Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
4,048 results
0.45s
Geraghty v. Jackson Local School District Board of Education
District Court, N.D. Ohio · Aug 12, 2024
ORDER Before the Court are cross Motions for Summary Judgment filed on February 14, 2024, by Defendants Jackson Local School District Board of Education (“the Board”), Christopher DiLoreto … Plating, Inc. v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownWinnipeg Rugby Football Club, Ltd. v. Freeman
140 F. Supp. 365 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Aug 15, 1955
Pictures, Inc. v. … See McCaull v. Braham, C.C., 16 F. 37, 40 ; Keith v. Kellermann, C.C., 169 F. 196, 200 .
Cited 10 timesPublishedCleveland Communications, Inc. v. Lorain County Board of Commissioners
District Court, N.D. Ohio · Aug 20, 2024
(“CCI”) filed a first amended complaint against Defendants Lorain County Board of Commissioners (the “Board”), Jeffrey Armbruster, David J. Moore, and Jeffrey Riddell (collectively, “Defendants”). (ECF No. 10). … , Moore and Riddell (Count Four); (v) denial of equal protection, in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment, against the Board, Moore, and Riddell (Count Five); and (vi) breach of contract, against the Board (Count Six).
Cited 0 timesUnknownThibert v. CITY OF OREGON, OHIO
724 F. Supp. 2d 830 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jul 15, 2010
See Murphy v. … See Birch v.
Cited 1 timesPublished808 F. Supp. 2d 1028 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Aug 18, 2011
Brown, supra, 520 U.S. at 409, 117 S.Ct. 1382 . … See Brown v. Lincoln Hts., 2011 WL 2852782 , *4 (Ohio App.Ct. July 20, 2011). The contract is lucrative for the county.
Cited 5 timesPublishedTufts v. United States Postal Service
431 F. Supp. 484 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Dec 14, 1976
This cause of action is precluded by the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Brown v. … See, Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577-579 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972); Perry v. Sinderman, 408 U.S. 593, 602-603 , 92 S.Ct. 2694 , 33 L.Ed.2d 570 (1972); Arnett v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedTrolian v. Richland County Mental Health and Recovery Services Board
District Court, N.D. Ohio · Aug 25, 2025
The district court decision in Blair v. Board of Trustees of Sugarcreek Township, et al., 2008 WL 11352586 (S.D. Ohio May 5, 2008) provides the relevant analytical framework. … This principle was clearly stated by the Supreme Court of Ohio in State v. ex rel. Timken Roller Bearing Co. v. Indus.
Cited 0 timesUnknownSummit Locations, LLC v. Board of Trustees, Bath Township, Ohio
District Court, N.D. Ohio · Sep 19, 2025
First, is a Motion to Dismiss in Lieu of Answer to First Amended Complaint filed by Defendants Bath Township Board of Trustees, William Funk, and Nanci Noonan (Doc. 25). … Co., LLC v. Franklin Twp.
Cited 0 timesUnknownKraemer v. Edward Kraemer & Sons, Inc.
783 F. Supp. 1040 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · May 8, 1991
Brown, and David R. … Blettner, a member of the EKS Board of Directors who is not an employee of EKS.
Cited 0 timesPublishedWood v. Summit County Fiscal Office
579 F. Supp. 2d 935 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Sep 29, 2008
Brown. … Brown or appearing at his pretermination hearing. In Buckner v.
Cited 1 timesPublished246 F. Supp. 2d 837 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Feb 24, 2003
Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 569 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). … Lastly, the public dissemination must have been voluntary. *842 Brown v. City of Niota, 214 F.3d 718, 722-23 (6th Cir.2000) (citing Ludwig v. Bd. of Trustees, 123 F.3d 404, 410 (6th Cir.1997)).
Cited 5 timesPublishedGarnett v. Akron City School District Board of Education
District Court, N.D. Ohio · Sep 8, 2022
Street v. J.C. Bradford & Co., 886 F.2d 1472, 1480 (6th Cir.1989). See also InterRoyal Corp. v. … Guarino v. Brookfield Twp. Trustees, 980 F.2d 399, 404 (6th Cir. 1992) III.
Cited 0 timesUnknownGarnett v. Akron City School District Board of Education
District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jan 19, 2023
See Jinks v. AlliedSignal, Inc., 250 F.3d 381, 385 (6th Cir. 2001) (citing Couch v. Travelers Ins. Co., 551 F.2d 958, 959 (5th Cir.1977)). … Co. v. Brunswick Assocs., 507 U.S. 380, 388 (1993)).
Cited 0 timesUnknownSilvaggio v. Ashtabula Area City Schools Board Of Education
District Court, N.D. Ohio · Aug 12, 2022
) ) OPINION & ORDER ASHTABULA AREA CITY SCHOOLS ) BOARD … Court are two motions to partially dismiss the complaint (collectively, the “Motions”), the first by Defendant Shawntel Six (ECF Doc. 9) and the second by Defendants Ashtabula Area City Schools Board
Cited 0 timesUnknownMaras v. Mayfield City School District Board of Education
District Court, N.D. Ohio · Sep 13, 2021
(“The Board”, “Board”, or “Defendants”) duly approved and enacted Policy No. 8450.01 (“The Policy”) (See Def.’s Opp’n to Pls.’ … Abney v. Amgen, Inc., 443 F.3d 540, 552 (6th Cir. 2006); Overstreet v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownMyers v. Boardman Local School District Board of Education
District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jul 11, 2022
No. 9 at 8 (quoting Bellamy v. … No. 11 at 2 (citing Bass v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownWheatley v. Boardman Local Schools District Board of Education
District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jan 23, 2023
See Easley v. Univ. of Mich. … Gonzaga Univ. v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownNagel v. Cloverleaf Local School District Board of Education
District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jan 25, 2023
Federal Insurance Co. v. Webne, 513 F.Supp.2d 921, 924 (N.D. Ohio 2007) (citing Innovative Digital Equip., Inc. v. Quantum Tech., Inc., 597 F.Supp. 983, 989 (N.D. Ohio 1984)). … SKY Technology Partners, LLC v. Midwest Research Institute, 125 F.Supp.2d 286, 298 (S.D. Ohio 2000). Federal courts generally disfavor motions for more definite statements. Federal Insurance Co. v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownMyers v. Boardman Local School District Board of Education
District Court, N.D. Ohio · Nov 28, 2022
Mixon v. Ohio, 193 F.3d 389, 400 (6th Cir. 1999) (citing Morgan v. Church’s Fried Chicken, 829 F.2d 10, 12 (6th Cir. 1987)). … M.T., 2017 WL 2119346, at *3 (citing Arendale v. City of Memphis, 519 F.3d 587, 600 (6th Cir. 2008)). Myers cannot show any such conscious failure by the Board to act.
Cited 0 timesUnknownT.V.S. v. Akron City School District Board of Education
District Court, N.D. Ohio · Oct 13, 2022
(Resolves Doc. 143) Defendants. ) Pending before the Court is a motion for summary judgment filed by Defendants Akron City School District Board … P. 55(c) (“The court may set aside an entry of default for good cause"); see, e.g., Hanming Feng v. Soy Sauce L.L.C., No. 15-CV- 3058 (E.N.V.) (L.B.), 2017 WL 6561160 (E.D.N.Y.
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna