Opinion

Stark County Bar Ass'n v. Beyoglides

  • 169 Ohio St. (N.S.) 201
Court
Ohio Supreme Court
Filed
May 6, 1959
Status
Published
On the bench
Bell, Herbert, Matthias, Peck, Taft, Weygandt, Zimmerman
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

Per Curiam.

In view of statements in the opinion in State v. Morello, post, 213, to the effect that scienter need not be proved in order to sustain a conviction for selling intoxicants to a minor, some doubt has been expressed by some members of the court as to whether conviction of the offense of selling intoxicants to a minor shows moral turpitude in the instant case. However, since the court is of the opinion that a substantial number of the findings of the board on the other charges are sufficient to support the recommendation of the board, we do not find it necessary to pass on that question at this time.

The objections to the findings and recommendation of the board are overruled, the report of the board is confirmed, and judgment is rendered accordingly.

Report confirmed, and judgment accordingly.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Taft, Matthias, Bell and Herbert, JJ., concur.

Peck, J., not participating.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.