Case law

Honzu v. Warden Ross Correctional Institution

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jul 29, 2022

Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989). … Brown v. McCullick, No. 18-2226, 2019 WL 5436159, at *4 (6th Cir. Apr. 23, 2019) (quoting Jackson v. Hamlin, 61 F. App’x 131, 132 (6th Cir. 2003)); see also Johnson v.

Bishop v. Reagan-Bush '84 Committee

635 F. Supp. 1020 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 7, 1986

Grayned v. City of Rockford, 408 U.S. 104 [ 92 S.Ct. 2294 , 33 L.Ed.2d 222 ] (1972); Adderley v. Florida, supra; Kovacs v. Cooper, 336 U.S. 77 [ 69 S.Ct. 448 , 93 L.Ed. 513 ] (1949); Cox v. … Another court upheld the ejection of a citizen from a gathering at which all members of a school board were in attendance and issues of public policy were discussed. Nabhani v.

Superior Credit Union, Inc. v. CUMIS Insurance Society Inc

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Oct 28, 2019

Each Board member independently confirmed in their interview that they had no knowledge of a potential loss insured by the Bond until a Board Meeting on or about February 3, 2017, at which facts relating to a potential … LLC v.

Warner v. Global Natural Resources PLC

545 F. Supp. 1298 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Sep 3, 1982

Id. at 377 , citing Parrish v. Board of Commissioners of Alabama State Bar, 524 F.2d 98, 103-04 (5th Cir. 1975). There was no allegation of personal bias made in that case. … Southerland v. Irons, 628 F.2d 978, 980 (6th Cir. 1980).

Estate of Owensby v. City of Cincinnati

385 F. Supp. 2d 626 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · May 20, 2004

See, e.g., Lolli v. County of Orange, 351 F.3d 410, 418-419 (9th Cir.2003)(utilizing “deliberate indifference standard”); Brown v. … English, 23 F.3d at 1090 ; see also Brown v. Crowley, 312 F.3d 782, 787-88 (6th Cir.2002).

Escue v. Sequent, Inc.

869 F. Supp. 2d 839 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Apr 25, 2012

He alleges that he first learned about the criminal investigation at a September 24, 2007 Sequent board meeting. … At a Sequent board meeting, Escue purportedly informed the board that he had executed a sub-lease with Optimal Reading Services Group, Inc. (“Optimal”), which itself was leasing the space from the City of Home-wood.

Seifu v. Postmaster General, US Postal Service

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Apr 30, 2020

Smith v. Tipton County Board of Education, 916 F.3d 548, 552 (6th Cir. 2019); see also Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 555, 127 S. Ct. 1955 (2007) (internal citations omitted). … Plaintiff’s color is Brown. Plaintiff's national origins are: Dominican Republic and Ethiopia. Plaintiffs Sex is Female.” (Doc. 1 at ¶¶ 18-21).

Jordan v. Pinkett-Smith

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 23, 2023

Frengler v. Gen. Motors, 482 F. App’x 975, 976–77 (6th Cir. 2012) (quoting Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989)). B. … Brown v. Foley, No. 20-3272, 2020 WL 8921407, at *2 (6th Cir. July 27, 2020) (citing Feathers v. Chevron U.S.A., 141 F.3d 264, 269 (6th Cir. 1998)).

Brooks v. Ohio

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Oct 12, 2022

In the Complaint, Brooks seeks to hold the defendants liable, apparently under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and/or Title II of the ADA, for an August 31, 2020, parole board hearing in which that board denied him parole. … See Thomas v.

Hall v. Chambers Smith

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jul 23, 2024

His next scheduled hearing before the Parole Board is 7/2024.” (Memorandum, Doc. #61-1, PageID 390.) These statements are apparently based on Ms. … See Browning v. Pendleton, 869 F.2d 989, 991 (6th Cir. 1989). Plaintiff did not file his Complaint in this case until March 15, 2021. (Doc.

