Case law

State ex rel. Dodson v. Industrial Commission

58 Ohio St. 2d 399 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 20, 1979

Niles, v. Bernard (1978), 53 Ohio St. 2d 31, 33 . In paragraph one of the syllabus in Zavatsky v. … Brown, Sweeney, Locher and Holmes, JJ., concur.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Dubyak

92 Ohio St. 3d 18 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 30, 2001

OFFICE OF DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. DUBYAK. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Dubyak, 2001-Ohio-145.] … Respondent denied violations of DR 1-102(A)(3) and 1-102(A)(6). {¶ 5} The matter was referred to a panel of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court (“board”), which held a hearing

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Grdina

101 Ohio St. 3d 150 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 11, 2004

V(4)(G) (failing to cooperate in an investigation of misconduct). … V(4)(G), as found by the board. We also concur in the recommended sanction.

State ex rel. Castro v. Corrigan

129 Ohio St. 3d 448 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 17, 2011

Castro v. Corrigan, 129 Ohio St.3d 342, 2011-Ohio-4059.] THE STATE EX REL. CASTRO, APPELLANT, v. CORRIGAN, JUDGE, APPELLEE. [Cite as State ex rel. Castro v. Corrigan, 129 Ohio St.3d 342, 2011-Ohio-4059.] … McGrath v.

Sexton v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

69 Ohio St. 2d 431 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 24, 1982

In Bartlett v. Nationwide Mutl. Ins. … Brown, Sweeney and C. Brown, JJ., concur. Locher, Holmes and Krupansky, JJ., dissent. State Farm admits that Sexton qualifies as an insured under its definition (1).

Masheter v. Leach

5 Ohio St. 2d 257 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 23, 1966

The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed on the grounds and for the reasons stated in Masheter, Dir. of Hwys., v. Junk, supra. Judgment affirmed. Taut, C. … J., Zimmerman, Matthias, O’Neill, Herbert, Schneider and Brown, JJ., concur.

State, Ex Rel. v. Bldg. Comm.

124 Ohio St. 413 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 16, 1931

Cas., 207; Lewis v. Board of Education of City of Detroit , 139 Mich. 306 , 102 N.W. 756 ; Adams v. Brenan , 177 Ill. 194 , 52 N.E. 314 , 42 L.R.A., 718 , 69 Am. St. Rep., 222 ; Holden v. … Stein , 111 Ga. 789 , 36 S.E. 932 , 51 L.R.A., 335 ; Marshall Bruce Co. v. City of Nashville , 109 Tenn. 495 , 71 S.W. 815 ; Paterson Chronicle Co. v. City of Paterson , 66 N.J. Law, 129 , 48 A. 589 ; Davenport v.

State v. Van Johnson

63 Ohio St. 3d 306 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 25, 1992

This cause is reversed on the authority of State v. Murnahan (1992), 63 Ohio St.3d 60 , 584 N.E.2d 1204 . … Sweeney, J., dissents based on his dissent in State v. Murnahan (1992), 63 Ohio St.3d 60, 67-68 , 584 N.E.2d 1204, 1210 . Wright and H. Brown, JJ., dissent.

State Ex Rel. Flask v. Collins

148 Ohio St. 45 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 23, 1947

In the case of McCullers v. Board of Commrs. of Wake County, 158 N. C., 75 , 73 S. E., 816 , Ann. … In Mack v. Polonko, 118 N. J.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Macurdy

56 Ohio St. 3d 69 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 12, 1990

V(44), we disbar respondent from the practice of law in Ohio. Costs taxed to respondent. Judgment accordingly. Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Douglas, Wright, H. Brown and Re snick, JJ., concur.

Blaney & Morgan v. Hoke

14 Ohio St. (N.S.) 292 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1863

French v. Millard, 2 Ohio St. … .# This is, in effect, held in the case of Thomas v. Dering, 15 E. Ch. R. (1 Keen), 729.

Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Mallin

86 Ohio St. 3d 310 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 25, 1999

CLEVELAND BAR ASSOCIATION v. MALLIN. [Cite as Cleveland Bar Assn. v. Mallin, 1999-Ohio-106.] … of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline of the Supreme Court of Ohio (“board”) held a hearing.

Roma v. Industrial Commission

97 Ohio St. (N.S.) 247 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 19, 1918

This question has been decided otherwise by this court in the case of Reinholz, Gdn., v. … of Awards would *255 have done had such board found in favor of the claimant.

State v. Thomas

62 Ohio St. 3d 1423 · Ohio Supreme Court · Oct 2, 1991

On motion to consolidate with 90-1898, State v. Pierce, Delaware County, No. 89-CA-30. Motion denied. Holmes, J., dissents. H. Brown, J., would stay decision on this motion pending receipt of briefs in both cases.

Stark County Bar Ass'n v. Beyoglides

169 Ohio St. (N.S.) 201 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 6, 1959

In view of statements in the opinion in State v. … The objections to the findings and recommendation of the board are overruled, the report of the board is confirmed, and judgment is rendered accordingly. Report confirmed, and judgment accordingly. Weygandt, C.

Dublin-Sawmill Properties v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Revision

1993 Ohio 230 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 16, 1993

Dublin-Sawmill Properties, Appellant, v. Franklin County Board of Revision et al., Appellees. [Cite as Dublin-Sawmill Properties v. Franklin Cty. Bd. … Assoc. v. Cuyahoga Cty.

Columbus & Southern Ohio Electric Co. v. Public Utilities Commission

58 Ohio St. 2d 120 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 9, 1979

Duff v. Pub. Util. Comm. (1978), 56 Ohio St. 2d 367, 370 ; Cleveland Elec. Illuminating Co. v. Pub. Util. … Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney and Holmes, JJ., concur. *127 Locher, J., dissents for the reasons stated in his dissenting opinion in Columbus v. Pub. Util.

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Friedman

56 Ohio St. 3d 69 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 12, 1990

V(44), we hereby publicly reprimand respondent for his conduct. Costs taxed to respondent. Judgment accordingly. Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur. Douglas, J., not participating.

Burlingame v. Estate of Burlingame

134 Ohio St. 3d 490 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 6, 2012

[Cite as Burlingame v. Estate of Burlingame, 134 Ohio St.3d 490, 2012-Ohio-5698.] BURLINGAME, APPELLEE, v. ESTATE OF BURLINGAME ET AL., APPELLEES; COOMBS ET AL., APPELLANTS. … O’CONNOR, C.J., and LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur.

Cleveland Metropolitan Bar Ass'n v. Freeman

135 Ohio St. 3d 263 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 6, 2013

Bar Assn. v. … V(4)(G). {¶ 12} We adopt the board’s findings of fact and misconduct with respect to each of the three counts summarized above.