Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersohnd

4,048 results

1.76s

  • Grewal v. Ashcroft

    301 F. Supp. 2d 692 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jan 30, 2004

    Apokarina v. … Tellez v. INS, 91 F.Supp.2d 1356, 1357-58 (C.D.Cal.2000); Mosleh v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Marsilio v. Vigluicci

    924 F. Supp. 2d 837 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Feb 14, 2013

    Board of Education, 391 U.S. 563 , 88 S.Ct. 1731 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811 (1968), to determine if plaintiffs free speech interests outweigh the efficiency interests of her government employer. Scarbrough v. Morgan Cnty. … Board of Educ., 391 U.S. 563 , 88 S.Ct. 1731 , 20 L.Ed.2d 811 (1968). Dambrot v. Central Michigan Univ., 55 F.3d 1177 , 1186 (6th Cir.1995).

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Yoder

    District Court, N.D. Ohio · Aug 4, 2026

    TriHealth, Inc. v. Board of Commissioners, Hamilton County, Ohio, 430 F.3d 783, 788 (6th Cir. 2005) (citation omitted). … In Bertovich v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Danielson v. Fletcher

    132 F.R.D. 489 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Oct 10, 1990

    Wagner v. Taylor, 836 F.2d 578 (D.C.Cir.1987). … Instead of introducing evidence of class-wide discrimination, appellants introduced only evidence of the two Boards’ treatment of them individually____ The district court, faced only with claims of individual discriminatory

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Deadwiley v. State of Ohio

    District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jul 10, 2025

    Beginning with Preiser v. … Browning v. Pendleton, 869 F.2d 989, 992 (6th Cir. 1989) (holding the appropriate statute of limitations for § 1983 civil rights actions arising in Ohio is the two-year limitation contained in Ohio Rev.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Salisbury v. Kroyer Heating & Air Conditioning

    683 F. Supp. 177 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Dec 1, 1986

    See, e.g., Sheriff v. … The Board of Arbitration found that it was without power to decide whether defendant *182 was bound by the current master contract.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Pipe Fitters Local Union No. 120 v. Qwest Mechanical Contractors

    District Court, N.D. Ohio · Nov 10, 2021

    : Plaintiff, : OPINION & ORDER : [Resolving Docs. 9, 18] v … Specifically, the Court must decide whether this claim is primarily representational, reserving it to the National Labor Relations Board’s exclusive jurisdiction.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • R.S. v. Lucas County Children Services

    District Court, N.D. Ohio · Mar 8, 2023

    Defendants West, Hickey, Von Sacken, Mowery, Lucas County Children Services and the Board of Commissioners of Lucas County, and Board member Laura Lloyd-Jenkins filed a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings seeking dismissal … (citing Scott v. First S. Nat’l Bank, 936 F.3d 509, 522 (6th Cir. 2019)); see also Radvansky v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Kaminski v. Chrysler Corp.

    983 F. Supp. 1128 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Aug 29, 1997

    Kaminski’s grievance at the Appeal Board, but International UAW representative Larry Leach later decided to withdraw the grievance. On March 12, 1996, Mr. … Wayda notified the Plaintiff by letter that “[Local UAW] has been informed that your grievance has been withdrawn without precedent at the Appeal Board level.”

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Akhigbe v. University of Akron

    District Court, N.D. Ohio · Mar 29, 2024

    UA also passed Board Resolution 7-7-20, which eliminated 96 AAUP bargaining unit positions, including Plaintiffs’ positions. … (quoting Brown v. Lexington- Fayette Urban Cty. Gov’t, 483 F.App’x. 221, 227 (6th Cir. 2012)). Dr.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Thomas v. Morgan

    109 F. Supp. 2d 763 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Aug 25, 2000

    See Maleng v. … See, Williamson v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Gay v. Extended Family Concepts

    102 F. Supp. 2d 449 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jun 27, 2000

    Arnold v. … Green River Regional Mental Health/Mental Retardation Board, 985 F.2d 560 (TABLE), 1993 WL 20126 (6th Cir. Jan.28, 1993) (no discussion); see also Toth v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • United States v. Ellis

    414 F. Supp. 2d 780 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Nov 2, 2005

    Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. 590, 602 , 95 S.Ct. 2254 , 45 L.Ed.2d 416 (1975). United States v. Lopez-Arias, 344 F.3d 623, 629 (6th Cir.2003). … Id. at 690 , 102 S.Ct. 2664 ; Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Federal Deposit Insurance v. Timbalier Towing Co.

    497 F. Supp. 912 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Aug 28, 1980

    Co. v. … Board of Commissioners v. United States, 308 U.S. 343, 350 [, 60 S.Ct. 285, 288 , 84 L.Ed. 313 ]. D’Oench, supra, 315 U.S. at 469-72 , 62 S.Ct. at 685-86 .

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Jevnikar v. Slawinski

    District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jul 22, 2025

    Ohio 2019) (citing Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989)), and the Court need not “conjure allegations” on her behalf, Erwin, 22 F. … Brown v. Chapman, 814 F.3d 436, 443 (6th Cir. 2016) (quoting Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178, 182 (1962)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Elwell v. University Hospital Home Health Care Services

    76 F. Supp. 2d 805 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Nov 2, 1999

    Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. at 250, 106 S.Ct. 2505 ; Street v. J.C. Bradford & Co., 886 F.2d 1472, 1477 (6th Cir.1989). … The United States Supreme Court in Skidmore v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Premium Building Products Co. v. United Steelworkers of America

    616 F. Supp. 512 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Aug 16, 1985

    General Telephone Co. of Ohio v. Communications Workers of America, AFL-CIO, 648 F.2d 452, 457 (6th Cir.1981). See also Johnston Boiler Co. v. … This court cannot establish an across-the-board ruling that public policy requires that anyone caught smoking marijuana at their workplace is subject to discharge in all cases.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Alwawi

    District Court, N.D. Ohio · Mar 17, 2026

    See Kong v. … of the time to appeal to the Board.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Gino's Awards Inc v. AKF Inc.

    District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jul 11, 2025

    According to Plaintiffs, “Defendants1 1 Plaintiffs sued four Defendants: (i) Fundkite; (ii) Ethan Brown; (iii) ECP Business Capital; and (iv) Suncoast Lending. (See Doc. No. 1-1 at PageID #7.) … See Humphrey v. U.S. Attorney General’s Office, 279 Fed.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Moore v. City of Cleveland

    388 F. Supp. 3d 908 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · May 21, 2019

    Shirey , 293 F.3d 315 , 320 (6th Cir. 2002) (alterations in original) (quoting Brown v. City of Niota , 214 F.3d 718 , 722-23 (6th Cir.2000) ). … Co. v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.