Case law

Ohio Manufacturers' Ass'n v. Public Utilities Commission

45 Ohio St. 2d 86 · Ohio Supreme Court · Feb 11, 1976

See O’Neil v. Board of County Commissioners (1965), 3 Ohio St. 2d 53, 57 , 209 N. E. 2d 393 . The second issue raised by the O. B. A., in five propositions of law, involves Commission Bule 27.06. … Brown, JJ., concur. Herbert and P. Brown, JJ., concur in the judgment. Corrigan, J., dissents.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Doellman

127 Ohio St. 3d 411 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 15, 2010

V(6)(H). … V(6)(K). {¶ 33} The board adopted the panel’s findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendation. However, the record does not establish that the board provided the notices required by Gov.Bar R. V.(6)(K).

Evans v. Chapman

28 Ohio St. 3d 132 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 24, 1986

See Whitt v. … Brown and Wright, JJ., concur. Douglas, J., concurs in judgment only.

Richland County Bar Ass'n v. Brickley

97 Ohio St. 3d 285 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 4, 2002

V. The board recommended that respondent be indefinitely suspended from the practice .of law with specific conditions to be met before reinstatement will be considered. … V(10).

Geauga County Bar Ass'n v. Hall

38 Ohio St. 3d 342 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 7, 1988

Disciplinary Counsel v. Heck (1984), 15 Ohio St. 3d 33 , 15 OBR 133, 472 N.E. 2d 694 ; Bar Assn. of Greater Cleveland v. Schnittger (1983), 3 Ohio St. 3d 26 , 3 OBR 497, 445 N.E. 2d 662 . … Brown, JJ., concur. Locher, J., not participating.

State Ex Rel. Board of Education of Greenville Township Rural School District v. Dietrich

134 Ohio St. 474 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 30, 1938

public school system and for the equalization of educational advantages throughout the state” which fund, it is there provided, “shall be administered by the Director of Education, with the approval of the state Controlling Board … pupil due to small classes, to be determined as follows:” If a school which has an average daily attendance of less than 180 pupils establishes to the satisfaction of the Director of Education and the state Controlling Board

Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. Lunsford

25 Ohio St. 3d 127 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jul 23, 1986

V(4), neglecting or refusing to assist in an investigation undertaken by the Disciplinary Counsel. As we stated in Disciplinary Counsel v. … Brown, Douglas and Wright, JJ., concur.

Estates of Morgan v. Fairfield Family Counseling Ctr.

77 Ohio St. 3d 284 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 22, 1997

ESTATES OF MORGAN ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. FAIRFIELD FAMILY COUNSELING CENTER ET AL., APPELLEES; BROWN, APPELLANT. [Cite as Estates of Morgan v. … The Fairfield County Mental Health Board was also named as a defendant below, but was subsequently dismissed from the action.

State, Ex Rel. v. Metzer

137 Ohio St. 307 · Ohio Supreme Court · Sep 20, 1940

State ex rel. Ellis v. Sulligan

6 Ohio St. 2d 65 · Ohio Supreme Court · Apr 8, 1966

J., ZimmermaN, Matthias, O’Neill, Herbert, Schneider and Brown, JJ., concur.

Disciplinary Counsel v. Bell

2024 Ohio 876 · Ohio Supreme Court · Mar 13, 2024

V(13)(B)(2). … People v. Brown, 726 P.2d 638, 641 (Colo.1986).

M.H. v. City of Cuyahoga Falls

134 Ohio St. 3d 65 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 20, 2012

[Cite as M.H. v. Cuyahoga Falls, 134 Ohio St.3d 65, 2012-Ohio-5336.] M.H. ET AL., APPELLEES, v. THE CITY OF CUYAHOGA FALLS, APPELLANT, ET AL. [Cite as M.H. v. … The complaint alleged that the city was negligent in the care or control of its pool or diving board and that the negligence caused the injury suffered by M.H.

Mann v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision (Slip Opinion)

152 Ohio St. 3d 197 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 6, 2017

SLIP OPINION NO. 2017-OHIO-8820 MANN, APPELLANT, v. CUYAHOGA COUNTY BOARD OF REVISION ET AL., APPELLEES. … Ohio Village Hous., Inc. v. Franklin Cty.

Snodgrass v. Harris

2024 Ohio 3130 · Ohio Supreme Court · Aug 20, 2024

.” {¶ 45} In construing former R.C. 5717.02, this court held that a notice of appeal that does not meet the requirements of R.C. 5717.02 is insufficient to invoke the board’s jurisdiction. See Brown v. … Brown v. Dayton, 89 Ohio St.3d 245, 248 (2000). Yet that meaning of privity is not what Nexus has in mind when it says that Snodgrass is bound to the settlement agreement as a privy.

Novita Industries, L.L.C. v. Lorain Cty. Bd. of Revision (Slip Opinion)

153 Ohio St. 3d 57 · Ohio Supreme Court · May 30, 2018

[Until this opinion appears in the Ohio Official Reports advance sheets, it may be cited as Novita Industries, L.L.C. v. Lorain Cty. … SLIP OPINION NO. 2018-OHIO-2023 NOVITA INDUSTRIES, L.L.C., APPELLANT AND CROSS-APPELLEE, v.

Dale v. Ohio Civil Service Employees Ass'n

57 Ohio St. 3d 112 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jan 30, 1991

Labor disputes also occur in private industries falling under the jurisdiction of the National Mediation Board by virtue of the Railway Labor Act, see, e.g., Eastern Air Lines, Inc. v. Air Line Pilots Assn. (S.D. … , the State Employment Relations Board, or some other administrative agency.

State, Ex Rel. v. Bd. of Edn.

137 Ohio St. 145 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 26, 1940

The court cannot control that discretion or substitute its own discretion for that of the board of education. … The court thus would be making a selection that is within the absolute power and discretion of the board of education.

Schmidt v. Avco Corp.

15 Ohio St. 3d 310 · Ohio Supreme Court · Dec 31, 1984

See, e.g., Vinci v. American Can Co. (1984), 9 Ohio St. 3d 98 . It is within this context that this court addresses the specifics of this class action determination. … Brown, Sweeney, Locher, Holmes, C. Brown and J. P. Celebrezze, JJ., concur.

Security Sewage Equipment Co. v. McFerren

14 Ohio St. 2d 251 · Ohio Supreme Court · Jun 12, 1968

In accord, Thornton v. Arlington Independent School District, 332 S. W. 2d 395 (Tex. Civ. App.); Shore Investment Co. v. Hotel Trinidad, Inc., 158 Fla. 682 , 29 So. 2d 696 ; Fischler v. … J., Zimmerman, Matthias, 0’Neill, Herbert and Brown, JJ., concur. In London & Lancashire Indemnity Co. v.

City of Canton v. Whitman

44 Ohio St. 2d 62 · Ohio Supreme Court · Nov 19, 1975

E. 2d 714 (Brown, J., dissent *66 ing); Leavers v. Canton (1964), 1 Ohio St. 2d 33, 37 , 203 N. E. 2d 354 . Matters involving local self-government and those involving the police power often overlap. … “If a water supply extends into more than one county, the board of elections of the county where the petitions are filed shall, within ten days after such filing, send notice of such filing to all other boards of elections