975, 976–77 (6th Cir. 2012) (quoting Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989)). … See, e.g., Pfahler v. Natl Latex Prod.

Morris v. Mary Rutan Hospital

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Oct 7, 2020

Nov. 17, 2009) (finding that a plaintiff’s contention that layoffs should have been based on seniority and experience insufficient to support a prima facie case of discrimination); Browning v. … to the age-discrimination inquiry-what matters is Courtney’s perception of Browning’s qualifications.”).

K.F. v. Choice Hotels International, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 25, 2024

Disparte v. Corporate Executive Board, 223 F.R.D. 7, 11 (D.D.C. 2004). … where its own negligence is a cause of the harassment” because it “knew or should have known about the conduct and failed to stop it”); Brown v. Corr. Corp. of Am., 603 F.

Finnell v. Warden, Lebanon Correctional Institution

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Nov 18, 2024

Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); Alspugh v. Mcconnell, 643 F.3d 162, 166 (6th Cir. 2011); Cowherd v. Million, 380 F.3d 909, 912 (6th Cir. 2004); Mattox v. … Tying habeas relief to the loss of jurisdiction was abandoned by the Supreme Court in Brown v.

Total Quality Logistics, LLC v. Alliance Shippers, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Sep 28, 2020

Brown Co. of Waverly, LLC v. Superior Roll Forming, Inc., No. 1:09-CV-802, 2009 WL 4251093, at *3 (W.D. Mich. Nov. 25, 2009). … Hanning v. New England Mut. Life Ins. Co., 710 F.Supp. 213, 214 (S.D. Ohio 1989) (citing Nicol v. Koscinski, 188 F.2d 537 (6th Cir. 1951)).

Breeden v. Frank Brunckhorst Co LLC

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Apr 21, 2020

Harris v. Forklift Sys., Inc., 510 U.S. 17, 23 (1993). “‘[O]ffhand comments’” and “‘isolated incidents’” do not suffice. Barrett v. Whirlpool Corp., 556 F.3d 502, 515 (6th Cir. 2009) (quoting Faragher v. … Brown v. Bunge Corp., 207 F.3d 776, 782 (5th Cir. 2000). Looking at these factors as applied to Ms.

Puskas v. Delaware County, Ohio

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Aug 10, 2021

Plaintiff generally argues that during the deposition of Defendant Buttler on April 22, 2021, she learned new information about Defendant Buttler’s role on a review board and about Defendants Gibson, Spring, and Swick’s … (quoting Lavado v. Keohane, 992 F.2d 601, 604 (6th Cir. 1993)).

G. M. v. Choice Hotels International, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 25, 2024

Disparte v. Corporate Executive Board, 223 F.R.D. 7, 11 (D.D.C. 2004). … where its own negligence is a cause of the harassment” because it “knew or should have known about the conduct and failed to stop it”); Brown v. Corr. Corp. of Am., 603 F. Supp. 2d 73, 81 (D.D.C.

Gonidakis v. Ohio Redistricting Commission

District Court, S.D. Ohio · May 12, 2022

Voinovich v. … Yet the Supreme Court has expressly rejected an across-the-board assumption.