Case law

Hamrick v. UNION TP., OHIO

79 F. Supp. 2d 871 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Dec 22, 1999

Co. v. Valeron Corp., 608 F.2d 265, 268 (6th Cir.1979); Melamed v. ITT Continental Baking Co., 592 F.2d 290 , 293 (6th Cir.1979). … Brown Sprinkler Service Inc., 85 Ohio App.3d 485, 488 , 620 N.E.2d 134, 136 (1993). In Ohio, the Disciplinary Rules recite the ethical obligations of an attorney toward his or her client.

Ob'saint v. Warden, Toledo Correctional Inst.

675 F. Supp. 2d 827 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Dec 21, 2009

In State v. … Brown v. Konteh, 567 F.3d 191 (6th Cir. 2009), cited by petitioner in his reply brief (Doc. 19 at 4), is factually distinguishable from the instant case.

Hartzler v. Licking County Humane Society

740 F. Supp. 470 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jun 29, 1990

Bremer became a member of the Board of Directors of the Society. … In Gallick v.

Albert v. Honda Development & Manufacturing of America, LLC

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 29, 2025

v. Magistrate Judge Kimberly A. … The three other above-captioned actions—Tripoli v. Honda Dev. & Mfg. of Am., LLC, 2:22-cv-03828, Whatley v. Honda Dev. & Mfg. of Am., LLC; 2:22-cv-04372, and Scarbrough v.

Bush v. O'Reilly Automotive Stores, Inc.

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Dec 9, 2022

Corp. v. Stewart Info. Servs. … Similarly, in Eaves, Ohio’s savings statute did not apply where “Plaintiff’s state complaint named the ‘Brown County Commissioners;’ ‘Brown County Clerk of Courts;’ and ‘Brown County Sheriff’s Office,’” but did “not name

Shields

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jun 29, 2026

Co., 307 F.3d 501, 517 (6th Cir. 2002), or conduct “tantamount to bad faith,” Roadway Express, Inc. v. Piper, 447 U.S. 752, 767 (1980). Bad faith includes refusal to comply with a court order. Brown v. … See Mitan v. Int’l Fidelity Ins. Co., 23 F.

Cokes v. Stanson

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jan 31, 2025

Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989). … See Frengler v. Gen. Motors, 482 F. App’x 975, 976–77 (6th Cir. 2012) (quoting Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989)) (“‘courts should not have to guess at the nature of the claim asserted.’”).

Cooper v. Western & Southern Financial Group, Inc.

847 F. Supp. 2d 1031 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 14, 2012

Prot. & Advocacy Serv., Inc. v. Babin, 18 F.3d 337 , 347 (6th Cir. *1035 1994); Farmer v. City of Cincinnati, No. 1:04-cv-080, 2006 WL 2814398 , at *8 (S.D.Ohio Sept. 28, 2006) (Dlott, J.); Sunrise Dev., Inc. v. … See Eaton v. Newport Bd. of Educ., 975 F.2d 292, 298 (6th Cir.1992) (citing California Motor Transp. Co. v. Trucking Unlimited, 404 U.S. 508 , 92 S.Ct. 609 , 30 L.Ed.2d 642 (1972); United Mine Workers of Am. v.

Scovill v. WSYX/ABC, Sinclair Broadcast Group, Inc.

312 F. Supp. 2d 955 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 29, 2004

In support of his position, Plaintiff relies on Hammaker v. Brown & Brown, Inc., 214 F.Supp.2d 575 (E.D.Va.2002). In that case, Plaintiff commenced an action for discrimination under the ADEA and sought a jury trial. … See Brown v. Renter’s Choice, 55 F.Supp.2d 788, 791 (N.D.Ohio 1999). 12 .Congress enacted the statute as an amendment to the ADEA to ensure that workers would not carelessly waive a potential ADEA *MXVII claim.

