Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersohsd

2,956 results

0.87s

  • Lambert v. Commissioner of Social Security

    886 F. Supp. 2d 671 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Mar 21, 2012

    Establishing the Existence of a Disability To qualify for disabled widow’s insurance benefits, a claimant must be unmarried; between the ages of fifty and sixty; be the spouse of a wage earner who dies fully insured; file … The Court’s March 6, 2006 Order clearly laid out the errors of the Commissioner’s initial determination, as well as the steps SSA needed to take to comply with its own regulations.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Hawley v. Dresser Industries, Inc.

    737 F. Supp. 445 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · May 15, 1990

    Therefore, the defendants breached no “written employment contract” which established the prima facie employment relationship. … The court in Oldfather noted that Ohio cases have involved bystanders to accidents, without qualifying this observation with a word like "usually.” Id. The court held that Oldfather was not such a case. Id.

    Abrogated on other grounds by David A. Humphreys v. Bellaire Corporation, 966 F.2d 1037 (1992)Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Executone of Columbus, Inc. v. Inter-Tel, Inc.

    665 F. Supp. 2d 899 · District Court, S.D. Ohio · Sep 30, 2009

    In Minger , the district court had concluded that the defendant was being sued only for negligence and was immune because he was performing a discretionary act within the scope of his authority. 239 F.3d. at 798 . … “Once vested, ... a cause of action clearly becomes a substantive right for purposes of Section 28, Article II.” Groch v. General Motors Corporation, 117 Ohio St.3d 192, 225 , 883 N.E.2d 377 (2008) (citing Van Fossen v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Johnson v. Tamborski

    District Court, S.D. Ohio · Oct 29, 2019

    claims and to recommend dismissal of Plaintiffs’ Complaint, or any portion of it, which is frivolous, malicious, fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune … “This is because the competence of a layman is clearly too limited to allow him to risk the rights of others.” Fymbo, 213 F.3d at 1321.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Moore v. Frazier

    District Court, S.D. Ohio · May 31, 2024

    Moore has not met her burden to show deliberate indifference and cannot overcome their defense of qualified immunity. Because Ms. … City of Brunswick, 287 F.3d 492, 497 (6th Cir. 2002) (granting immunity under Ohio Rev.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Christopher F. v. Commissioner of Social Security

    District Court, S.D. Ohio · Sep 4, 2026

    LEGAL FRAMEWORK & STANDARD OF REVIEW Social Security To qualify for disability benefits, a claimant must suffer from a medically determinable … Ohio Dec. 29, 2022) (“the ALJ needed to explain why he determined that [claimant] was limited to superficial contact as [the ALJ] defined it, and it is sufficient that the record not be clearly contrary to that definition

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • In Re: Ohio Execution Protocol Litigation

    District Court, S.D. Ohio · Nov 23, 2020

    Bucklew tells us that earlier modes of executionoffer “instructive” examples, both of what qualifies as too severe (“[b]reaking on the wheel, flaying alive, rending asunder with horses”) and what … Thus, it would be legally impossible for anyone alleging only sensations of drowning or suffocating to establish an Eighth Amendment violation in connection with a method of execution.”

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • In Re: Ohio Execution Protocol Litigation

    District Court, S.D. Ohio · Nov 23, 2020

    Bucklew tells us that earlier modes of executionoffer “instructive” examples, both of what qualifies as too severe (“[b]reaking on the wheel, flaying alive, rending asunder with horses”) and what … Thus, it would be legally impossible for anyone alleging only sensations of drowning or suffocating to establish an Eighth Amendment violation in connection with a method of execution.”

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • In Re: Ohio Execution Protocol Litigation

    District Court, S.D. Ohio · Nov 21, 2020

    Bucklew tells us that earlier modes of execution offer “instructive” examples, both of what qualifies as too severe (“[b]reaking on the wheel, flaying alive, rending asunder with horses”) and what … Thus, it would be legally impossible for anyone alleging only sensations of drowning or suffocating to establish an Eighth Amendment violation in connection with a method of execution.”

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • In Re: Ohio Execution Protocol Litigation

    District Court, S.D. Ohio · Nov 21, 2020

    Bucklew tells us that earlier modes of execution offer “instructive” examples, both of what qualifies as too severe (“[b]reaking on the wheel, flaying alive, rending asunder with horses”) and what … Thus, it would be legally impossible for anyone alleging only sensations of drowning or suffocating to establish an Eighth Amendment violation in connection with a method of execution.”

