Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersohnd

4,048 results

2.66s

  • Avery v. Commissioner of Social Security

    District Court, N.D. Ohio · May 14, 2020

    , 416.920(a)(4)(i)-(v); Combs v. … [nor is the court] free to accept ‘appellate counsel’s rationalization for agency action in lieu of reasons and findings enunciated by the Board.’”)

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • MSP Recovery Claims, Series LLC v. Grange Insurance Company

    District Court, N.D. Ohio · Dec 12, 2019

    Although neither Ishler and Bellaire directly discuss the doctrines of champerty or maintenance, they each cite to Brown v. … Brown v. Ginn (1902), 66 Ohio St. 316, 64 N.E. 123, paragraph two of the syllabus.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Scott v. Anderson

    58 F. Supp. 2d 767 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Sep 30, 1998

    Scott v. … Brown v. Cain, 1995 WL 495890 at *19 (E.D.La. Aug.18, 1995), affirmed, 104 F.3d 744 (5th Cir. 1997), cert. denied, 520 U.S. 1195 , 117 S.Ct. 1489 , 137 L.Ed.2d 699 (1997).

    Reversed in part, on other grounds by Jay D. Scott, Petitioner-Appellee v. Betty Mitchell, Warden, Respondent-Appellant/ Cross-Appellee, 209 F.3d 854 (2000)Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Gasiorowski-Watts v. CSX Transportation Inc.

    District Court, N.D. Ohio · Sep 25, 2024

    Mangold v. Norfolk S. Ry. Co., No. 21-3059, 2021 WL 5904091, at *3 (6th Cir. Dec. 14, 2021) quoting Consolidated Rail Corp. v. United States Dep’t of Labor, 567 F. App'x 334, 337(6th Cir. 2014) (citing Araujo v. … Lockhart v. Long Island R.R. Co., 266 F. Supp. 3d 659, 663 (S.D.N.Y. 2017), aff'd sub nom. Lockhart v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Arends v. Family Solutions of Ohio, Inc.

    District Court, N.D. Ohio · Mar 2, 2021

    following individuals have supervisory authority with respect to the QMHS position: Julie Winston, Clinical Supervisor; Tameka Huey-Barkley, Program Director; Deborah Williams, Program Director; Ameerah Board … One LLC v. U.S. Bank Nat. Ass'n, 569 Fed. Appx. 438, 441 (6th Cir. 2014) (quoting V & M Star Steel v. Centimark Corp., 678 F.3d 459, 465 (6th Cir. 2012)). See also Gerling & Associates, Inc. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Majors, Jr. v. General Dynamics Land Systems, Inc.

    District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jul 11, 2024

    Ashcroft v. … See Brown v. RCO Engineering Inc., No. 23-11371, 2024 WL 1019258 at *5 (E.D. Mich.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Connolly v. Dunlop

    District Court, N.D. Ohio · Nov 26, 2024

    Brown v. VHS of Mich., Inc., 545 Fed.Appx. 368, 372 (6th Cir. 2013) (citing Hicks v. … See Mitchell v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • O'Neal v. Denn-Ohio, LLC

    District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jan 14, 2020

    Co. v. … Daimler AG v. Bauman, 571 U.S. 117, 137 (2014); Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 924 (2011)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Neal v. Metro Regional Transit Authority

    District Court, N.D. Ohio · Aug 8, 2019

    Barany-Snyder v. … See Kirola v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Marathon Petroleum Company, LP v. Noil Petroleum Corporation

    District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jan 28, 2020

    Rogers v. O’Donnell, 737 F.3d 1026, 1030 (6th Cir. 2013). All evidence must be viewed in the light most favorable to the nonmovant, White v. … (which means ‘free on board’) at a named place … is a delivery term under which…when the term is F.O.B.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Sifuentes

    District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jun 12, 2026

    Taylor v. Sturgell, 553 U.S. 880, 892 (2008) (quoting New Hampshire v. Maine, 532 U.S. 742, 748-49 (2001)). … DeSoto v. Board of Parks & Recreation, 64 F. Supp. 3d 1070, 1101 (M.D. Tenn. 2014). Plaintiff fails to state a claim against Progressive under this statute.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Slaughter v. Lincoln Electric Company

    District Court, N.D. Ohio · Oct 7, 2019

    See also Comer v. … See also Hoffman-LaRoche Inc. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Tromler v. Commissioner of Social Security

    District Court, N.D. Ohio · Nov 18, 2024

    Mullen v. … Bowen v. Comm’r of Soc.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Ramoni v. Cuyahoga Metropolitan Housing Authority

    District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jan 30, 2023

    Ramoni also filed an unfair labor practice charge with the Ohio State Employment Relations Board (the “SERB”), which was also denied. (Doc. No. 34-1, at 225–28; Doc. … Ercegovich v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Majors, Jr. v. General Dynamics Land Systems, Inc.

    District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jul 10, 2024

    Ashcroft v. … See Brown v. RCO Engineering Inc., No. 23-11371, 2024 WL 1019258 at *5 (E.D. Mich.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Lirones v. Leaf Home Water Solutions, LLC

    District Court, N.D. Ohio · Sep 16, 2024

    In the first instance, in Cunningham v. … Kraus v. Board of Cnty. Rd. Comm’rs for Kent Cnty., 364 F.2d 919, 922 (6th Cir. 1966)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Whitnie Jackson v. Cleveland Clinic Foundation, et al.

    District Court, N.D. Ohio · Aug 20, 2026

    Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989). A plaintiff may plead herself out of federal court if the allegations presented demonstrate a bar to relief. Cataldo v. U.S. … In Cleland v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Johnson Automotive Sales, LLC v. Blair

    District Court, N.D. Ohio · Feb 24, 2023

    Kirilenko-Ison v. Board of Educ. of Danville Indep. Schs., 974 F.3d 652, 660 (6th Cir. 2020) (citing Matsushita Elec. Indus. Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574, 587 (1986)). … Street v. J.C. Bradford & Co., 886 F.2d 1472, 1479–80 & n.12 (6th Cir. 1989); Chappell v. City of Cleveland, 584 F. Supp. 2d 974, 988 (N.D. Ohio 2008).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Group v. Robinson

    158 F. Supp. 3d 632 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jan 20, 2016

    Uttecht v. Brown, 551 U.S. 1, 9 , 127 S.Ct. 2218 , 167 L.Ed.2d 1014 (2007). … In State v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Singh

    District Court, N.D. Ohio · Feb 18, 2026

    Mantena v. Johnson, 809 F.3d 721, 728–29 (2d Cir. 2015); Musunuru v. Lynch, 831 F.3d 880, 887–88 (7th Cir. 2016); Kurapati v. U.S. Bur. of Citizenship and Immigr. … Second, because Petitioner’s habeas petition includes, inter alia, a due process claim, the administrative scheme (i.e. appeal to the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”)) is likely futile.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.