Citizens Organized to Defend the Environment, Inc. v. Volpe

353 F. Supp. 520 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Dec 15, 1972

Access may be allowed only at highway intersections designated by the director of highways, board of county commissioners, or municipal authorities on roads within their jurisdiction, so as to eliminate cross traffic of vehicles … Joseph Brown. Sustained as to paragraphs 1-5. Rex O. Leathers. Overruled as to paragraphs 1-8 of affidavit #9; ' and overruled as to paragraphs 1-6 of affidavit #14.

Allah v. Kinker

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Apr 9, 2020

Frengler v. Gen. Motors, 482 F. App’x 975, 976–77 (6th Cir. 2012) (quoting Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989)). … Lewis, 518 U.S. at 353; see also Brown v. Matauszak, 415 F.

Jordan v. Bush

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Apr 24, 2023

Frengler v. Gen. Motors, 482 F. App’x 975, 976–77 (6th Cir. 2012) (quoting Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989)). B. … Brown v. Foley, No. 20-3272, 2020 WL 8921407, at *2 (6th Cir. July 27, 2020) (citing Feathers v. Chevron U.S.A., 141 F.3d 264, 269 (6th Cir. 1998)).

Lovell v. Clermont County Sheriff's Office

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Dec 21, 2023

.”); Petty v. … So Lovelo must sue the board, not the County itself. Likewise, under Ohio law, a Sheriff’s Office or Department is not subject to suit as a separate legal entity. Smith v.

Justice v. State of Ohio

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Oct 18, 2021

Southland Corp., 875 F.2d 1246, 1251 (6th Cir. 1989); Browning v. Foltz, 837 F.2d 276, 279 (6th Cir. 1988). Review is for abuse of discretion. Wheeler, 875 F.2d at 1251. … United States v. Grinnell Corp., 384 U.S. 563, 583 (1966); see also Youn v. Track, Inc., 324 F.3d 409, 423 (6th Cir. 2003), citing Grinnell, supra; Bradley v.

Preston v. Sullivan

785 F. Supp. 1267 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Feb 26, 1992

Richardson v. Perales, 402 U.S. 389, 401 , 91 S.Ct. 1420, 1427 , 28 L.Ed.2d 842 (1971); LeMaster v. Weinberger, 533 F.2d 337, 339 (6th Cir.1976). … See Bradford v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 803 F.2d 871, 874 (6th Cir.1986); Brown v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 801 F.2d 361, 363 (10th Cir.1986).

Millhouse

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Feb 2, 2026

Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989). … See Brown v. Mahlman, No. 1:22-cv-239, 2022 WL 17817615, at *3 (S.D. Ohio Dec. 19, 2022) (dismissing alleged violations of ODRC policy because they “fall outside the scope of § 1983”).

Anderson v. Benedict

1 F. Supp. 654 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jul 22, 1932

In the case of Brown v. Tillinghast, 93 F. 326 (C. C. … Tillinghast v. Bailey [C. C.] 86 F. 46 ; Rand v. [Columbia Nat.] Bank [C. C.] 87 F. 520 .” To the same effect, Columbia National Bank v. Mathews (C. C. A.) 85 F. 934 ; Casey v. Galli, 94 U. S. 673 , 24 L.

In re Wulzen

235 F. 362 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Aug 25, 1916

In Boske v. Comingore, 177 U. S. .459, 20 Sup. Ct. 701, 44 L. … Co. v. Knapp, 233 Fed. 950 , — C. C. A. —; Waters v. Guile, 234 Fed. 532 , — C. C. A. —.

Maas v. JTM Provisions Company Inc.

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 13, 2025

JTM is equally owned and controlled by Tony, Jack, Jerry, and Joe, who each hold 25% of JTM’s outstanding shares of common stock, and who, as this Court understands, all sit on JTM’s Board of Directors (the “Board”). … On February 9, 2017, after numerous objections from Joe and complaints from other independent Board members, the Board passed a corporate resolution limiting JTM’s annual tithing contributions to a maximum of 2% of its