Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filtersohioctapp

10,000+ results

1.15s

  • Sachs Corp. of U.S.A. v. Rossmann

    9 Ohio App. 3d 188 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Mar 10, 1983

    This is the standard to which the board of review must adhere when deter *191 mining whether an employee should be denied unemployment compensation benefits. See Taylor v. Bd. of Review (April 17, 1980), Cuyahoga App. … Under these circumstances, we cannot say that the determination of the board that appellee had just cause for quitting was against the manifest weight of the evidence. See R.C. 4141.28(O); Brown-Brockmeyer Co. v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • State v. Madaris

    156 Ohio App. 3d 211 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 13, 2004

    . {¶ 10} In State v. Brown, 1st Dist. Nos. … See State v. Brown, at ¶ 29.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • State ex rel. Mobley v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Commrs.

    2025 Ohio 1422 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 22, 2025

    [V.] … Brown v. N. Lewisburg, 2013-Ohio-3841, ¶ 19 (2d Dist.)

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Bryant v. Kent City School District Board of Education

    71 Ohio App. 3d 748 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 2, 1991

    Democratic Executive Committee v. Brown (1974), 39 Ohio St.2d 157, 161 , 68 O.O.2d 100, 103 , 314 N.E.2d 376, 379 . … Dennis v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown, Unpublished Decision (12-31-2003)

    2003 Ohio 7183 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 31, 2003

    State v. Brown (1988), 38 Ohio St.3d 305 , 310 . However, "[a]bsent state involvement contributing to the witness's pretrial exposure to the defendant, due process guarantees are not implicated." State v. … See, also, Brown at 481; State v. Patterson (Mar. 29, 1996), 11th Dist.

    Cited 50 timesUnpublished
  • State ex rel. DeWine v. Crock Constr. Co.

    2014 Ohio 2944 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 16, 2014

    Balson v. … Browning, Appellant fails to present applicable caselaw. In fact, Browning appears to support the exact opposite position advocated by Appellant.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Gregory v. Sterling Castings

    50 Ohio App. 2d 208 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Oct 22, 1976

    A Court of Common Pleas is limited to the record as certified by the board of review. Hall v. American Brake Shoe Co. (1968), 13 Ohio St. 2d 11, 14 ; Kilgore v. Board of Review (1965), 2 Ohio App. 2d 69, 71 . … Brown, P. J., concurs. Wiley, J., concurs in part and dissents in part. 1 Diehl v. Garns, Admr. Ohio Bureau of Employment, Court of Appeals for Lucas County, No.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Ohio Bd. of Motor Vehicle Repair v. Griffin

    2017 Ohio 9129 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Dec 19, 2017

    No. 15CV-9470) v. … Brannon v. Persons, 2d Dist.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown, 07ca4 (1-16-2008)

    2008 Ohio 175 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 16, 2008

    See State v. Tomlinson , 4th Dist. No. 07CA3, 2007-Ohio-4618 ; State v. Ahmad , 4th Dist. … In State v.

    Cited 2 timesUnpublished
  • Coates Run Property LL, L.L.C. v. Athens Bd. of Zoning Appeals

    2015 Ohio 4732 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 12, 2015

    Cavalaris, Kegler, Brown, Hill & Ritter, LPA, Columbus, Ohio, and David W. Fisher, Kephart Fisher LLC, Columbus, Ohio, for appellee, Athens River Gate, LLC. … Network, Inc. v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Cherry Lane Dev., L.L.C. v. Walnut, C & DD, L.L.C.

    2012 Ohio 3559 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Aug 3, 2012

    [Cite as Cherry Lane Dev., L.L.C. v. Walnut, C & DD, L.L.C., 2012-Ohio-3559.] … Id., citing Schlagheck v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Dry Ridge Development Co. v. Hamilton County Board of Commissioners

    30 Ohio App. 3d 217 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 2, 1986

    of county commissioners constitutes a quorum of the board and is, in law, the board authorized to transact business. … Cupp v. Bd. of Commrs. of Seneca Cty. (1869), 19 Ohio St. 173 ; Kelly v. State, ex rel. Brown Cty. Commrs. (1874), 25 Ohio St. 567 , paragraph three of the syllabus.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In Re Whisner

    45 Ohio App. 365 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 14, 1933

    Acting under favor of the provisions of §10-1, GC, a written complaint was filed in the Court of Common Pleas of Brown County, signed by the requisite number of electors of the Russelville-Jeffersonville school district, … The county board was asked to intervene earlier, under §7610-1, GC, but deferred action until school opened in September, when the county board selected teachers.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Groveport Madison Local Education Ass'n v. Groveport Madison Local Board of Education

    72 Ohio App. 3d 394 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Feb 5, 1991

    A board of education “ ‘ * * * is constituted a body politic and corporate, but it is not a corporation within the provisions of the statutes governing corporations or a corporation for profit * * *.’” Brown v. … This distinction was noted in Finch v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown, 23737 (6-18-2008)

    2008 Ohio 2956 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jun 18, 2008

    Brown's guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. State v. Jenks , 61 Ohio St. 3d 259 , paragraph two of the syllabus (1991). {¶ 3} Mr. … In State v. Rackley , 9th Dist.

    Cited 5 timesUnpublished
  • Zwahlen v. Brown, C-070263 (1-18-2008)

    2008 Ohio 151 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 18, 2008

    Judgment affirmed. 1 GTE Automatic Electric, Inc. v. ARC Industries, Inc. (1976), 47 Ohio St.2d 146 , 351 N.E.2d 113 , paragraph two of the syllabus. 2 Harris v. … No. 02AP-947, 2003-Ohio-1647 , at ¶ 14. 8 Flint v. Holbrook (1992), 80 Ohio App.3d 21 , 25 , 608 N.E.2d 809 . 9 Id. 10 Caruso-Ciresi, Inc. v. Lohman (1983), 5 Ohio St.3d 64 , 66 , 448 N.E.2d 1365 . 11 Colley v.

    Cited 11 timesUnpublished
  • Krawczyszyn v. Ohio Bureau of Employment Services

    54 Ohio App. 3d 35 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Jan 3, 1989

    We note at the outset that the determination of factual issues is within the province of the referee and the board of review. Brown-Brockmeyer Co. v. Roach (1947), 148 Ohio St. 511 , 36 O.O. 167 , 76 N.E. 2d 79 . … If the board’s decision is not unlawful, unreasonable or against the manifest weight of the evidence, then the common pleas court should affirm the board’s decision. See R.C. 4141.28(0).

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • State v. Moore

    2019 Ohio 1467 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Apr 10, 2019

    and to be imposed by the parole board.” {¶10} In State v. … See State v. Brown, 4th Dist.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Baker v. Ohio Bureau of Employment Services

    115 Ohio App. 3d 675 · Ohio Court of Appeals · Nov 21, 1996

    We note with interest a portion of a concurring opinion in Irvine , wherein Justice Clifford Brown stated: “Just as a court of appeals and this court should not be a super zoning board of review, as we have often stated, … Peyton v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Holland Furnace Co. v. Schneider

    109 Ohio App. 517 · Ohio Court of Appeals · May 18, 1959

    However, on appeal to the Dayton Regional Board of Review, the decision of the Administrator was reversed and the claim was allowed. … Federated Department Stores, Inc., v. Brown, 165 Ohio St., 521 , 138 N.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.