Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersohnd

4,048 results

1.55s

  • Philpott

    District Court, N.D. Ohio · Nov 25, 2025

    See Comstock v. McCray, 273 F.3d 693, 703 (6th Cir. 2011); Brown v. Muskegon Cnty. Jail, 1:19-cv- 236, 2019 WL 2482359, at *5 (W.D. Mich. June 14, 2019) (citing Daniels v. Williams, 474 U.S. 327, 332–36, 106 S. … See Wilson v. Garcia, 471 U.S. 261, 266–67, 105 S. Ct. 1938, 85 L. Ed. 2d 245 (1985). The Sixth Circuit applies Ohio’s two year personal injury statute of limitations to § 1983 claims. Brown v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Bell v. Zurich American Insurance

    156 F. Supp. 3d 884 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Dec 22, 2015

    TOL Aviation, Inc. v. Intercargo Ins. Co., 2006-Ohio-6061 , 2006 WL 3334556 , at *13 (Ohio Ct.App. Nov. 17, 2006); see also Brown v. Guarantee Title & Trust / ARTA, 1996 WL 488004 , at *4 (Ohio Ct.App. … Garden City Osteopathic Hosp. v. HBE Corp., 55 F.3d 1126 , 1130 (6th Cir.1995) (citing Erie R.R. v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64 , 58 S.Ct. 817 , 82 L.Ed. 1188 (1938)).

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Zinganything, LLC v. Import Store

    158 F. Supp. 3d 668 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jan 22, 2016

    Defendant is engaged in “across the board” intellectual property infringement and counterfeiting, and is attempting to ‘pass off counterfeit goods as products associated with plaintiff. (SAC ¶ 43.) … Feist Publ’ns, Inc. v. Rural Tel. Serv. Co., 499 U.S. 340, 361 , 111 S.Ct. 1282 , 113 L.Ed.2d 358 (1991); Stromback v.

    Cited 78 timesPublished
  • Madrigal v. Bagley

    276 F. Supp. 2d 744 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Aug 5, 2003

    Kerekes described the baggy pants as jeans, while Tracy described them as brown “Dickies” brand pants with cuts on the legs. … California v. Brown, 479 U.S. 538, 541 , 107 S.Ct. 837 , 93 L.Ed.2d 934 (1987). However, Ohio law does not mandate that a trial court give a mercy instruction. Mapes, 171 F.3d at 415-16 .

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Nails v. Progressive Insurance Company

    District Court, N.D. Ohio · Mar 4, 2025

    See Hill v. Lappin, 630 F.3d 468, 470–71 (6th Cir. 2010) (holding that the dismissal standard articulated in Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 (2009) and Bell Atl. Corp. v. … Wells v. Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989). Upon review, the Court finds that Plaintiff’s complaint must be dismissed under § 1915(e)(2)(B).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • JWP/Hyre Electric Co. v. Mentor Village School District

    968 F. Supp. 356 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Feb 9, 1996

    Inland Refuse Transfer Co. v. Browning-Ferris Industries of Ohio, Inc., 15 Ohio St.3d 321, 474 N.E.2d 271, 272 (1984). MEVSD relies on four different sections of the contract. This Court will deal with each in turn. A. … Plumbers, Inc. v. Groves Ventures Co., 412 F.2d 202, 207 (6th Cir.1969); Carrabine Constr. Co. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Massey v. Whittaker Corp., Winters Industry Div.

    661 F. Supp. 1151 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jun 12, 1987

    Id. 107 S.Ct. at 1837 ; Hildebrand v. Board of Trustees, 607 F.2d 705 , 708 (6th Cir.1979), cert. denied, 456 U.S. 910 , 102 S.Ct. 1760 , 72 L.Ed.2d 168 (1982). 1 II. The plaintiff has pleaded a hybrid § 301 action. … See Dairy Queen, Inc. v. Wood, 369 U.S. 469, 473 , 82 S.Ct. 894, 897 , 8 L.Ed.2d 44 (1962); Beacon Theaters, Inc. v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Cheers Sports Bar & Grill v. DirecTV, Inc.

