Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.52s
Columbus City Schools Bd. of Edn. v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Revision (Slip Opinion)
159 Ohio St. 3d 283 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 6, 2020
SLIP OPINION NO. 2020-OHIO-353 COLUMBUS CITY SCHOOLS BOARD OF EDUCATION, APPELLEE, v. FRANKLIN COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION ET AL., APPELLEES; PALMER HOUSE BORROWER, L.L.C., APPELLANT. … See State v. Shearer, 11th Dist.
Cited 13 timesPublishedMethodist Episcopal Church v. Rench's
7 Ohio St. (N.S.) 369 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1857
At the time of his decease he had in part completed the building'for Brown. … These views are sustained by the cases of Kearny v. The Boston & Worcester Railroad Company, 9 Cush. 108 ; Hollenback v. Berkshire Railroad Company, 9 Cush. 478 ; Roberts v. Read et al., 16 East, 216.
Cited 0 timesPublishedDayton Bar Association v. Strahorn.
152 Ohio St. 3d 288 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 28, 2017
V(13)(C)(8). {¶ 13} The board recommended that we impose a six-month fully stayed suspension for Strahorn’s misconduct. … Assn. v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedNaylor v. Cardinal Local School Dist. Bd. of Edn.
69 Ohio St. 3d 162 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 27, 1994
Clark v. … Smith v.
Cited 12 timesPublishedCincinnati Bar Association v. Hauck
148 Ohio St. 3d 203 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 22, 2016
V(25). … Bar Assn. v.
Cited 7 timesPublished143 Ohio St. 3d 39 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 19, 2015
Akron Bar Assn. v. … Effective January 1, 2015, the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline has been renamed the Board of Professional Conduct. See Gov.Bar R. V(1)(A), 140 Ohio St.3d CEL .
Cited 7 timesPublishedOhio State Bar Association v. McCafferty
140 Ohio St. 3d 229 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 17, 2014
As the board correctly observed, a judge’s violation of these duties can undermine public confidence in the judiciary, particularly when the violation constitutes a felony, Disciplinary Counsel v. … Id. at ¶ 33, citing Kloepfer v.
Cited 11 timesPublishedState ex rel. Breno v. Industrial Commission
34 Ohio St. 2d 227 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 20, 1973
Coen, v. Indus. Comm. (1933), 126 Ohio St. 550 ; State, ex rel. Bevis, v. Coffinberry (1949), 151 Ohio St. 293 ; State, ex rel. Szekely, v. Indus. Comm. (1968), 15 Ohio St. 2d 237 ; Marshall v. … Brown and P. Brown, JJ., concur.
Cited 21 timesPublished72 Ohio St. 3d 173 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 10, 1995
Bar Assn. v. … As noted above, the board dismissed that count because it had not been proved by clear and convincing evidence. We defer to the board and decline to disturb that finding. See Cincinnati Bar Assn. v.
Cited 15 timesPublishedState ex rel. Johnson v. Shoemaker
6 Ohio St. 3d 215 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 10, 1983
This court finds that State v. Henry (1983), 4 Ohio St. 3d 44 , is controlling here. … Brown, Sweeney, Locher, C. Brown and J. P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur. Holmes, J., concurs separately. Holmes, J., concurring. Although I dissented in the case of State v.
Cited 3 timesPublishedWorthington City School Dist. Bd. of Edn. v. Franklin Cty. Bd. of Revision
85 Ohio St. 3d 156 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 31, 1999
ELECTRICAL MECHANICS, APPELLANT, v. HAMILTON COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION ET AL., APPELLEES. BISSETT STEEL COMPANY, APPELLANT, v. … CUYAHOGA COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION ET AL., APPELLEES. CLEVELAND HEIGHTS/UNIVERSITY HEIGHTS BOARD OF EDUCATION, APPELLANT, v.
Cited 13 timesPublishedDisciplinary Counsel v. Holben
2018 Ohio 5097 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 20, 2018
Applicable precedent {¶ 15} To support its recommended sanction, the board cited Disciplinary Counsel v. Oldfield , 140 Ohio St.3d 123 , 2014-Ohio-2963 , 16 N.E.3d 581 , and Ohio State Bar Assn. v. … The board's recommended sanction is appropriate in this case. See also Ohio State Bar Assn. v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedLook Ahead Am. v. Stark Cty. Bd. of Elections
2024 Ohio 2691 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 18, 2024
SLIP OPINION NO. 2024-OHIO-2691 LOOK AHEAD AMERICA ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. STARK COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS ET AL., APPELLEES. … See, e.g., Weiss v. Porterfield, 27 Ohio St.2d 117, 120 (1971); Slingluff v. Weaver, 66 Ohio St. 621, 628-629 (1902); Hamilton v. The Steamboat R.B. Hamilton, 16 Ohio St. 428, 432- 433 (1866); Costanzo v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedCleveland Metro. Bar Assn. v. King (Slip Opinion)
2019 Ohio 4715 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 19, 2019
Bar Assn. v. … V(13)(B)(2).
Cited 4 timesPublished61 Ohio St. 2d 55 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 16, 1980
See, e.g., Bissen v. Fujii (1970), 51 Haw. 636 , 466 P. 2d 429 ; Vincent v. Pabst Brewing Co. (1970), 47 Wis. 2d 120 , 177 N.W. 2d 513 ; Maki v. Frelk (1968), 40 Ill. 2d 193 , 239 N.E. 2d 445 ; Peterson v. … Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney and Locher, JJ., concur. Celebrezze, C. J., and Holmes, J., concur in the judgment.
Cited 7 timesPublishedMahoning County Bar Ass'n v. Walsh
8 Ohio St. 3d 32 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 14, 1983
Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. Ebel (1983), 5 Ohio St. 3d 145, 146 . … Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and Wise, JJ., concur. Wise, J., of the Fifth Appellate District, sitting for J. P. Celebrezze, J.
Cited 1 timesPublished34 Ohio St. 2d 69 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 2, 1973
By reason of the holding and mandate of the Supreme Court of the United States in Roe v. Wade (1973), 410 U. S. , 35 L. … Brown and P. BrowN, JJ., concur. Celebrezze, J., dissents.
Cited 3 timesPublished66 Ohio St. 2d 158 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 13, 1981
State v. Muscatello (1978), 55 Ohio St. 2d 201 , paragraph two of the syllabus. … Brown, P. Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes and C. Brown, JJ., concur. R.
Cited 9 timesPublished28 Ohio St. 3d 325 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 26, 1986
Brown, J., concurring. … Reed v. Rootstown Twp. Bd. of Zoning Appeals (1984), 9 Ohio St. 3d 54, 57-62 (Clifford F. Brown, J., dissenting). See, also, Dudukovich, supra; Cincinnati Bell v. Glendale (1975), 42 Ohio St. 2d 368 [ 71 O.O.2d 331 ].
Cited 30 timesPublishedPariseau v. Wedge Products, Inc.
36 Ohio St. 3d 124 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 13, 1988
As explained in Kunkler v. … As Justice Herbert Brown pointed out in Kunkler, supra, this court’s decision in Jones v. VIP Development Co., supra, leaves questions open with respect to just what constitutes “substantial certainty.”
Cited 108 timesPublished
Ask Donna