Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
4,048 results
0.72s
Carstens v. Great Lakes Towing Co.
71 F. Supp. 394 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Nov 15, 1945
In Kunschman v. … Western Fuel Co. v. Garcia, 257 U.S. 233, 240 , 42 S.Ct. 89 , 66 L. Ed. 210 ; United States Shipping Board Emergency Fleet Corporation v. Greenwald, [2 Cir.], 16 F.2d 948 .
Cited 5 timesPublishedLemon v. BWX TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
369 F. Supp. 2d 919 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · May 20, 2005
The Plan requires that any action BWX takes be made by resolution of its board of directors, or by a written instrument executed by persons the board has empowered to make such decisions. (Id. at Art. 5, § 5.1). III. … Trzebuckowski v. City of Cleveland, 319 F.3d 853, 855 (6th Cir.2003) (quoting Hishon v. King & Spalding, 467 U.S. 69, 73, 104 S.Ct. 2229 , 81 L.Ed.2d 59 (1984)). V. Discussion A.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · Jan 28, 2026
See, e.g., Zadvydas v. … In the first instance, such review should proceed before the Board of Immigration Appeals to “apply its experience and expertise without judicial interference.” Khalili v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · Jan 14, 2026
See, e.g., Zadvydas v. … In the first instance, such review should proceed before the Board of Immigration Appeals to “apply its experience and expertise without judicial interference.” Khalili v.
Cited 0 timesUnknownMcGinness v. Internal Revenue Service
898 F. Supp. 552 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Mar 27, 1995
Tonti v. Tonti, 118 N.E.2d 200, 202 (Ohio App.1954). In this capacity, receivers possess no interest in or lien on the property over which they have been appointed. See, e.g., Mine Safety Appliances Co. v. … See, e.g., Meyer v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · Apr 21, 2022
Connin v. Bailey, 15 Ohio St. 3d 34, 36 (1984). … See Thirty-Four Corp. v.
Cited 0 timesUnknown73 F. Supp. 2d 853 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Mar 25, 1999
Stein v. Brown, 18 Ohio St.3d 305, 308 , 480 N.E.2d 1121, 1124 (1985). i. The Conveyance Element one is clearly fulfilled because the transfer of the residence to the trust constitutes a conveyance. … Stein v. Brown, 18 Ohio St.3d 305, 308 , 480 N.E.2d 1121, 1124 (1985) citing Gleason v. Bell, 91 Ohio St. 268 , 110 N.E. 513 (1915).
Cited 4 timesPublishedDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · Nov 7, 2025
During the pendency of his appeal to the Board, Petitioner Mbonga also filed a writ of habeas corpus in the N.D. of Ohio Federal Court. See Amaya-Cruz, et al. v. U.S. … “While his appeal before [the Sixth Circuit] was pending, [Mbonga] filed a motion to reopen immigration proceedings before the Board in February 2021.” Mbonga v. Garland, No. 22-3851, 2023 U.S. App.
Cited 0 timesUnknownRubber City Machinery Corp. v. Pergl
District Court, N.D. Ohio · Dec 8, 2023
Myers v. Boardman Local School District Board of Education, Case No. 2022 WL 2666746, at *2 (N.D. … Moskovitz v. Mt. Sinai Med. Ctr., 69 Ohio St.3d 638, 650 (1994); see also Brown v. Whirlpool Corp., 996 F.Supp.2d 623, 647 (N.D.
Cited 0 timesUnknownFlagg v. Staples the Office Superstore East, Inc.
138 F. Supp. 3d 908 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Sep 29, 2015
Brown v. VHS of Michigan, Inc., 545 Fed.Appx. 368, 372 (6th Cir.2013). … Brown v. Denny (1991), 72 Ohio App.3d 417, 423 , 594 N.E.2d 1008, 1012 . Here, Flagg has failed to point to any evidence of injury sufficient to support an IIED claim.
Cited 14 timesPublishedDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · Oct 20, 2025
Bd. v. Bannum Place of Saginaw, LLC, 97 F.4th 351, 359 (6th Cir. 2024) (quoting Swallows v. … the board of the first entity selected the board of the second entity and the second entity’s board chairman was the executive director of the first entity); E.E.O.C. v. Care Ctrs. Mgmt. Consulting, Inc., 942 F.
Cited 0 timesUnknownBloedow v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
638 F. Supp. 2d 831 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jul 31, 2009
Ashcroft v. … In Reid v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedBaker v. National City Bank of Cleveland
387 F. Supp. 1137 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Jun 12, 1974
Wymard v. … Reserve Board Regulation V, 32A C.F.R. § 239.
Cited 4 timesPublishedJama v. United States Citizenship & Immigration Services
962 F. Supp. 2d 939 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Aug 19, 2013
Co. v. … V.
Cited 4 timesPublished447 F. Supp. 2d 858 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Aug 24, 2006
In its January 2005 meeting, the Executive Board found that the Union had properly handled Jaques’s grievance. … The 180- or 300-day time period “is akin to a statute of limitations,” Brown v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · Nov 30, 2021
Soto also argues that the Magistrate Judge failed to give effect to Brown v. Ohio, which prohibits “dividing a single crime into a series of temporal or spatial units.” 432 U.S 161, 169 (1977) (emphasis added). … As the Magistrate Judge correctly noted, Brown says nothing about whether jeopardy attached to a previous charge that was dismissed as part of a plea agreement. In his discussion of Brown and elsewhere, Mr.
Cited 0 timesUnknown323 F. Supp. 1281 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Mar 10, 1971
Dombrowski v. Pfister, 380 U.S. 479 , 85 S.Ct. 1116 , 14 L.Ed.2d 22 (1965). In Muller v. … Stack v. Adams, supra; Wisconsin State Employees Association v. Wisconsin Natural Resources Board, supra; cf. 5 U.S.C. § 1502 (a).
Cited 26 timesPublishedDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · Mar 24, 2022
Brown v. VHS of 21 Michigan, Inc., 545 Fed. Appx 368, 372 (6th Cir. 2013). See also Wierengo v. Akal Sec., Inc., 580 Fed. … See Brown, 545 Fed. Appx at 372; Wierengo, 580 Fed. Appx at 369 n.1; Hicks, 449 Fed. Appx at 487.
Cited 0 timesUnknownAnn Arbor R. v. City of Toledo
33 F.2d 939 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Apr 15, 1929
However, in Board of Education v. Moorehead, 105 Ohio St. 237 , 242, 243, 136 N. … In Foglesong Machine Co. v. J. D. Randall Co. (1917, C. C.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · Aug 7, 2024
But unlike the Individual Defendants, the Board is a municipal entity not protected by qualified immunity. Moldowan v. City of Warren, 578 F.3d 351, 392 (6th Cir. 2009) (citation omitted). … Under Ohio law, school districts are not suable entities; it is the board of education that can be sued. Ohio Rev. Code § 3313.17; Est. of Olsen v. Fairfield City Sch. Dist. Bd. of Educ., 341 F.
Cited 0 timesUnknown
Ask Donna