Opinion

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Friedman

56 Ohio St. 3d 69
564 N.E.2d 430
1990 Ohio LEXIS 1712

Court: Ohio Supreme Court
Filed: Dec 12, 1990
Status: Published
On the bench: Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Moyer, Resnick, Sweeney, Wright
Cited by: 0 cases

The opinion

Per Curiam.

Pursuant to Gov. Bar R. V(44), we hereby publicly reprimand respondent for his conduct. Costs taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Sweeney, Holmes, Wright, H. Brown and Resnick, JJ., concur.

Douglas, J., not participating.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.