    563 F. Supp. 2d 812 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jul 3, 2008

    Storek & Storek, Inc. v. Citicorp Real Estate, Inc., 100 Cal.App.4th 44, 55 , 122 Cal.Rptr.2d 267 (Cal.Ct.App.2002); see also Brown v. Otto C. … Pappas Co. v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Aquila v. Eppinger

    District Court, N.D. Ohio · Aug 21, 2019

    See Thomas v. … See DiCenzi v. Rose, 452 F.3d 465, 471 (6th Cir. 2006); Stokes v. Leonard, 36 Fed. Appx. 801, 804 (6th Cir.2002); Lott v. Coyle, 261 F.3d 594, 605-606 (6th Cir. 2001).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Dean v. Veterans Administration, Regional Office

    151 F.R.D. 83 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Sep 13, 1993

    United States v. Reynolds, 345 U.S. 1, 9-10 , 73 S.Ct. 528, 533 , 97 L.Ed. 727 (1953). In Sperandeo v. … See Forstmann Leff Assocs., Inc. v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Cisternino v. Social Security Administration

    District Court, N.D. Ohio · Mar 26, 2024

    See Bassett v. Nat'l Collegiate Ath. Ass'n, 528 F.3d 426, 437 (6th Cir. 2008); Wells v. … Brown, 891 F.2d 591, 594 (6th Cir. 1989) (liberal construction for pro se litigants does not “abrogate basic pleading requirements”).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Watson v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company

    District Court, N.D. Ohio · Aug 16, 2019

    Seals v. Gen. Motors Corp., 546 F.3d 766, 770 (6th Cir. 2008). An amendment is futile if it could not withstand a Federal Rule 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss. See, e.g., Brown v. Owens Corning Inv. … P. 12(b)(6); see also Brown, 622 F.3d at 574.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Pringle v. Continental Tire North America, Inc.

    541 F. Supp. 2d 924 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jul 31, 2007

    Many of them, including Maurer v. Joy Technologies, 212 F.3d 907 , 914-15 (6th Cir.2000), rely on the following language from UAW v. … Golden v. Kelsey-Hayes Co., 73 F.3d 648, 656 (6th Cir.1996).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Wiese USA, Inc. v. Haulotte Group / Bil-Jax, Inc.

    District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jun 7, 2022

    Garza v. Lansing Sch. Dist., 972 F.3d 853, 877 (6th Cir. 2020) (quoting Brown v. Tidwell, 169 F.3d 330, 332 (6th Cir. 1999) (per curiam)). … Watkins v. Brown, 646 N.E.2d 485, 487 (Ohio Ct. App. 1994); see also Pica Corp. v. Clarendon Am. Ins. Co., 339 F. App’x 540, 541-42 (6th Cir. 2009) (quoting Watkins).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Jones v. United States

    857 F. Supp. 587 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Apr 22, 1994

    See Dole v. Elliott Travel & Tours, Inc., 942 F.2d 962, 968-69 (6th Cir.1991) (quoting State Mut. Life Assurance Co. of Am. v. Deer Creek Park, 612 F.2d 259, 264 (6th Cir.1979) and citing Adickes v. S.H. … Browning-Ferris Indus. of Ohio, Inc., 15 Ohio St.3d 321, 322 , 15 OBR 448, 448, 474 N.E.2d 271, 272 (1984). The sales agreement unambiguously provides that the Seller, Sam B. Jones, sole stockholder of the Bryan F.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Danielson v. Fletcher

    770 F. Supp. 388 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Aug 7, 1991

    Functions as voting member of Source Evaluation Board when appointed. Assists in debriefing unsuccessful offerors. … Wooden v. Board of Education of Jefferson County, Kentucky, 931 F.2d 376, 378 (6th Cir.1991). In Texas Department of Community Affairs v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • At&T CORP. v. City of Toledo

    351 F. Supp. 2d 744 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jan 3, 2005

    The court stated, “[n]o board has power to determine for all time just how a highway shall be used. The use may be changed as the new conditions demand.” Id. … OTR v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Alford v. Ohio Adult Parole Authorities

    District Court, N.D. Ohio · Oct 15, 2021

    See Allen v. … Wood v. Brown, Case No. 2: 20 CV 12576, 2021 WL 2311930, at *2–4 (E.D. Mich., 2021), citing White v. Lambert, 370 F. 3d 1002, 1008 (9th Cir. 2004); overruled on other grounds by Hayward v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Briscoe v. Mohr

    District Court, N.D. Ohio · Nov 1, 2021

    ODRC Defendants moved in limine to exclude the proffer of evidence and arguments that Plaintiff Briscoe suffered collateral injuries because his security classification increased after his Rules Infraction Board hearing … conviction.13 This Court GRANTED in part and DENIED in part this motion.14 Plaintiff was allowed to proffer evidence that the Rules Infraction Board hearing conviction elevated his security classification from Level

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Farmer

    District Court, N.D. Ohio · Mar 12, 2026

    The email signature represents Farmer as a “Board Member,” but at that time, Farmer was not on the Board. Further, at no point did Long did not tender her resignation to Farmer. … Yellowbook Inc. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.