Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersohioctapp

10,000+ results

1.26s

  • Eaton v. Bd. of County Commrs.

    49 Ohio App. 2d 24 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 30, 1974

    Richards v. Industrial Commission (1955), 163 Ohio St. 439 . ■ The first assignment of error is overruled. rr. … The Supreme Court of Ohio, in Lariccia v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Quinton v. Delaware Cty. Bd. of Revision

    2024 Ohio 6034 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 26, 2024

    See Lunn v. Lorain County Board of Revision, 2016-Ohio-8075, ¶ 13. … Freshwater v. Belmont County Board of Revision, 80 Ohio St.3d 26, 28 (1997).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Lima Pub. Library Bd. of Trustees v. State Emp. Relations Bd.

    2011 Ohio 1730 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 11, 2011

    Provisions Plus, Inc. v. Ohio Liquor Control Comm., 10th Dist. No. 03AP-670, 2004-Ohio-592, ¶7, quoting Lies v. Veterinary Med. … v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • In Re Kucharski

    56 Ohio App. 2d 121 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Sep 20, 1977

    The Common Pleas Court properly considered whether or not the Board of County Commissioners complied with. R. C. 709.033. Lariccia v. Board of Commrs. (1974), 38 Ohio St. 2d 99 ; see Cincinnati Bell v. … Lariccia v. Board of Commrs., 38 Ohio St. 2d 99 (1974).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • State v. Hutchinson

    135 Ohio App. 3d 459 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 20, 1999

    That night Eura took J.S. to the Brown County Hospital, where J.S. was given a physical examination and was referred to the Brown County Department of Human Services. … In State v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • State v. Boldin, 2007-G-2808 (12-5-2008)

    2008 Ohio 6408 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 5, 2008

    On the contrary, the Supreme Court specifically adopted the reasoning of the Twelfth Appellate District in State v. … Id., citing State v. Mitchell (1983), 6 Ohio St.3d 416 , 419 .

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Dean v. Cuyahoga Cty. Fiscal Office

    2019 Ohio 5115 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 12, 2019

    A hearing was held on September 5, 2017, at the Board of Revision. … Jenkins v. Cleveland, 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 104768, 2017- Ohio-1054, ¶ 8, citing Johnson v. Microsoft Corp., 106 Ohio St.3d 278, 2005-Ohio- 4985, 834 N.E.2d 791, ¶ 6.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State v. Flowers, 07-Ma-68 (12-17-2007)

    2007 Ohio 6920 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 17, 2007

    . {¶ 12} Appellant cites to State v. Brown , 166 Ohio App.3d 638 , 852 N.E.2d 1228 , 2006-Ohio-1172 , and State v. Beagle , 2d Dist. No. 2002-CA-59, 2003-Ohio-4331 , for support. … And in Brown , the court found it important that there was no evidence of erratic driving such as weaving, swerving, or driving left of center. Brown , 166 Ohio App.3d at ¶ 29.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Bucilli v. Hoffman

    8 Ohio App. 85 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 15, 1918

    The action of forcible entry and detainer was brought by Hoffman in the court of the defendant Brown, a justice of the peace. … In Steele v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Cox v. Miami Cty. Bd. of Zoning Appeals

    2011 Ohio 2820 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 10, 2011

    [Cite as Cox v. Miami Cty. Bd. of Zoning Appeals, 2011-Ohio-2820.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF MIAMI COUNTY, OHIO : DON E. COX, ET AL. … Kisil v. Sandusky (1984), 12 Ohio St.3d 30, 34.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Wilson v. Stark Cty. Dept. of Job & Family Servs.

    2015 Ohio 5326 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 14, 2015

    Browning–Ferris Inds. of Ohio, Inc., 15 Ohio St.3d 321, 474 N.E.2d 271 (1984). A fact is material if it affects the outcome of the case under the applicable substantive law. Russell v. … Henkle v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In re Adoption of M.S.A.

    2017 Ohio 5771 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 10, 2017

    Bd. v. Mercer Cty. Common Pleas Court, Prob. Div., ___ Ohio St.3d ___, 2016-Ohio-7382, ¶ 2, fn.1. … Crow v. Baldino, 2d Dist. Clark No. 2016-CA-56, 2017-Ohio- 2779, ¶ 8, citing State ex rel. Merrill v. Ohio Dept. of Natural Resources, 130 Ohio St.3d 30, 2011-Ohio-4612, ¶ 41.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Industrial Commission v. Collela

    17 Ohio App. 301 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 16, 1923

    It has been held by the Supreme Court of Ohio, Roma v. … such an unsubstantial error as this, or make a remittitur on account thereof; but we do find that the jury committed an error in allowing a lump sum of $630; and, following the rule announced by the Supreme Court in Roma v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Udf v. State Liquor Control Board, Unpublished Decision (11-16-1999)

    Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 16, 1999

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Banker's Choice, L.L.C. v. Cincinnati Zoning Bd. of Appeals

    2019 Ohio 4854 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 27, 2019

    Id., citing Briggs v. Pennsylvania RR. … Douglas v. Burlew, 106 Ohio St.3d 180, 2005-Ohio-4382, 833 N.E.2d 293, ¶ 11.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Resco Holdings, L.C.C. v. AIU Insurance Co.

    112 N.E.3d 503 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jul 19, 2018

    Browning Stephen P. Brown Patrick E. … For example, in Sivit v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Moore v. Fornshell

    2025 Ohio 65 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 13, 2025

    Trust Co. v. … Bailey v. Republic Engineered Steels, Inc., 2001-Ohio-236, ¶ 8; Cleveland Elec. Illuminating Co. v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Ebeling, Admx. v. Harman, Admx.

    83 Ohio App. 519 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 30, 1948

    By THE COURT: This is an application for a rehearing and a motion to certify as being in conflict with the decision expressed by the Court of Appeals of Lucas County, Ohio, in the case of Brown, Admr., v Bauman, 49 Oh Ap … The motion to certify will be overruled as we held that the petition met the requirements laid down in Brown, Admr. v Bauman, 49 Oh Ap 49, and there is no conflict. WISEMAN, PJ, MILLER and HORNBECK, JJ, concur.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Ohio Assn. of Pub. School Emps. v. School Emps. Retirement Sys. of Ohio

    2020 Ohio 3005 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 19, 2020

    Co. v. … Young v. Univ. of Akron, 10th Dist.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Haydocy v. Ohio Pub. Emp. Retirement Sys.

    2025 Ohio 2056 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 10, 2025

    “R.C. 145.11(A) imposes upon the board a general duty to safeguard and prudently invest the funds entrusted to it.” State ex rel. Tarrier v. Pub. Emps. Retirement Bd., 2021-Ohio-649, ¶ 21. … Van Dyke v. Pub. Emps.

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.