Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersohnd

4,048 results

0.72s

  • Carstens v. Great Lakes Towing Co.

    71 F. Supp. 394 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Nov 15, 1945

    In Kunschman v. … Western Fuel Co. v. Garcia, 257 U.S. 233, 240 , 42 S.Ct. 89 , 66 L. Ed. 210 ; United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corporation v. Greenwald, [2 Cir.], 16 F.2d 948 .

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Lemon v. BWX TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

    369 F. Supp. 2d 919 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · May 20, 2005

    The Plan requires that any action BWX takes be made by resolution of its board of directors, or by a written instrument executed by persons the board has empowered to make such decisions. (Id. at Art. 5, § 5.1). III. … Trzebuckowski v. City of Cleveland, 319 F.3d 853, 855 (6th Cir.2003) (quoting Hishon v. King & Spalding, 467 U.S. 69, 73, 104 S.Ct. 2229 , 81 L.Ed.2d 59 (1984)). V. Discussion A.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Nataren

    District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jan 28, 2026

    See, e.g., Zadvydas v. … In the first instance, such review should proceed before the Board of Immigration Appeals to “apply its experience and expertise without judicial interference.” Khalili v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Amaya-Velis

    District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jan 14, 2026

    See, e.g., Zadvydas v. … In the first instance, such review should proceed before the Board of Immigration Appeals to “apply its experience and expertise without judicial interference.” Khalili v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • McGinness v. Internal Revenue Service

    898 F. Supp. 552 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Mar 27, 1995

    Tonti v. Tonti, 118 N.E.2d 200, 202 (Ohio App.1954). In this capacity, receivers possess no interest in or lien on the property over which they have been appointed. See, e.g., Mine Safety Appliances Co. v. … See, e.g., Meyer v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Marrow v. SSOE, Inc.

    District Court, N.D. Ohio · Apr 21, 2022

    Connin v. Bailey, 15 Ohio St. 3d 34, 36 (1984). … See Thirty-Four Corp. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • United States v. Labine

    73 F. Supp. 2d 853 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Mar 25, 1999

    Stein v. Brown, 18 Ohio St.3d 305, 308 , 480 N.E.2d 1121, 1124 (1985). i. The Conveyance Element one is clearly fulfilled because the transfer of the residence to the trust constitutes a conveyance. … Stein v. Brown, 18 Ohio St.3d 305, 308 , 480 N.E.2d 1121, 1124 (1985) citing Gleason v. Bell, 91 Ohio St. 268 , 110 N.E. 513 (1915).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Mbonga

    District Court, N.D. Ohio · Nov 7, 2025

    During the pendency of his appeal to the Board, Petitioner Mbonga also filed a writ of habeas corpus in the N.D. of Ohio Federal Court. See Amaya-Cruz, et al. v. U.S. … “While his appeal before [the Sixth Circuit] was pending, [Mbonga] filed a motion to reopen immigration proceedings before the Board in February 2021.” Mbonga v. Garland, No. 22-3851, 2023 U.S. App.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Rubber City Machinery Corp. v. Pergl

    District Court, N.D. Ohio · Dec 8, 2023

    Myers v. Boardman Local School District Board of Education, Case No. 2022 WL 2666746, at *2 (N.D. … Moskovitz v. Mt. Sinai Med. Ctr., 69 Ohio St.3d 638, 650 (1994); see also Brown v. Whirlpool Corp., 996 F.Supp.2d 623, 647 (N.D.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Flagg v. Staples the Office Superstore East, Inc.

    138 F. Supp. 3d 908 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Sep 29, 2015

    Brown v. VHS of Michigan, Inc., 545 Fed.Appx. 368, 372 (6th Cir.2013). … Brown v. Denny (1991), 72 Ohio App.3d 417, 423 , 594 N.E.2d 1008, 1012 . Here, Flagg has failed to point to any evidence of injury sufficient to support an IIED claim.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Steward

    District Court, N.D. Ohio · Oct 20, 2025

    Bd. v. Bannum Place of Saginaw, LLC, 97 F.4th 351, 359 (6th Cir. 2024) (quoting Swallows v. … the board of the first entity selected the board of the second entity and the second entity’s board chairman was the executive director of the first entity); E.E.O.C. v. Care Ctrs. Mgmt. Consulting, Inc., 942 F.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Bloedow v. CSX Transportation, Inc.

    638 F. Supp. 2d 831 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jul 31, 2009

    Ashcroft v. … In Reid v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Baker v. National City Bank of Cleveland

    387 F. Supp. 1137 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jun 12, 1974

    Wymard v. … Reserve Board Regulation V, 32A C.F.R. § 239.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Jama v. United States Citizenship & Immigration Services

    962 F. Supp. 2d 939 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Aug 19, 2013

    Co. v. … V.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Jaques v. Herbert

    447 F. Supp. 2d 858 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Aug 24, 2006

    In its January 2005 meeting, the Executive Board found that the Union had properly handled Jaques’s grievance. … The 180- or 300-day time period “is akin to a statute of limitations,” Brown v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Soto v. Siekfer

    District Court, N.D. Ohio · Nov 30, 2021

    Soto also argues that the Magistrate Judge failed to give effect to Brown v. Ohio, which prohibits “dividing a single crime into a series of temporal or spatial units.” 432 U.S 161, 169 (1977) (emphasis added). … As the Magistrate Judge correctly noted, Brown says nothing about whether jeopardy attached to a previous charge that was dismissed as part of a plea agreement. In his discussion of Brown and elsewhere, Mr.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Gray v. City of Toledo

    323 F. Supp. 1281 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Mar 10, 1971

    Dombrowski v. Pfister, 380 U.S. 479 , 85 S.Ct. 1116 , 14 L.Ed.2d 22 (1965). In Muller v. … Stack v. Adams, supra; Wisconsin State Employees Association v. Wisconsin Natural Resources Board, supra; cf. 5 U.S.C. § 1502 (a).

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • Martin v. Bennett

    District Court, N.D. Ohio · Mar 24, 2022

    Brown v. VHS of 21 Michigan, Inc., 545 Fed. Appx 368, 372 (6th Cir. 2013). See also Wierengo v. Akal Sec., Inc., 580 Fed. … See Brown, 545 Fed. Appx at 372; Wierengo, 580 Fed. Appx at 369 n.1; Hicks, 449 Fed. Appx at 487.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Ann Arbor R. v. City of Toledo

    33 F.2d 939 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Apr 15, 1929

    However, in Board of Education v. Moorehead, 105 Ohio St. 237 , 242, 243, 136 N. … In Foglesong Machine Co. v. J. D. Randall Co. (1917, C. C.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • A.S. v. Elyria City Schools

    District Court, N.D. Ohio · Aug 7, 2024

    But unlike the Individual Defendants, the Board is a municipal entity not protected by qualified immunity. Moldowan v. City of Warren, 578 F.3d 351, 392 (6th Cir. 2009) (citation omitted). … Under Ohio law, school districts are not suable entities; it is the board of education that can be sued. Ohio Rev. Code § 3313.17; Est. of Olsen v. Fairfield City Sch. Dist. Bd. of Educ., 341 F.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.