Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.36s
91 Ohio St. 3d 207 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 28, 2001
The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of Stevens v. Ackman (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 182 , 743 N.E.2d 901 . Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E.
Cited 0 timesPublished20 Ohio St. 2d 135 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 23, 1969
Bd. of County Commrs. v. Budget Comm., 17 Ohio St. 2d 39 . … Binder, v. Board of County Commrs., 174 Ohio St. 23 . The fund provided by that levy is totally under the control of the Soldiers’ Relief Commission.
Cited 4 timesPublishedDayton Power & Light Co. v. Lindley
58 Ohio St. 2d 465 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 27, 1979
v. … The decision of the Board of Tax Appeals is hereby reversed. Decision reversed. W. Bnown, Sweeney and Looker, JJ,, concur. HeRbert, P. Brown and Holmes, JJ., dissent. On March 28, 1979, S. B.
Cited 2 timesPublished110 Ohio St. 59 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 1, 1924
In Worthington v. … E., 122 ; In re Brown, 14 R. I., 371, 51 Am. Rep., 397 ; De Koven v. Alsop, 205 Ill., 309 , 68 N. E., 930 , 63 L. R. A., 587; Green, Trustee, v. Bissell, 79 Conn., 547 , 65 Atl., 1056 , 8 L. R. A. (N. S.), 1011, 118 Am.
Cited 21 timesPublishedDisciplinary Counsel v. Thomas (Slip Opinion)
162 Ohio St. 3d 678 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 9, 2020
Disciplinary Counsel v. … V(13), and the sanctions imposed in similar cases. {¶ 36} The board found one aggravating factor—that Thomas had refused to acknowledge the wrongful nature of her conduct. See Gov.Bar R. V(13)(B)(7).
Cited 0 timesPublishedNortheast Ohio Regional Sewer District v. Shank
58 Ohio St. 3d 16 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 27, 1991
In Cochrel v. … If no adjudication hearing was conducted in accordance with sections 119.09 and 119.10 of the Revised Code, the board shall conduct a hearing de novo on the appeal.” This court, in Union Camp Corp. v.
Cited 21 timesPublished3 Ohio St. 2d 177 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 28, 1965
Board of Comm., 95 Ohio St. 157 ; Annotation, 140 A. L. R. 1076. That a member of the General Assembly is a public officer, not a public employee, ought to be self-evident. See State, ex rel. Grant, v. … Brown, J., concurs in the foregoing dissenting opinion.
Cited 3 timesPublishedProvens v. Stark Cty. Bd. of Mental Retardation & Developmental Disabilities
1992 Ohio 35 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 28, 1992
Provens, Appellant, v. Stark County Board of Mental Retardation & Developmental Disabilities, Appellee. [Cite as Provens v. Stark Cty. … Brown JJ., concur. Resnick, J., concurs in the syllabus and judgment. Douglas, J., concurs in judgment only.
Cited 2 timesPublishedOffice of Disciplinary Counsel v. Furth
93 Ohio St. 3d 173 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 19, 2001
V(6)(J) and Disciplinary Counsel v. Jackson (1998), 81 Ohio St.3d 308, 310 , 691 N.E.2d 262, 263 . … Similarly, in Disciplinary Counsel v.
Cited 13 timesPublished127 Ohio St. 3d 231 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 24, 2010
APPEAL from the Board of Tax Appeals, No. 2007-V-391. __________________ Per Curiam. {¶ 1} This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Tax Appeals (“BTA”) that affirmed … Bd. of Edn. v.
Cited 47 timesPublishedState ex rel. Sales v. Ohio Pub. Emps. Retirement Bd. (Slip Opinion)
156 Ohio St. 3d 433 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 30, 2019
SALES, APPELLEE, v. OHIO PUBLIC EMPLOYEES RETIREMENT BOARD ET AL., APPELLANTS. [Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as State ex rel. Sales v. … The OPERS board abuses its discretion if it enters an order that is not supported by some evidence. State ex rel. Nese v.
Cited 8 timesPublished114 Ohio St. 270 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 9, 1926
Smith v. Barnett, Director of Public Service, 109 Ohio St., 246 , 142 N. E., 611 . … Re etz v. Michigan, 188 U. S., 505 , 23 S. Ct., 390 , 47 L. Ed., 563 .
Cited 8 timesPublishedDisciplinary Counsel v. O'Diam
172 Ohio St. 3d 305 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 6, 2023
Disciplinary Counsel v. … V(13)(C)(1) and (4).
Cited 0 timesPublished128 Ohio St. 3d 1242 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 16, 2011
V(8)(G)(3). If employed pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(8)(G), respondent shall refrain from direct client contact except as provided in Gov.Bar R. … , LANZINGER, CUPP, and MCGEE BROWN, JJ., concur. ______________________ 5
Cited 0 timesPublishedDisciplinary Counsel v. Maynard
126 Ohio St. 3d 1208 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 1, 2010
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Maynard, 126 Ohio St.3d 1208, 2010-Ohio-3399.] DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. MAYNARD. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. … V(8)(G)(3). If employed pursuant to Gov.Bar R. V(8)(G), respondent shall refrain from direct client contact except as provided in Gov.Bar R.
Cited 0 timesPublishedState ex rel. Hannan v. DeCourcy
18 Ohio St. 2d 73 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 7, 1969
Hoye v. Schaefer, 166 Ohio St. 277 , 2 and State, ex rel. Ferris, v. Shaver, 163 Ohio St. 325 , are the direct descendants of Trumbull County Board of Ed. v. State, ex rel. Van Wye, 122 Ohio St. 247 . … Loofbourrow, v. Board of County Commrs., 167 Ohio St. 156 . 3 Furthermore, that decision *82 was within its sound discretion. Dabkowski v. Baumann, 175 Ohio St. 89 ; State, ex rel. Maxson, v.
Cited 15 timesPublished5 Ohio St. 2d 27 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 5, 1966
In Devenney v. … J., Schneider and Brown, JJ., dissent in part.
Cited 14 timesPublished140 Ohio St. 512 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 16, 1942
Bishop v. Board of Education of Mt. … with each teacher holding a professional, permanent, or life certificate who, at the time of the passage of this act, is completing five or more consecutive years of employment by said board."
Cited 4 timesPublished126 Ohio St. 3d 1212 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 8, 2010
[Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Wood, 126 Ohio St.3d 1212, 2010-Ohio-3496.] DISCIPLINARY COUNSEL v. WOOD. [Cite as Disciplinary Counsel v. Wood, 126 Ohio St.3d 1212, 2010-Ohio-3496.] … V(8)(D)(2), and that respondent bear the costs of publication. 4 January Term, 2010 BROWN, C.J., and PFEIFER, LUNDBERG
Cited 0 timesPublishedState ex rel. White v. U.S. Gypsum Co.
49 Ohio St. 3d 134 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 28, 1990
District hearing officers, regional boards of review, as well as the Industrial Commission, all “must specifically state which evidence and only that evidence which has been relied upon to reach [its] conclusion, *136 and … Brown, JJ., concur.
Cited 4 timesPublished
Ask Donna