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • In Re: Ohio Execution Protocol Litigation

    District Court, S.D. Ohio · Nov 21, 2020

    Bucklew tells us that earlier modes of execution offer “instructive” examples, both of what qualifies as too severe (“[b]reaking on the wheel, flaying alive, rending asunder with horses”) and what … Thus, it would be legally impossible for anyone alleging only sensations of drowning or suffocating to establish an Eighth Amendment violation in connection with a method of execution.”

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • In Re: Ohio Execution Protocol Litigation

    District Court, S.D. Ohio · Nov 23, 2020

    Bucklew tells us that earlier modes of execution offer “instructive” examples, both of what qualifies as too severe (“[b]reaking on the wheel, flaying alive, rending asunder with horses”) and what … Thus, it would be legally impossible for anyone alleging only sensations of drowning or suffocating to establish an Eighth Amendment violation in connection with a method of execution.”

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • In Re: Ohio Execution Protocol Litigation

    District Court, S.D. Ohio · Nov 23, 2020

    Bucklew tells us that earlier modes of execution offer “instructive” examples, both of what qualifies as too severe (“[b]reaking on the wheel, flaying alive, rending asunder with horses”) and what … Thus, it would be legally impossible for anyone alleging only sensations of drowning or suffocating to establish an Eighth Amendment violation in connection with a method of execution.”

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • In Re: Ohio Execution Protocol Litigation

    District Court, S.D. Ohio · Nov 23, 2020

    Bucklew tells us that earlier modes of execution offer “instructive” examples, both of what qualifies as too severe (“[b]reaking on the wheel, flaying alive, rending asunder with horses”) and what … Thus, it would be legally impossible for anyone alleging only sensations of drowning or suffocating to establish an Eighth Amendment violation in connection with a method of execution.”

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • In Re: Ohio Execution Protocol Litigation

    District Court, S.D. Ohio · Nov 21, 2020

    Bucklew tells us that earlier modes of execution offer “instructive” examples, both of what qualifies as too severe (“[b]reaking on the wheel, flaying alive, rending asunder with horses”) and what … Thus, it would be legally impossible for anyone alleging only sensations of drowning or suffocating to establish an Eighth Amendment violation in connection with a method of execution.”

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • In Re: Ohio Execution Protocol Litigation

    District Court, S.D. Ohio · Nov 21, 2020

    Bucklew tells us that earlier modes of execution offer “instructive” examples, both of what qualifies as too severe (“[b]reaking on the wheel, flaying alive, rending asunder with horses”) and what … Thus, it would be legally impossible for anyone alleging only sensations of drowning or suffocating to establish an Eighth Amendment violation in connection with a method of execution.”

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • In Re: Ohio Execution Protocol Litigation

    District Court, S.D. Ohio · Nov 21, 2020

    Bucklew tells us that earlier modes of execution offer “instructive” examples, both of what qualifies as too severe (“[b]reaking on the wheel, flaying alive, rending asunder with horses”) and what … Thus, it would be legally impossible for anyone alleging only sensations of drowning or suffocating to establish an Eighth Amendment violation in connection with a method of execution.”

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • In Re: Ohio Execution Protocol Litigation

    District Court, S.D. Ohio · Nov 21, 2020

    Bucklew tells us that earlier modes of execution offer “instructive” examples, both of what qualifies as too severe (“[b]reaking on the wheel, flaying alive, rending asunder with horses”) and what … Thus, it would be legally impossible for anyone alleging only sensations of drowning or suffocating to establish an Eighth Amendment violation in connection with a method of execution.”

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • In Re: Ohio Execution Protocol Litigation

    District Court, S.D. Ohio · Nov 21, 2020

    Bucklew tells us that earlier modes of execution offer “instructive” examples, both of what qualifies as too severe (“[b]reaking on the wheel, flaying alive, rending asunder with horses”) and what … Thus, it would be legally impossible for anyone alleging only sensations of drowning or suffocating to establish an Eighth Amendment violation in connection with a method of execution.”

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • In Re: Ohio Execution Protocol Litigation

    District Court, S.D. Ohio · Nov 21, 2020

    Bucklew tells us that earlier modes of execution offer “instructive” examples, both of what qualifies as too severe (“[b]reaking on the wheel, flaying alive, rending asunder with horses”) and what … Thus, it would be legally impossible for anyone alleging only sensations of drowning or suffocating to establish an Eighth Amendment violation in connection with a method of execution.”

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.