Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersohioctapp

10,000+ results

1.61s

  • Montgomery v. Montgomery, 06ap-555 (6-7-2007)

    2007 Ohio 2787 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 7, 2007

    Rose Chevrolet, Inc. v. Adams (1988), 36 Ohio St.3d 17 ; App.R. 9(B) and 10(A). … Knapp v. Edwards Laboratories (1980), 61 Ohio St.2d 197 , 199 .

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brondes Ford Maumee Ltd. v. KJAMS, L.L.C.

    91 N.E.3d 306 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 26, 2017

    CI0201505050 Appellee v. … Co. v. Professionals Ins.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Akron City School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Summit Cty. Bd. of Revision

    2025 Ohio 250 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 29, 2025

    Willow Grove, Ltd. v. Olmsted Twp. … Bd. of Ed. v. Delaware Cty.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Dept. of Neighborhood Assistance v. Helms

    2021 Ohio 2667 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 4, 2021

    [Cite as Dept. of Neighborhood Assistance v. Helms, 2021-Ohio-2667.] … “This Court has held that a board enters its final order for purposes of perfecting an appeal when it sends written notification of its decision to the party.” Chapman v. Hous. Appeals Bd., 9th Dist.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • In re A.Y.

    2022 Ohio 739 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 11, 2022

    State v. … State v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Panther II Transp., Inc. v. Seville Bd. of Tax Rev.

    2012 Ohio 3525 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 6, 2012

    Bd. of Edn. v. … Accord Coventry Twp. v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. McClair v. State Emp't Relations Bd.

    128 N.E.3d 727 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 26, 2018

    CI0201603920 v. … federal statutes which empower the National Labor Relations Board; therefore, federal cases are instructive, but not controlling. State Emp. Relations Bd. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Pringle v. Clermont Cty. Bd. of Elections

    2019 Ohio 4528 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 4, 2019

    Pringle v. Clermont Cty. Bd. of Elections, 2019-Ohio-4528.] … Rice v. CertainTeed Corp., 84 Ohio St.3d 417, 419 (1999). "We must give effect to all the provisions * * *." State v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Gaither v. Kelleys Island Local School Dist. Bd. of Edn.

    2023 Ohio 1299 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 21, 2023

    Harris v. Hilderbrand, 2022-Ohio-1555, 191 N.E.3d 1143, ¶ 41 (7th Dist.). 8. pleadings.’” Davis v. Mercy St. Vincent Med. … Hoeflinger v. AM Mart, LLC, 2017-Ohio-7530, 96 N.E.3d 1247, ¶ 15 (6th Dist.), quoting State ex rel. AFSCME v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • State v. Moore

    2018 Ohio 318 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 26, 2018

    State v. Moore, 2d Dist. … State v. Moore, 2d Dist.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Baab v. Medina City Schools Bd. of Edn.

    2015 Ohio 5315 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 21, 2015

    [Cite as Baab v. Medina City Schools Bd. of Edn., 2015-Ohio-5315.] … See Collins v. Hearty Invest. Trust, 9th Dist.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Franklin County Sheriff v. Frazier

    174 Ohio App. 3d 202 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 27, 2007

    Id., citing Our Place, Inc. v. … Under such circumstances, the common pleas court may not substitute its judgment for that of the board. Id., citing Steinbacher v. Louis (1987), 36 Ohio App.3d 68 , 520 N.E.2d 1381 , citing Ogan, supra; Traub v.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Ames v. Portage Cty. Bd. of Commrs.

    2024 Ohio 146 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 16, 2024

    Temple v. Wean United, Inc., 50 Ohio St.2d 317, 327, 364 N.E.2d 267 (1977); Allen v. 5125 Peno, LLC, 2017-Ohio-8941, 101 N.E.3d 484, ¶ 6 (11th Dist.), citing Holliman v. Allstate Ins. … Aames Capital Corp. v. Wells, 9th Dist. Summit No. 20703, 2002 WL 500320, *8 (Apr. 3 2002); Juergens v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Colt's Neck Homeowners Assn. v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Commrs.

    2025 Ohio 113 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 16, 2025

    Byrd v. Faber, 57 Ohio St.3d 56 (1991). … Yanega v. Cuyahoga Cty.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Youngstown Education Ass'n v. Youngstown City Bd. of Education

    36 Ohio App. 2d 35 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 27, 1973

    The Board cannot back away from or delegate this responsibility. As stated in paragraph 7 of the syllabus in Hagerman v. … Evans, v. Fry, 40 Ohio Op. 2d 508 , 509.)

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Niles Edn. Assn. v. Niles City School Dist. Bd. of Edn.

    2020 Ohio 6804 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 21, 2020

    Clark v. … No. 6, Counties of Manistee v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Buckeye Relief, L.L.C. v. Ohio Pharmacy Bd.

    160 N.E.3d 767 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 15, 2020

    Shafer v. Ohio Turnpike Comm., 159 Ohio St. 581, 590, 113 N.E.2d 14 (1953), and MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. Bd. of Franklin Cty. … Dir. v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Scioto Cty. Bd. of Commrs./Revolving Loan Fund Bd. v. McDermott Industries, L.L.C.

    2014 Ohio 240 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 17, 2014

    / REVOLVING LOAN FUND BOARD, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : v … The subsequent dissolution of McDermott did not abate the board’s claim. See Bendure v. Xpert Auto, Inc., 10th Dist.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • State v. Bevan

    80 Ohio App. 3d 126 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 18, 1992

    Terry v. Ohio (1968), 392 U.S. 1 , 88 S.Ct. 1868 , 20 L.Ed.2d 889 ; Brown v. Texas (1979), 443 U.S. 47 , 99 S.Ct. 2637 , 61 L.Ed.2d 357 ; State v. Chatton (1984), 11 Ohio St.3d 59 , 11 OBR 250, 463 N.E.2d 1237 . … State v. Brown (1988), 38 Ohio St.3d 305 , 528 N.E.2d 523 , paragraph four of the syllabus. The second assignment of error is not well taken.

    Cited 57 timesPublished
  • City of Dayton v. Martin

    43 Ohio App. 3d 87 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 21, 1987

    The significance of Elmore’s testimony is that he related a conversation that he claimed to have had with a defense witness, Steven Brown, in which Brown offered his testimony for sale. … Elmore essentially impeached Brown, a defense witness, by testifying that Brown had offered his testimony for sale to the highest bidder.

    Cited 53 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.