Luxottica of America Inc. v. Allianz Global Risks US Insurance Company

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Feb 25, 2021

(quoting Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. F.T.C., 710 F.2d 1165, 1179 (6th Cir. 1983)). … (quoting Brown & Williamson, 710 F.2d at 1176).

Williams v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp.

15 F. Supp. 3d 761 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Apr 21, 2014

In McDarby v. … As the court held in Brown v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp., No. 7:08-cv-130, 2012 WL 3066588 , at *8 (E.D.N.C.

Doe v. Finneytown Local School District

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Oct 7, 2019

Defendant is the FLSD Board of Education.3 (Id. at ¶ 2). … § 2744.01(F); Estate of Olsen v. Fairfield City Sch. Dist. Bd. of Educ., 341 F. Supp. 3d 793, 809 (S.D. Ohio 2018) (concluding that a board of education was a political subdivision). state law claims); Hart v.

Elliott v. Warden, Southern Ohio Correctional Facility

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Dec 4, 2024

Whether the Court reads the Petition as directed at the underlying conviction or the results of the post-conviction Rules Infraction Board and Parole Board proceedings, Respondent asserts the petition is barred by the statute … Duncan v. Walker, 533 U.S. 167 (2001). Conclusion On the basis of the foregoing analysis, the Magistrate Judge respectfully recommends the Petition be dismissed with prejudice.

Pullins v. Conagra Brands, Inc

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 16, 2020

Shane Grp. v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Mich., 825 F.3d 299, 306 (6th Cir. 2016); see also Rudd Equip. Co., Inc. v. John Deere Constr. & Forestry Co., 834 F.3d 589, 593–94 (6th Cir. 2016). … Ultimately, courts possess discretion to seal records, Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v.

Amicus Miami of Ohio, LLC v. Kacachos

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Oct 27, 2022

Shane Group., Inc. v. Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan, 825 F.3d 299, 305 (6th Cir. 2016) (citing In re Knoxville News- Sentinel Co., 723 F.2d 470, 476 (6th Cir. 1983)). … Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. F.T.C., 710 F.2d 1165, 1180 (6th Cir. 1983).

Meehan v. Nelsonville Mobile Home Sales

387 F. Supp. 1395 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jan 20, 1975

Board of Trade v. Johnson, 264 U.S. 1, 11-12 , 44 S.Ct. 232 , 68 L.Ed. 533 (1924). 2 Collier on Bankruptcy ¶ 23.04, pp. 452-461 (14th ed. 1973). 2. The bankruptcy court has constructive possession of the property. … See, e. g., Gill v.

Smith v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad

144 F. Supp. 869 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Oct 3, 1956

The plaintiff, Charles V. Smith, is a resident of Hamilton County, Ohio, and is a citizen of the State of Ohio. 2. … The National Railroad Adjustment Board is therefore without jurisdiction and plaintiff and others similarly situated are without an adequate administrative remedy.

Lockhart

District Court, S.D. Ohio · May 27, 2026

Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 545 (2007). Pro se complaints are to be construed liberally, but “basic pleading essentials” still are required. Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989). … Reitz v. McKay, 2014 WL 6770139, at *1 (S.D. Ohio Dec. 1, 2014) (citing Howard v. Sec.

McCormick v. Franklin County Court of Common Pleas Domestic Division

District Court, S.D. Ohio · Oct 29, 2019

MARBLEY v. … Court of Common Pleas, Domestic Division; Franklin County Court of Common Pleas, Civil Division; Franklin County Department of Job and Family Services; Franklin County Child Support Enforcement Agency; Susan Brown

Pearson v. Easy Living, Inc.

534 F. Supp. 884 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Jul 14, 1981

Be cause credit transactions defy exhaustive regulation by statute, expansive authority was delegated to the Federal Reserve Board (hereinafter FRB). … First, the Federal Reserve Board obviously intended refinancing to take on the character of the original financing contract or it would have directed what specific section of 12 C.F.R. § 226.8 applied to refinancing.